Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

-

Quadro M Rodzina

Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 bit @ 900 MHz
Nazwa roboczaFermi
ArchitekturaFermi
Potoki240 - ZJC
Zegar rdzenia450 MHz
Zegar jednostek cieniujących900 MHz
Zegar pamięci625 MHz
Magistrala256 bit
Typ pamięciGDDR5
Maks. pamięci2048 MB
Pamięć współdzielonanie
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Pobór prądu75 W
Technologia40 nm
TechnologieOpenGl 4.1, FP32
Wielkość laptopaduży
Data premiery22.02.2011

Testy

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 14054     avg: 14221     median: 14220.5 (20%)     max: 14387 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
specvp11 ensight-04 +
specvp11 catia-03 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 45.4     avg: 45.5     median: 45.5 (17%)     max: 45.65 fps
- Zakres wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficznej
- Średnia wartość wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficzne
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Testy gier

Zamieszczone niżej wyniki pochodzą z testów zrecenzowanych laptopów. Należy pamiętać, że osiągi poszczególnych konfiguracji zależą od zastosowanej pamięci własnej karty (VRAM), zegarów karty (mogą być różne), procesora, ustawień systemu, sterowników i wersji systemu operacyjnego. Tym samym uzyskane wyniki nie muszą być reprezentatywne dla wszystkich laptopów wyposażonych w daną kartę graficzną. By uzyskać szczegółowe informacje o wynikach testów, należy kliknąć na podaną wartość liczbową (fps, czyli kl/s).

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
206.2  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
127.3  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach ultra.
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
66.7  fps    + Porównaj
high 1366x768
39.6  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
30.4  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
104.8  fps    + Porównaj
high 1366x768
70.9  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach ultra.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
113.5  fps    + Porównaj
high 1360x768
71.4  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach ultra.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
187.6  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1280x1024
52.4  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach ultra.

Więcej informacji w rankingu płynności w grach

v1.19
log 27. 04:10:05

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 26 Nov 2022 16:34:58 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.044s ... 0.045s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.046s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.046s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.047s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.047s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.001s ... 0.048s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.049s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.049s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.049s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.049s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.051s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.051s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.051s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#22 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.051s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 2433 +0.011s ... 0.062s

#24 got single benchmarks 2433 +0.007s ... 0.07s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.075s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.076s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s ... 0.085s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.09s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.094s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.098s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.102s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.01s ... 0.112s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.113s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.011s ... 0.125s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.024s ... 0.149s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.011s ... 0.16s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.163s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.072s ... 0.234s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.239s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.242s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.243s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.25s

#44 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.25s

#45 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.25s

#46 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.252s

#47 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.252s

#48 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.255s

#49 benchmarks composed for output. +0.091s ... 0.346s

#50 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 0.349s

#51 return log +0s ... 0.349s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170

Klasa 1

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6850M XT *
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *
Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 6700M *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *

Klasa 2

A770M *
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
A730M *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M XT *
Radeon RX 6650M *
Radeon RX 6600M *
Radeon RX 6700S *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6600S *
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 5600M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU *
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
Radeon Pro 5600M *
A550M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU *
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6500M *
A370M *
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon RX 5500M
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce MX570 *
Radeon RX 6300M *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
A350M *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T550 Laptop GPU *
T500 Laptop GPU *

Klasa 3

Radeon Pro Vega 20
GeForce MX550 *
Radeon 680M
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro M1200
Radeon Pro 555X
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Radeon 540X *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7 *
Radeon 660M *
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Vega 6 *
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) *

Klasa 4

UHD Graphics 730
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) *
UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Klasa 5

* lokata szacunkowa

> laptopy testy i recenzje notebooki > Rankingi > Zestawienie mobilnych układów graficznych > NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2012-07-17)