Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

-

Quadro Turing Rodzina

Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 bit @ 10000 MHz
Nazwa roboczaN19E-Q3 MAX-Q
ArchitekturaTuring
Potoki2560 - ZJC
Zegar rdzenia780 - 960 - 1380 - 1485 (Boost) MHz
Zegar pamięci14000 MHz
Magistrala256 bit
Typ pamięciGDDR6
Maks. pamięci8 GB
Pamięć współdzielonanie
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Pobór prądu80 - 90 W
Liczba tranzystorów10.8 Billion
Technologia12 nm
TechnologieDLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Wielkość laptopaduży
Data premiery27.05.2019

Testy

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
7.8 pt (23%)
0.06605 -99%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
6.09 -22%
6.2 -20%
6.68 -14%
6.69 -14%
6.72 -14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
6.75 -13%
6.76 -13%
6.79 -13%
7.44 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
7.77
7.85 1%
7.9 2%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
8.04 3%
8.29 7%
8.41 8%
8.49 9%
9.02 16%
9.29 20%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9.39 21%
...
21.1 172%
max:
33.3 329%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
6724 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
6764 Points (18%)
113 -98%
...
5637 -17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5653 -16%
5702 -16%
5830 -14%
5869 -13%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
5934 -12%
6206 -8%
6422 -5%
6745 0%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
6764
6867 2%
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
7129 5%
7284 8%
7432 10%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7445 10%
7651 13%
7763 15%
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
7864 16%
7903 17%
...
19434 187%
max:
36485 439%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
23072 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
23809 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
35167 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
15010 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
17049 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
35402 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 19079     avg: 19888     median: 19888 (28%)     max: 20697 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 23464     avg: 23574     median: 23574 (20%)     max: 23684 Points
171.8 -99%
...
19881 -16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
20096 -15%
20096 -15%
20506 -13%
21459 -9%
22133 -6%
22405 -5%
22548 -4%
23358 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
23574
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
24213 3%
25100 6%
25371 8%
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
25737 9%
25775 9%
25897 10%
26602 13%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26816 14%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
27104 15%
...
59943 154%
max:
106023 350%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
116 fps (29%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
128 fps (19%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
122 fps (20%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
175 fps (31%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 112.1     avg: 121.1     median: 121.1 (32%)     max: 130 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 225.4     avg: 245.2     median: 245.2 (27%)     max: 265 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 89.3     avg: 93     median: 93 (20%)     max: 96.6 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
81.9 fps (17%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 162     avg: 185     median: 185 (21%)     max: 208 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
35.3 fps (11%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 162.1     avg: 186.1     median: 186.1 (27%)     max: 210 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 181.6     avg: 204.8     median: 204.8 (23%)     max: 228 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 129.5     avg: 150.8     median: 150.8 (26%)     max: 172 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
114.4 fps (22%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
181 fps (30%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
38.3 fps (40%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
159.9 fps (23%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
35.7 fps (29%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
88.3 fps (43%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
60.5 fps (39%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
64.1 fps (29%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
63.1 fps (19%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
111.4 fps (11%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
14.6 fps (14%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
75.8 fps (12%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
41.4 fps (9%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
58.7 fps (28%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
36 fps (24%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
45.3 fps (19%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 191     avg: 210.5     median: 210.5 (12%)     max: 230 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
149.2 Watt (21%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
152.8 Watt (21%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
168.4 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.4 fps per Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.4 fps per Watt (34%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
48 dB(A) (77%)
- Zakres wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficznej
- Średnia wartość wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficzne
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Testy gier

Zamieszczone niżej wyniki pochodzą z testów zrecenzowanych laptopów. Należy pamiętać, że osiągi poszczególnych konfiguracji zależą od zastosowanej pamięci własnej karty (VRAM), zegarów karty (mogą być różne), procesora, ustawień systemu, sterowników i wersji systemu operacyjnego. Tym samym uzyskane wyniki nie muszą być reprezentatywne dla wszystkich laptopów wyposażonych w daną kartę graficzną. By uzyskać szczegółowe informacje o wynikach testów, należy kliknąć na podaną wartość liczbową (fps, czyli kl/s).

low 1280x720
93.3  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1920x1080
78.8  fps    + Porównaj
high 1920x1080
66.2  fps    + Porównaj
4K 3840x2160
45.3  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
low 1280x720
118  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1920x1080
86.5  fps    + Porównaj
high 1920x1080
68.3  fps    + Porównaj
QHD 2560x1440
46.3  fps    + Porównaj
4K 3840x2160
29.7  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
low 1280x720
131  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1366x768
116  fps    + Porównaj
high 1920x1080
107  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
101  fps    + Porównaj
4K 3840x2160
65  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach ultra.
low 1024x768
221  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1366x768
178  fps    + Porównaj
high 1920x1080
115  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
62.6  fps    + Porównaj + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
36  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
29.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.1193.378.866.245.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark11886.568.346.329.7
Dota 2 Reborn13111610710165
The Witcher 322117811562.636
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


2
2


3
1


4


2

1

1
2
1

Więcej informacji w rankingu płynności w grach

v1.26
log 25. 09:02:59

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.061s ... 0.063s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.063s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.063s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.064s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.064s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.065s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.065s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.065s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.065s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.065s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.066s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.066s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.066s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.066s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.066s

#18 composed specs +0s ... 0.066s

#19 did output specs +0s ... 0.066s

#20 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.066s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 9882 +0.032s ... 0.098s

#22 got single benchmarks 9882 +0.01s ... 0.107s

#23 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#24 min, max, avg, median took s +0.791s ... 0.898s

#25 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.899s

#26 Got 19 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.906s

#27 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.906s

#28 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.909s

#29 benchmarks composed for output. +0.242s ... 1.151s

#30 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.153s

#31 return log +0s ... 1.153s

Brak recenzji dla tej karty graficznej.

Please share our article, every link counts!

Klasa 1

GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *

Klasa 2

Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 6700M
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 5700M *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Radeon Pro 5600M *
Radeon RX 5600M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon RX 5500M
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
T600 Laptop GPU *

Klasa 3

Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon 680M
T500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon 660M
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro M1200
Radeon Pro 555X
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Radeon 540X *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon 610M *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) *

Klasa 4

UHD Graphics 730
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) *
UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Klasa 5

* lokata szacunkowa

> laptopy testy i recenzje notebooki > Rankingi > Zestawienie mobilnych układów graficznych > NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-01- 4)