Recenzja laptopa Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2: MSI GT77 Titan wydajność bez rozmiarów

175 W GeForce grafika RTX 4090. Nie potrzebujesz gigantycznego laptopa jak MSI GT77, jeśli chcesz ekstremalnej wydajności. Mech-17 GP2 jest o 600 g lżejszy, a jednocześnie posiada podobne 175 W GeForce 40 opcje GPU. Temperatury to jednak inna historia.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (tłumaczenie DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/03/2023 🇺🇸 🇸🇪 ...

Raptor Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 zastępuje zeszłoroczny Mech-17 GP, zamieniając opcje Intel 12th gen i Nvidia Ampere na odpowiednio Intel 13th gen i Nvidia Ada Lovelace. Warto zwrócić uwagę na oferowanie procesorów z serii Core HX i grafiki 175 W GeForce RTX 4090 pomimo niewielkich rozmiarów w stosunku do innych 17-calowych laptopów dla graczy.

Mech-17 GP2 jest oparty na zaktualizowanej wersji zeszłorocznego Schenkera Neo 17 M22 zaprojektowanego przez Uniwill. Jest to w zasadzie Neo 17 E23 choć pod marką Eluktronics. W tym roku wprowadzono kilka istotnych zmian w płytach głównych, które wyszczególnimy w naszych analizach poniżej. Poza tym, ich wygląd zewnętrzny pozostaje identyczny, więc polecamy sprawdzić naszą istniejącą recenzję Schenker Neo 17 M22, aby dowiedzieć się więcej o fizycznych cechach Mech-17 GP2.

Nasza konfiguracja w recenzji została w pełni skonfigurowana z Core i9-13900HX i RTX 4090 za około 3400 USD. Mniejsze jednostki SKU są dostępne w dół do RTX 4070, ale wszystkie opcje inaczej pochodzą z tego samego procesora i 240 Hz 2560 x 1600 IPS wyświetlacz.

Alternatywy dla Mech-17 GP2 obejmują inne wysokiej klasy 17-calowe laptopy do gier, takie jak Razer Blade 17, Alienware m17 R5, Asus Zephyrus S17, lub MSI Titan GT77.

Więcej recenzji Eluktronika:

Test device courtesy of Eluktronics

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2

Procesor

Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 99 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX

Karta grafiki

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 2140 MHz, pamięć: 2375 MHz, 175 W TDP, GDDR6, 531.18, Advanced Optimus, MUX

Pamięć

32 GB

, Samsung DDR5-4800, 40-39-39-76, Dual-Channel

Matryca

17.00 cali 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pikseli 178 PPI, BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, BOE0A99, refleksująca: nie, 240 Hz

Chipset

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Dysk twardy

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB

Karta dźwiękowa

Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS

Złącza

2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: 1x 3.5 mm audio out, 1x mic in, czytnik kart: SD

Łączność

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Gabaryty

wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 27 x 381.7 x 272.8

Akumulator

99 Wh litowo-polimerowy

System operacyjny

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

kamerka: Full HD IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Inne

głośniki: Stereo, klawiatura: Chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, Eluktronics Control Center, 12 miesiące(y) gwarancji

Waga

2.878 kg, zasilacz: 1.108 kg

Cena

3300 USD

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

pełna specyfikacja

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.9 %	03/2023	Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	27 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
87.6 %	09/2022	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	27 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
82.1 %	02/2023	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	25.2 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
89 %	02/2023	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.5 kg	23 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
86.1 %	01/2023	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	3.4 kg	26.7 mm	17.00"	3840x2160
91.4 %	02/2023	Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3 kg	21.9 mm	18.00"	2560x1600

Sprawa

Porównanie wielkości

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 DIN A4 ❌

Czytnik kart SD

Czytnik kart SD jest wolny w stosunku do wysokiej ceny tego modelu. Razer Blade 18 i Dell XPS mają 2x do 3x szybsze czytniki kart.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	202 MB/s ∼100% +162%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	83.5 MB/s ∼41% +8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	77.2 MB/s ∼38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	69 MB/s ∼34% -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	207.8 MB/s ∼100% +131%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	89.9 MB/s ∼43%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	86.2 MB/s ∼41% -4%

