Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

-

Quadro FX Rodzina

Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 bit @ 350 MHz
Nazwa roboczaNB8P-GLM
ArchitekturaG8x
Potoki32 - ZJC
Zegar rdzenia625 MHz
Zegar jednostek cieniujących1250 MHz
Zegar pamięci800 MHz
Magistrala128 bit
Typ pamięciGDDR3
Maks. pamięci512 MB
Pamięć współdzielonanie
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Pobór prądu50 W
Liczba tranzystorów289 mln
Technologia80 nm
TechnologieOpenGL 2.1, PureVideo HD, Powermizer 7.0, LVDS, DVI, VGA, HDTV, HDCP, HDMI
Wielkość laptopaduży
Data premiery01.06.2007
Inne-
Witryna producentahttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.html

Testy

3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 4798     avg: 4916     median: 4915.5 (7%)     max: 5033 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
- Zakres wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficznej
- Średnia wartość wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficzne
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Testy gier

Zamieszczone niżej wyniki pochodzą z testów zrecenzowanych laptopów. Należy pamiętać, że osiągi poszczególnych konfiguracji zależą od zastosowanej pamięci własnej karty (VRAM), zegarów karty (mogą być różne), procesora, ustawień systemu, sterowników i wersji systemu operacyjnego. Tym samym uzyskane wyniki nie muszą być reprezentatywne dla wszystkich laptopów wyposażonych w daną kartę graficzną. By uzyskać szczegółowe informacje o wynikach testów, należy kliknąć na podaną wartość liczbową (fps, czyli kl/s).

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
83.2 84.2 ~ 84 fps    + Porównaj
med. 1024x768
31.5 33.3 ~ 32 fps    + Porównaj
high 1024x768
13.6 14.4 15.9 ~ 15 fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
67.2
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
25.6
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
57.2
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
21.9
16.4
High 1280x800
12.3
9.9
High 800x600
19.4
Medium 1680x1050
13.6
Low 1920x1200
23.5
Low 1920x1200
35.8
Medium 1920x1200
13.4
High 1920x1200
5.3
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
12.7 72.2 73.1 ~ 53 fps    + Porównaj
med. 1024x768
23.5 29.6 ~ 27 fps    + Porównaj
high 1024x768
13.2 15.6 ~ 14 fps    + Porównaj
» Na większości testowanych laptopów grywalna przy ustawieniach low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
59.9
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
22.6
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
50.6
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
19.4
15.7
High 1440x900
9.4
Medium 1680x1050
12.6
High 1920x1200
5.1
Medium 1920x1200
9.8
Low 1920x1200
31.6
19.1
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
11.9
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
18.5
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
36 37 ~ 37 fps    + Porównaj
high 1024x768
21 23 ~ 22 fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
33
31
High 2xAF 2xAA 1280x800
20
18
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
29
27
High 2xAF 2xAA 1440x900
18
14
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1680x1050
24
High 2xAF 2xAA 1680x1050
12
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
444 476 493 ~ 471 fps    + Porównaj
med. 800x600
153 162 167 ~ 161 fps    + Porównaj
high 1024x768
56 56 59 ~ 57 fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
160.8 173.6 ~ 167 fps    + Porównaj
med. 640x480
164.3 174 ~ 169 fps    + Porównaj
high 800x600
160.6 165 ~ 163 fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1024x768
129.1 129.2 ~ 129 fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach ultra.

Więcej informacji w rankingu płynności w grach

v1.19
log 25. 14:57:56

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:34:53 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.029s ... 0.03s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.034s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#22 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.034s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 183 +0.01s ... 0.045s

#24 got single benchmarks 183 +0.009s ... 0.054s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.055s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.06s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.065s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.011s ... 0.076s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s ... 0.086s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.025s ... 0.11s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.11s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.118s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.025s ... 0.143s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s ... 0.152s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.154s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.033s ... 0.187s

#41 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.199s

#42 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.199s

#43 Got 36 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.202s

#44 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.203s

#45 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.205s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.208s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.215s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.221s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.228s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.228s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.228s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.23s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.23s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.234s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s ... 0.243s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.243s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.243s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.245s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.251s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.256s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.256s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.256s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.256s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.256s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.256s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.258s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.262s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.265s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.272s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.276s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.28s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.283s

#73 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.295s

#74 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.298s

#75 return log +0s ... 0.298s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170

Klasa 1

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6850M XT *
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *
Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 6700M *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *

Klasa 2

A770M *
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
A730M *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M XT *
Radeon RX 6650M *
Radeon RX 6600M *
Radeon RX 6700S *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6600S *
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 5600M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU *
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
Radeon Pro 5600M *
A550M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU *
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6500M *
A370M *
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon RX 5500M
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce MX570 *
Radeon RX 6300M *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
A350M *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T550 Laptop GPU *
T500 Laptop GPU *

Klasa 3

Radeon Pro Vega 20
GeForce MX550 *
Radeon 680M
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro M1200
Radeon Pro 555X
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Radeon 540X *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7 *
Radeon 660M *
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Vega 6 *
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) *

Klasa 4

UHD Graphics 730
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) *
UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Klasa 5

* lokata szacunkowa

> laptopy testy i recenzje notebooki > Rankingi > Zestawienie mobilnych układów graficznych > NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2012-07-17)