Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G72 MP18

ARM Mali-G72 MP18

-

Mali-G Rodzina

Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitekturaBifrost
Potoki18 - ZJC
Zegar rdzenia850 MHz
Pamięć współdzielonanie
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
Technologia16 nm
Data premiery01.01.2018
Witryna producentahttps://developer.arm.com/products/graph...
CPU in Mali-G72 MP18GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 98108 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz

Testy

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 36190     avg: 43744     median: 46610 (5%)     max: 48433 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3744     avg: 3994     median: 4054.5 (22%)     max: 4124 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3958     avg: 4626     median: 4820 (11%)     max: 4904 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3376     avg: 3634     median: 3435 (21%)     max: 4291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3697     avg: 4023     median: 3794.5 (2%)     max: 4806 Points
91.7 -98%
...
2996 -26%
3178 -21%
3244 -19%
3293 -18%
ARM Mali-G57 MP4
3361 -16%
Qualcomm Adreno 620
3435 -15%
Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR
3443 -14%
3443 -14%
ARM Mali-G76 MP10
3997 -1%
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
4023
ARM Mali-G68 MP4
4144 3%
4231 5%
ARM Mali-G57 MP6
4689 17%
ARM Mali-G57 MP5
4798 19%
ARM Mali-G68 MP5
5129 27%
5424 35%
Apple A12 Bionic GPU
5565 38%
5606 39%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
5657 41%
...
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
25707 539%
0%
100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 58     avg: 59.5     median: 60 (2%)     max: 60 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 80     avg: 129.3     median: 145 (1%)     max: 147 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 45     avg: 48.5     median: 46 (13%)     max: 57 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 73     avg: 74     median: 73.5 (4%)     max: 76 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
17 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
11 fps (2%)
0.314 -97%
...
ARM Mali-G52 MP6
7.8 -29%
ARM Mali-G57 MP4
8.2 -25%
Qualcomm Adreno 620
8.289 -25%
8.433 -23%
8.56 -22%
9.68 -12%
ARM Mali-G68 MP4
10.53 -4%
Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR
10.8 -2%
10.8 -2%
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
11
ARM Mali-G57 MP5
12 9%
12.2 11%
12.3 12%
ARM Mali-G68 MP5
13 18%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
13.67 24%
ARM Mali-G76 MP10
13.67 24%
15.59 42%
Qualcomm Adreno 644
16 45%
17.17 56%
...
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 727%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
28 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
31 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
min: 14     avg: 17     median: 14.5 (0%)     max: 25 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 28.3     median: 28 (0%)     max: 29 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8620     avg: 8803     median: 8802.5 (9%)     max: 8985 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4747     avg: 4762     median: 4762 (8%)     max: 4777 Points
- Zakres wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficznej
- Średnia wartość wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficzne
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Testy gier

Zamieszczone niżej wyniki pochodzą z testów zrecenzowanych laptopów. Należy pamiętać, że osiągi poszczególnych konfiguracji zależą od zastosowanej pamięci własnej karty (VRAM), zegarów karty (mogą być różne), procesora, ustawień systemu, sterowników i wersji systemu operacyjnego. Tym samym uzyskane wyniki nie muszą być reprezentatywne dla wszystkich laptopów wyposażonych w daną kartę graficzną. By uzyskać szczegółowe informacje o wynikach testów, należy kliknąć na podaną wartość liczbową (fps, czyli kl/s).

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
40  fps    + Porównaj + 📈 Graph
high
40  fps    + Porównaj + 📈 Graph
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
59 60 ~ 60 fps    + Porównaj + 📈 Graph
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Porównaj + 📈 Graph
ultra
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Porównaj + 📈 Graph
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach ultra.
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
high
59 60 ~ 60 fps    + Porównaj + 📈 Graph
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Porównaj + 📈 Graph
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Porównaj + 📈 Graph
» Niegrywalna na większości testowanych laptopów.
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
30  30 ~ 30 fps    + Porównaj + 📈 Graph
» Niegrywalna na większości testowanych laptopów.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Porównaj + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Porównaj + 📈 Graph
» Niegrywalna na większości testowanych laptopów.

Więcej informacji w rankingu płynności w grach

v1.22
log 06. 05:57:05

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 02 Jun 2023 11:14:16 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.047s ... 0.048s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.049s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.049s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.049s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#24 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#25 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#26 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#27 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#28 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#29 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#30 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#31 composed specs +0s ... 0.05s

#32 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#33 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.05s

#34 getting avg benchmarks for device 8770 +0.015s ... 0.066s

#35 got single benchmarks 8770 +0.012s ... 0.077s

#36 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#37 min, max, avg, median took s +0.177s ... 0.254s

#38 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.254s

#39 Got 22 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.262s

#40 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.262s

#41 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.266s

#42 benchmarks composed for output. +0.103s ... 0.368s

#43 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 0.371s

#44 return log +0s ... 0.371s

Brak recenzji dla tej karty graficznej.

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170

Klasa 3

UHD Graphics 750
A12Z Bionic GPU *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
Adreno 730 *
Adreno 725 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *

Klasa 4

UHD Graphics 730
A10 Fusion GPU
Mali-G77 MP11 *
Mali-G77 MP9 *
Mali-G76 MP16 *
Mali-G610 MP6 *
Adreno 644 *
Adreno 642 *
Adreno 642L *
Adreno 640 *
Mali-G76 MP10 *
Mali-G68 MP5 *
Mali-G57 MP6 *
Mali-G57 MP5 *
PowerVR GM9446
Mali-G68 MP4 *
Mali-G52 MP6 *
Mali-G68 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP1 *
Adreno 620 *
IMG BXM-8-256
Mali-G57 MP4 *
Mali-G57 MP3 *

Klasa 5

Adreno 619 *
Adreno 619L *
Mali-G57 MP2 *
Mali-G57 MP1 *
Mali-G51 MP4 *
Adreno 330

Klasa 6

Adreno 320 *

* lokata szacunkowa

> laptopy testy i recenzje notebooki > Rankingi > Zestawienie mobilnych układów graficznych > ARM Mali-G72 MP18
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2018-03-17)