Komunikacja

Standardem jest Intel AX201, który zapewnia łączność Wi-Fi 6 i Bluetooth 5.2. Niemniej jednak, biorąc pod uwagę cenę systemu, spodziewaliśmy się AX210/211 dla szybszych prędkości Wi-Fi 6E.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1582 (1517^min, 1518.74^P1 - 1636^max) MBit/s ∼100% +22%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1569 (1259^min - 1667^max) MBit/s ∼99% +21%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1295 (1034^min - 1383^max) MBit/s ∼82%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1196 (618^min - 1298^max) MBit/s ∼76% -8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921	981 MBit/s ∼62% -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	936 (898^min - 971^max) MBit/s ∼59% -28%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1675 (1509^min - 1726^max) MBit/s ∼100% +37%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1545 (1508^min, 1510.9^P1 - 1569^max) MBit/s ∼92% +26%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1362 (1249^min - 1437^max) MBit/s ∼81% +11%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1225 (1116^min - 1351^max) MBit/s ∼73%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921	968 MBit/s ∼58% -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	967 (949^min - 978^max) MBit/s ∼58% -21%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1230 (1091^min - 1327^max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1516 (769^min - 1565^max) MBit/s ∼100%

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1295 (1034-1383)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (898-971)

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1225 (1116-1351)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (949-978)

Kamera internetowa

Kamera internetowa 2 MP FHD i podczerwień są w standardzie dla obsługi Hello. Nie ma jednak przełącznika prywatności ani opcji migawki.

ColorChecker Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2: 14.36 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 32.12 ∆E

Konserwacja

Dolny panel jest zabezpieczony 14 śrubami Philipsa, co pozwala na stosunkowo łatwe serwisowanie. W porównaniu do zeszłorocznego modelu producent zmienił układy wewnętrzne, co widać poniżej, mimo że ich wygląd zewnętrzny pozostał identyczny. Dwa moduły pamięci RAM są teraz ułożone jeden na drugim, aby zaoszczędzić miejsce na płycie głównej, natomiast CPU i GPU zamieniły się pozycjami.

Akcesoria i gwarancja

W pudełku detalicznym nie ma żadnych dodatków poza zasilaczem sieciowym i papierami. Model jest zgodny z opcjonalną zewnętrzną chłodnicą Liquid Propulsion Package drugiej generacji (LPP G2).

Obowiązuje standardowa roczna ograniczona gwarancja producenta. Aktualizacja do trzech lat jest dostępna za dodatkowe 250 dolarów.

Wyświetl

Nasz wczesny model 2023 wykorzystuje ten sam panel BOE NE170QDM-NZ1 i kontroler BOE0A99, co w modelu 2022, co oznacza, że wrażenia wizualne nie różnią się rok do roku. Nasze poniższe pomiary są więc niemal identyczne pomiędzy modelami 2022 i 2023. Nie jest to jednak powód do narzekań, gdyż panel oferuje niemal wszystko, czego oczekujemy od laptopa do gier z wyższej półki, w tym szybkie odświeżanie, krótki czas reakcji, pełne pokrycie palety sRGB oraz obsługę G-Sync. Dla wyższych rozdzielczości i jeszcze głębszych kolorów P3, jednak, będziesz musiał szukać gdzie indziej zamiast jak MSI GT77 lub Razer Blade 18.

Minimalne nierównomierne krwawienie podświetlenia wzdłuż prawego dolnego rogu


363.2 cd/m²	374.3 cd/m²	369.1 cd/m²
380.3 cd/m²	417.3 cd/m²	391.1 cd/m²
386.3 cd/m²	407.4 cd/m²	393.4 cd/m²

podświetlenie ekranu

BOE NE170QDM-NZ1

X-Rite i1Pro 2

maksimum: 417.3 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 386.9 cd/m² Minimum: 21.19 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 87 %
na akumulatorze: 417.3 cd/m²
kontrast: 994:1 (czerń: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.14 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 0.42
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
69.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19

