Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

-

Quadro FX Rodzina

Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 bit @ 350 MHz
Nazwa roboczaN10E-GLM4
ArchitekturaG9x
Potoki128 - ZJC
Zegar rdzenia675 MHz
Zegar jednostek cieniujących1688 MHz
Zegar pamięci1000 MHz
Magistrala256 bit
Typ pamięciGDDR3
Maks. pamięci1024 MB
Pamięć współdzielonanie
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Pobór prądu100 W
Liczba tranzystorów754 mln
Technologia55 nm
TechnologieOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0
Wielkość laptopaduży
Data premiery20.12.2009
Witryna producentahttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...

Testy

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6584     avg: 6951     median: 6779 (2%)     max: 7491 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5758     avg: 5926     median: 6002 (3%)     max: 6019 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 12050     avg: 12765     median: 12923 (18%)     max: 13323 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
specvp11 ensight-04 +
specvp11 catia-03 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
- Zakres wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficznej
- Średnia wartość wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficzne
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Testy gier

Zamieszczone niżej wyniki pochodzą z testów zrecenzowanych laptopów. Należy pamiętać, że osiągi poszczególnych konfiguracji zależą od zastosowanej pamięci własnej karty (VRAM), zegarów karty (mogą być różne), procesora, ustawień systemu, sterowników i wersji systemu operacyjnego. Tym samym uzyskane wyniki nie muszą być reprezentatywne dla wszystkich laptopów wyposażonych w daną kartę graficzną. By uzyskać szczegółowe informacje o wynikach testów, należy kliknąć na podaną wartość liczbową (fps, czyli kl/s).

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
med. 1024x768
230.6  fps    + Porównaj
high 1360x768
124.2  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
64.9  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
31.8  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach med..
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
78.5  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
40.9  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach ultra.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
97  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1024x768
82  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach med..
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
142.8  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1280x1024
61.9  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach ultra.

Więcej informacji w rankingu płynności w grach

v1.19
log 23. 23:15:31

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:34:53 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.033s ... 0.034s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.038s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#22 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.038s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 1541 +0.01s ... 0.049s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s ... 0.058s

#25 got single benchmarks 1541 +0.005s ... 0.064s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.066s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.014s ... 0.079s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.081s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.089s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.091s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.097s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.102s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.011s ... 0.113s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.116s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.122s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.033s ... 0.155s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.161s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.162s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.033s ... 0.195s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s ... 0.204s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.207s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.207s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.212s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.216s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.219s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.224s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.227s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.23s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.234s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.07s ... 0.304s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.313s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.017s ... 0.33s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.015s ... 0.345s

#55 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.345s

#56 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.345s

#57 Got 11 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.347s

#58 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.347s

#59 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.35s

#60 benchmarks composed for output. +0.071s ... 0.421s

#61 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.423s

#62 return log +0s ... 0.423s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170

Klasa 1

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6850M XT *
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *
Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 6700M *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *

Klasa 2

A770M *
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
A730M *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M XT *
Radeon RX 6650M *
Radeon RX 6600M *
Radeon RX 6700S *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6600S *
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 5600M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU *
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
Radeon Pro 5600M *
A550M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU *
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6500M *
A370M *
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon RX 5500M
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce MX570 *
Radeon RX 6300M *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
A350M *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T550 Laptop GPU *
T500 Laptop GPU *

Klasa 3

Radeon Pro Vega 20
GeForce MX550 *
Radeon 680M
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro M1200
Radeon Pro 555X
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Radeon 540X *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7 *
Radeon 660M *
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Vega 6 *
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) *

Klasa 4

UHD Graphics 730
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) *
UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Klasa 5

* lokata szacunkowa

> laptopy testy i recenzje notebooki > Rankingi > Zestawienie mobilnych układów graficznych > NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2012-07-17)