Download Plik ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK B173HAN04.9, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.00	Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00
Display		0%	-40%	23%	23%	21%
Display P3 Coverage	69.1	69 0%	40.8 -41%	94.9 37%	97.2 41%	96.9 40%
sRGB Coverage	99.7	99.8 0%	61 -39%	99.9 0%	99.6 0%	99.8 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.8	69.6 0%	42.2 -40%	92.4 32%	88.4 27%	85.3 22%
Response Times		23%	-176%	-202%	-30%	40%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	12 ?(5.4, 6.6)	10.8 ?(5.1, 5.7) 10%	33 ?(16, 17) -175%	38.4 ?(13.6, 24.8, n) -220%	16.4 ?(7.8, 8.6) -37%	4.2 ?(2.1, 2.1) 65%
Response Time Black / White *	9.4 ?(4.9, 4.5)	6.1 ?(2.5, 3.6) 35%	26 ?(13, 13) -177%	26.6 ?(9.2, 17.4, n) -183%	11.6 ?(6.2, 5.4) -23%	8 ?(3.8, 4.2) 15%
PWM Frequency				2380 ?(100)
Screen		1%	-158%	67678%	-147%	-64%
Brightness middle	417.3	415 -1%	267 -36%	606 45%	484 16%	549.6 32%
Brightness	387	399 3%	256 -34%	602 56%	449 16%	524 35%
Brightness Distribution	87	90 3%	93 7%	93 7%	87 0%	89 2%
Black Level *	0.42	0.43 -2%	0.21 50%	0.0001 100%	0.55 -31%	0.53 -26%
Contrast	994	965 -3%	1271 28%	6060000 609558%	880 -11%	1037 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.14	1.44 33%	4.7 -120%	4.8 -124%	4.8 -124%	3.32 -55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.09	2.33 43%	20.4 -399%	8.2 -100%	7.48 -83%	6.63 -62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.42	0.89 -112%	4.5 -971%	1.8 -329%	4.74 -1029%	2.7 -543%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.1	1.8 42%	1.5 52%	6.5 -110%	5.5 -77%	2 35%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.132 ^103%	2.12 ^104%	2.63 ^84%	2.42 ^91%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	6040 ^108%	6327 ^103%	6552 ^99%	6596 ^99%	6148 ^106%	6319 ^103%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		8% / 4%	-125% / -135%	22500% / 43484%	-51% / -94%	-1% / -31%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Wyświetlacz jest dobrze skalibrowany po wyjęciu z pudełka, a średnie wartości deltaE dla skali szarości i kolorów wynoszą odpowiednio 3,1 i 2,14. Samodzielna kalibracja pozwoliłaby na jeszcze większą poprawę średnich wartości deltaE do zaledwie 0,6 i 0,42 względem standardu sRGB. Nasz skalibrowany profil ICM jest dostępny do pobrania za darmo.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.9 ms rise
9.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.4 ms rise
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18993 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Szerokie kąty widzenia IPS. Kontrast i kolory ulegają pogorszeniu tylko przy oglądaniu pod ekstremalnymi kątami

Wydajność

Warunki badania

Przed uruchomieniem poniższych benchmarków ustawiliśmy nasze urządzenie w trybie Performance za pośrednictwem systemu Windows oraz w trybie "Beast Mode" za pośrednictwem preinstalowanego oprogramowania Eluktronics Control Center. Ustawiliśmy także system w tryb dGPU poprzez panel kontrolny Nvidii. Posiadacze powinni zapoznać się z Centrum Kontroli, ponieważ jest to centrum przełączania funkcji specyficznych dla danego modelu, takich jak RGB, tryby ładowania baterii, tryby wydajności, tryb chłodzenia cieczą i inne. Obsługiwany jest zaawansowany Optimus (MUX).

W naszym testowym egzemplarzu wystąpiło kilka problemów, w tym puste ekrany startowe, co najmniej jedno zawieszenie systemu podczas gry oraz automatyczne restarty, gdy CPU i GPU są maksymalnie obciążone przez dłuższy czas. Pierwszy problem rozwiązaliśmy poprzez wyłączenie funkcji Quick Boot w menu BIOS-u, ale takie problemy nie powinny występować w ogóle.

Procesor

Wydajność procesora jest tylko o 1-2% niższa niż w przypadku 13. generacji Core i9-13950HX w MSI Titan GT77, więc w większości scenariuszy mogą one być równie dobrze równoważne. Przeskakując z Ryzen 9 6900HX do naszego Core i9-13900HX zwiększa wydajność wielowątkową o niezwykłe 2x do 2,5x. Procesor 12. generacji Core i7-12700Hktóry nadal jest powszechnie stosowany w wielu laptopach do gier z wyższej półki cenowej, jest o około 50 procent wolniejszy.

Trwałość wydajności jest doskonała, bez większych spadków wydajności lub zachowań cyklicznych w czasie.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4802 (4757.37-4969.56)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø2295 (2246.31-2349.07)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4980 (4889.98-5226.71)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3311 (3259.45-3569.52)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	88.5 pt ∼89%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	86.6 pt ∼87%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	82.4 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	80.7 pt ∼81%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	76.5 pt ∼77%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	71.4 pt ∼71%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	58 pt ∼58%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	55.6 pt ∼56%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	52.1 pt ∼52%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	49.2 pt ∼49%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	48.7 pt ∼49%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	35.7 pt ∼36%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	33277 Points ∼100% +2%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	32623 (30004.7^min - 32622.9^max) Points ∼98%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28681 (25585.5^min - 28680.9^max) Points ∼86% -12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=21)	28110 Points ∼84% -14%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	25245 Points ∼76% -23%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	22982 Points ∼69% -30%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	17075 (15585.9^min - 17075^max) Points ∼51% -48%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	15496 Points ∼47% -52%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14152 Points ∼43% -57%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	13094 (12158.8^min - 13093.9^max) Points ∼39% -60%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	13012 Points ∼39% -60%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	8408 Points ∼25% -74%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	2100 Points ∼100% 0%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2092 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2076 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=18)	2041 Points ∼97% -2%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	2011 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1913 Points ∼91% -9%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	1805 Points ∼86% -14%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	1711 Points ∼81% -18%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	1575 Points ∼75% -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1557 Points ∼74% -26%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1500 Points ∼71% -28%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	1225 Points ∼58% -41%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	12648 Points ∼100% +1%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	12541 Points ∼99%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	10919 Points ∼86% -13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=19)	10715 Points ∼85% -15%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	9630 Points ∼76% -23%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	8667 Points ∼69% -31%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	6570 Points ∼52% -48%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	5905 Points ∼47% -53%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5549 Points ∼44% -56%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5083 Points ∼40% -59%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	4878 Points ∼39% -61%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	3244 Points ∼26% -74%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	803 Points ∼100% 0%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	802 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	797 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=19)	782 Points ∼97% -2%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	777 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	738 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	693 Points ∼86% -14%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	664 Points ∼83% -17%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	610 Points ∼76% -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	605 Points ∼75% -25%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	598 Points ∼74% -25%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	476 Points ∼59% -41%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	5227 (4889.98^min - 5226.71^max) Points ∼100% +5%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4970 (4757.37^min - 4969.56^max) Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=20)	4519 Points ∼86% -9%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4481 Points ∼86% -10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	3570 (3259.45^min - 3569.52^max) Points ∼68% -28%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	3473 Points ∼66% -30%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	2694 (2457.61^min - 2693.6^max) Points ∼52% -46%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	2349 (2246.31^min - 2349.07^max) Points ∼45% -53%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2296 Points ∼44% -54%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2151 (2104.6^min - 2150.88^max) Points ∼41% -57%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	2148 (1832.59^min - 2147.65^max) Points ∼41% -57%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	1382 Points ∼26% -72%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	300 Points ∼100% 0%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	299 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	297 Points ∼99% -1%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	292 Points ∼97% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=20)	292 Points ∼97% -2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	278 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	258 Points ∼86% -14%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	255 Points ∼85% -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	248 Points ∼83% -17%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	243 Points ∼81% -19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	238 Points ∼79% -20%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	196 Points ∼65% -34%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	326 Seconds * ∼100% -223%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	249 Seconds * ∼76% -147%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	236 Seconds * ∼72% -134%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	216 Seconds * ∼66% -114%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	215 Seconds * ∼66% -113%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	190 Seconds * ∼58% -88%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	147 Seconds * ∼45% -46%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	128.3 Seconds * ∼39% -27%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=20)	118.5 Seconds * ∼36% -17%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	111 Seconds * ∼34% -10%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	101 Seconds * ∼31%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	100 Seconds * ∼31% +1%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	127295 MIPS ∼100% 0%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	127283 MIPS ∼100%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	116665 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=19)	111386 MIPS ∼88% -12%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	96960 MIPS ∼76% -24%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	86234 MIPS ∼68% -32%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	65292 MIPS ∼51% -49%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	64439 MIPS ∼51% -49%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	62324 MIPS ∼49% -51%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	58798 MIPS ∼46% -54%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	53205 MIPS ∼42% -58%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	40876 MIPS ∼32% -68%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6999 MIPS ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	6897 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6880 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=19)	6841 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	6580 MIPS ∼94% -6%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	6256 MIPS ∼89% -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5872 MIPS ∼84% -16%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	5742 MIPS ∼82% -18%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	5672 MIPS ∼81% -19%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5669 MIPS ∼81% -19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	5640 MIPS ∼81% -19%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	5393 MIPS ∼77% -23%

Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5 / Multi-Core
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	20779 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	20634 Points ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	20036 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=20)	19771 Points ∼95% -5%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	17698 Points ∼85% -15%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	16250 Points ∼78% -22%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	11979 Points ∼58% -42%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	11289 Points ∼54% -46%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10126 Points ∼49% -51%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	9856 Points ∼47% -53%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	9385 Points ∼45% -55%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	6688 Points ∼32% -68%

Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5 / Single-Core
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2081 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	2043 Points ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2035 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=20)	1984 Points ∼95% -5%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	1969 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1923 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	1793 Points ∼86% -14%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	1683 Points ∼81% -19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	1632 Points ∼78% -22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1590 Points ∼76% -24%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1535 Points ∼74% -26%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	1264 Points ∼61% -39%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	34.4 fps ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	32.7 fps ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	31 fps ∼90% -10%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	29 fps ∼84% -16%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=20)	29 fps ∼84% -16%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	25.6 fps ∼74% -26%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	19 fps ∼55% -45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	17.5 fps ∼51% -49%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	17.1 fps ∼50% -50%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	16.4 fps ∼48% -52%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	15 fps ∼44% -56%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	11.1 fps ∼32% -68%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	59.3 s * ∼100% -81%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	56.8 s * ∼96% -73%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	56.1 s * ∼95% -71%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	56 s * ∼94% -71%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	49.3 s * ∼83% -50%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	46.5 s * ∼78% -42%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	45.8 s * ∼77% -40%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	43.4 s * ∼73% -32%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=19)	42.2 s * ∼71% -29%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	39 s * ∼66% -19%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	38.1 s * ∼64% -16%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	32.8 s * ∼55%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	0.577 sec * ∼100% -52%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	0.533 sec * ∼92% -40%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.501 sec * ∼87% -32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4808 sec * ∼83% -27%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	0.473 sec * ∼82% -25%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	0.4438 sec * ∼77% -17%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4194 sec * ∼73% -10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4033 sec * ∼70% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=20)	0.4022 sec * ∼70% -6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.3955 sec * ∼69% -4%
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K	0.3946 sec * ∼68% -4%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3799 sec * ∼66%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4970 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

300 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

299 Points

Pomoc

... porównanie

Performance Rating
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	96 pt ∼96%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.8 pt ∼94%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88.2 pt ∼88%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	83.7 pt ∼84%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60.9 pt ∼61%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	59 pt ∼59%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	46.5 pt ∼47%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	28957 KRay/s ∼100% +5%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	27594 KRay/s ∼95%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	25949 KRay/s ∼90% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=20)	23931 KRay/s ∼83% -13%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	16202 KRay/s ∼56% -41%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	16115 KRay/s ∼56% -42%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13601 KRay/s ∼47% -51%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144303 Points ∼100% +10%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	130870 Points ∼91%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	129286 Points ∼90% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 136688, n=20)	119782 Points ∼83% -8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	104841 Points ∼73% -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98800 Points ∼68% -25%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67187 Points ∼47% -49%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7093 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7029 MB/s ∼99%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	6338 MB/s ∼89% -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=20)	6019 MB/s ∼85% -14%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	3457 MB/s ∼49% -51%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3422 MB/s ∼48% -51%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2773 MB/s ∼39% -61%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141385 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	139649 Points ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	137876 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=20)	133850 Points ∼95% -5%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	105169 Points ∼74% -26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102167 Points ∼72% -28%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	78352 Points ∼55% -45%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	17179 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	17057 Points ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	16073 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=20)	14831 Points ∼86% -14%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	12918 Points ∼75% -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	12783 Points ∼74% -26%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	8421 Points ∼49% -51%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	71038 Points ∼100% +6%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	66924 Points ∼94%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	64736 Points ∼91% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=20)	59378 Points ∼84% -11%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	57695 Points ∼81% -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54060 Points ∼76% -19%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	32787 Points ∼46% -51%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	236139 MB/s ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136551 MB/s ∼58% -42%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	135833 MB/s ∼58% -42%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 236139, n=20)	134071 MB/s ∼57% -43%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	122159 MB/s ∼52% -48%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	58525 MB/s ∼25% -75%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	54897 MB/s ∼23% -77%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2059 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1958 MB/s ∼95%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1829 MB/s ∼89% -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=20)	1747 MB/s ∼85% -11%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	854 MB/s ∼41% -56%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	845 MB/s ∼41% -57%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	818 MB/s ∼40% -58%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15573 KRay/s ∼100% +4%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	14948 KRay/s ∼96%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	14066 KRay/s ∼90% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=20)	12968 KRay/s ∼83% -13%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	8777 KRay/s ∼56% -41%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	8529 KRay/s ∼55% -43%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	7364 KRay/s ∼47% -51%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49634 MPixel/s ∼100% +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=20)	48341 MPixel/s ∼97% +9%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	44308 MPixel/s ∼89%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	40896 MPixel/s ∼82% -8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	34544 MPixel/s ∼70% -22%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	30343 MPixel/s ∼61% -32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	30226 MPixel/s ∼61% -32%

Wydajność systemu

Wyniki PCMark są jednymi z najwyższych w naszej bazie danych, rywalizując z MSI Titan GT77. Zwłaszcza jego wynik w Digital Content Creation jest o prawie 70 procent wyższy niż w zeszłorocznym modelu RTX 3080 Ti ze względu na wzrost wydajności graficznej.

PCMark 10 / Score
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9016 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8884 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (7690 - 9331, n=8)	8466 Points ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7609 Points ∼84% -16%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7292 Points ∼81% -19%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7160 Points ∼79% -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6966 Points ∼77% -23%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11983 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11761 Points ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11683 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10972 - 11983, n=8)	11364 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10809 Points ∼90% -10%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10250 Points ∼86% -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9740 Points ∼81% -19%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10755 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9038 - 11680, n=8)	10423 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9851 Points ∼92% -8%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	9645 Points ∼90% -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9564 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9308 Points ∼87% -13%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	9090 Points ∼85% -15%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	16424 Points ∼100% +6%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	15430 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10605 - 16395, n=8)	14052 Points ∼86% -9%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11296 Points ∼69% -27%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10611 Points ∼65% -31%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9903 Points ∼60% -36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9848 Points ∼60% -36%

CrossMark / Overall
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2195 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2139 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2127 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1825 - 2295, n=8)	2107 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1857 Points ∼85% -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1699 Points ∼77% -23%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1597 Points ∼73% -27%

CrossMark / Productivity
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2032 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1977 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1969 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1666 - 2166, n=8)	1960 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1765 Points ∼87% -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1646 Points ∼81% -19%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1565 Points ∼77% -23%

CrossMark / Creativity
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2514 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2423 Points ∼96% -4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2390 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2162 - 2514, n=8)	2379 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2013 Points ∼80% -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1867 Points ∼74% -26%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1738 Points ∼69% -31%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1891 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1861 Points ∼98% +1%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1845 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1441 - 2275, n=8)	1833 Points ∼97% -1%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1734 Points ∼92% -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1405 Points ∼74% -24%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1315 Points ∼70% -29%

PCMark 10 Score		9016 pkt.
Pomoc

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77096 MB/s ∼100% +13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=20)	74856 MB/s ∼97% +10%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	68327 MB/s ∼89%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	63863 MB/s ∼83% -7%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	53391 MB/s ∼69% -22%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	50334 MB/s ∼65% -26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	50231 MB/s ∼65% -26%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86207 MB/s ∼100% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=20)	81989 MB/s ∼95% +9%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	75155 MB/s ∼87%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	62807 MB/s ∼73% -16%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	61613 MB/s ∼71% -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	51403 MB/s ∼60% -32%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	50996 MB/s ∼59% -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	75814 MB/s ∼100% +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=20)	73040 MB/s ∼96% +8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67857 MB/s ∼90%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	60389 MB/s ∼80% -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55263 MB/s ∼73% -19%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	55214 MB/s ∼73% -19%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	50700 MB/s ∼67% -25%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	101.7 ns * ∼100% -16%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	94.6 ns * ∼93% -8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.8 ns * ∼91% -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	90.8 ns * ∼89% -4%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	87.6 ns * ∼86%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=20)	86.4 ns * ∼85% +1%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84.5 ns * ∼83% +4%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienie DPC

LatencyMon ujawnia drobne problemy z DPC podczas otwierania wielu kart przeglądarki na naszej stronie głównej. odtwarzanie wideo w rozdzielczości 4K przy 60 FPS jest poza tym perfekcyjne i nie ma żadnych opuszczonych klatek.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4710.9 μs * ∼100% -609%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4362 μs * ∼93% -557%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2396.6 μs * ∼51% -261%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1366.3 μs * ∼29% -106%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1169.3 μs * ∼25% -76%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	664.4 μs * ∼14%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Urządzenia do przechowywania danych

Nasze urządzenie jest dostarczane z dyskiem 1 TB Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR który jest jednym z najszybszych konsumenckich dysków SSD PCIe4 x4 NVMe dostępnych obecnie na rynku. Niestety, dysk w naszym egzemplarzu wykazuje problemy z utrzymaniem maksymalnych prędkości transferu przez dłuższy czas, co pokazuje poniższy wykres testu warunków skrajnych. Dla porównania, Razer Blade 15 z tym samym dyskiem Samsunga jest w stanie utrzymać transfer na poziomie 6700 MB/s bez żadnych problemów.

Obsługa maksymalnie dwóch dysków SSD PCIe4 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Dedykowany rozpraszacz ciepła dla dwóch dysków SSD. Wydajność dysków SSD w naszych testach była jednak nadal dławiona

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7030 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5040 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 669.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 494.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2635 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3276 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 61.83 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 130.1 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	78.8 pt ∼79%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	72 pt ∼72%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	71.4 pt ∼71%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	54.2 pt ∼54%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	53.8 pt ∼54%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	47 pt ∼47%

DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5598 (5462.22^min - 5597.85^max) MB/s ∼100% +46%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3889 (3873.65^min - 3888.73^max) MB/s ∼69% +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3872 (3855.82^min - 3871.97^max) MB/s ∼69% +1%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3834 (3626.9^min - 3834.31^max) MB/s ∼68%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3428 (3412.07^min - 3428.49^max) MB/s ∼61% -11%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2578 (2552.79^min - 2578.03^max) MB/s ∼46% -33%
seq write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7533 (7482.85^min - 7532.79^max) MB/s ∼100% +179%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4242 (4225.7^min - 4241.7^max) MB/s ∼56% +57%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3798 (3750.39^min - 3798.15^max) MB/s ∼50% +41%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3243 (3188.93^min - 3243.04^max) MB/s ∼43% +20%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3115 (2904.62^min - 3115.38^max) MB/s ∼41% +15%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2700 (2597.32^min - 2699.87^max) MB/s ∼36%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11242 (10740.3^min - 11242.2^max) MB/s ∼100% +79%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6861 MB/s ∼61% +10%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6810 (6260.27^min - 6809.87^max) MB/s ∼61% +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6384 (5573.36^min - 6384.17^max) MB/s ∼57% +2%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6264 (5914.09^min - 6264.25^max) MB/s ∼56%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4719 (4052.12^min - 4719.01^max) MB/s ∼42% -25%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9942 (9912.92^min - 9941.76^max) MB/s ∼100% +103%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5043 (5032.12^min - 5043.21^max) MB/s ∼51% +3%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4905 (4886.66^min - 4904.61^max) MB/s ∼49%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4831 (4610.18^min - 4830.79^max) MB/s ∼49% -2%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4426 (4263.58^min - 4426.04^max) MB/s ∼45% -10%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3629 MB/s ∼37% -26%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	83.1 (79.37^min - 83.07^max) MB/s ∼100% +39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	79.1 (78.08^min - 79.08^max) MB/s ∼95% +32%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	74.5 (73.46^min - 74.52^max) MB/s ∼90% +25%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	59.8 (59.59^min - 59.78^max) MB/s ∼72%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	52.5 (50.71^min - 52.46^max) MB/s ∼63% -12%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	37.7 (37.23^min - 37.65^max) MB/s ∼45% -37%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	286 (269.48^min - 285.84^max) MB/s ∼100% +131%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	280 (267.82^min - 279.79^max) MB/s ∼98% +126%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	213 (205.52^min - 212.72^max) MB/s ∼74% +72%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	195.1 (194.02^min - 195.09^max) MB/s ∼68% +57%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	126.7 (123.88^min - 126.69^max) MB/s ∼44% +2%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	124 (123.44^min - 123.99^max) MB/s ∼43%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4483 (4465.42^min - 4482.78^max) MB/s ∼100% +230%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3203 (3180.36^min - 3203.41^max) MB/s ∼71% +136%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2769 MB/s ∼62% +104%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1469 (1266.81^min - 1469.47^max) MB/s ∼33% +8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1359 (1291.24^min - 1359.27^max) MB/s ∼30%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	843 (833.55^min - 843.1^max) MB/s ∼19% -38%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4383 (4358.15^min - 4383.06^max) MB/s ∼100% +787%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2635 (2459.5^min - 2634.95^max) MB/s ∼60% +433%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2209 (1041.25^min - 2208.74^max) MB/s ∼50% +347%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1424 (1251.47^min - 1423.75^max) MB/s ∼32% +188%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	494 (480^min - 493.6^max) MB/s ∼11%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	288 (123^min - 287.76^max) MB/s ∼7% -42%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9218 Points ∼100% +53%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7745 Points ∼84% +29%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6311 Points ∼68% +5%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6019 Points ∼65%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4850 Points ∼53% -19%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4008 Points ∼43% -33%
Score Read
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3490 Points ∼100% +85%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3428 Points ∼98% +82%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2446 Points ∼70% +30%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2035 Points ∼58% +8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1885 Points ∼54%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1250 Points ∼36% -34%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4113 Points ∼100% +27%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3235 Points ∼79%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2658 Points ∼65% -18%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2566 Points ∼62% -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2211 Points ∼54% -32%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1877 Points ∼46% -42%
Seq Read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9511 MB/s ∼100% +133%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5770.79 MB/s ∼61% +42%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5157 MB/s ∼54% +26%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4716 MB/s ∼50% +16%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4077.84 MB/s ∼43%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3920 MB/s ∼41% -4%
Seq Write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7181 MB/s ∼100% +173%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3951.34 MB/s ∼55% +50%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3733 MB/s ∼52% +42%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3007 MB/s ∼42% +14%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2671 MB/s ∼37% +2%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2631.22 MB/s ∼37%
4K Read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	72.8 MB/s ∼100% +25%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	69.72 MB/s ∼96% +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	68.93 MB/s ∼95% +18%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	58.8 MB/s ∼81% +1%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	58.36 MB/s ∼80%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	49.14 MB/s ∼68% -16%
4K Write
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	249 MB/s ∼100% +46%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	241.69 MB/s ∼97% +42%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	177.9 MB/s ∼71% +4%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	170.35 MB/s ∼68%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	157.01 MB/s ∼63% -8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	120.14 MB/s ∼48% -29%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2843.31 MB/s ∼100% +100%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2842.96 MB/s ∼100% +100%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1995 MB/s ∼70% +41%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1418.53 MB/s ∼50%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1011 MB/s ∼36% -29%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	728.79 MB/s ∼26% -49%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3582.58 MB/s ∼100% +28%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2801.72 MB/s ∼78%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2108 MB/s ∼59% -25%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1929.02 MB/s ∼54% -31%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1824.12 MB/s ∼51% -35%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	981 MB/s ∼27% -65%
Access Time Read
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.094 ms * ∼100% -203%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.036 ms * ∼38% -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.034 ms * ∼36% -10%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.031 ms * ∼33% -0%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.031 ms * ∼33%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.026 ms * ∼28% +16%
Access Time Write
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.096 ms * ∼100% -52%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.063 ms * ∼66%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.056 ms * ∼58% +11%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.032 ms * ∼33% +49%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.025 ms * ∼26% +60%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.023 ms * ∼24% +63%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Recenzja laptopa Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2: MSI GT77 Titan wydajność bez rozmiarów

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Sprawa

Porównanie wielkości

Czytnik kart SD

Komunikacja

Kamera internetowa

Konserwacja

Akcesoria i gwarancja

Wyświetl

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Wydajność

Warunki badania

Procesor

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Wydajność systemu

Opóźnienie DPC

Urządzenia do przechowywania danych

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8