Recenzja Razer Blade 15 OLED (początek 2022 roku): Kompaktowy laptop do gier z RTX 3070 Ti

Razer Blade 15 (Early 2022) ma ambicje być laptopem zarówno dla graczy, jak i kreatywnych użytkowników. Na pokładzie znajduje się odpowiedni sprzęt: Core i9-12900HpROCESOR, GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU do laptopa i dokładny pod względem kolorów wyświetlacz OLED (QHD). Podobnych kompaktowych konkurentów można znaleźć w postaci m.in Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22), tj.Aorus 15 XE5,HP Omen 16, oraz.Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.
Informacje dotyczące obudowy, funkcji, urządzeń wejściowych i głośników są już pod ręką w naszej recenzji jego rodzeństwa, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). Ten ostatni wyposażony jest w panel LED (QHD) - najistotniejsza różnica względem obecnego urządzenia.
Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.9 % | 03/2023 | Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
87.8 % | 02/2023 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.5 % | 12/2022 | Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
87.4 % | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 21.65 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | ||
85.5 % | HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 |
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (26 - 269, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz | |
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1580, n=28, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz | |
Average of class Gaming (423 - 1700, n=28, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (1465 - 1762, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1857, n=67, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (917 - 1727, n=8) | |
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=136, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |

Wyświetlacz - mobilny komputer Razera przynosi ze sobą panel OLED
Wyświetlacz OLED oferuje te same kluczowe dane, co jego rodzeństwo z wyświetlaczem LED: Rozdzielczość 2560 x 1440 pikseli (QHD) przy częstotliwości odświeżania 240 Hz i przekątną 15,6 cala.
Typowo dla OLED-ów, panel zdobywa punkty za wspaniałe poziomy czerni i szybki czas reakcji. Do tego dochodzi stosunkowo wysoka jasność maksymalna. Jest to coś, do czego jego LED-owy odpowiednik nie może się przyczepić.
Słabe strony panelu OLED: Ma on błyszczącą powierzchnię i migocze przy ustawieniu jasności na poziomie ≤ 70 procent z częstotliwością 500 Hz. Technicznie uwarunkowane migotanie jest związane z regulacją jasności panelu. Pod tym względem, matowa, niemigocząca dioda LED matowy, niemigoczący panel LED ma nosa do przodu.
|
rozświetlenie: 99 %
na akumulatorze: 381 cd/m²
kontrast: 12767:1 (czerń: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Aorus 15 XE5 Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10 | Razer Blade 15 2022 Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -6% | -4% | -20% | -17% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.6 | 92.8 -5% | 95.2 -2% | 67.3 -31% | 71 -27% | 99.1 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 98.5 -1% | 99.9 1% | 96.7 -3% | 97.9 -2% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94 | 83.1 -12% | 84.5 -10% | 68.2 -27% | 73.3 -22% | 86.8 -8% |
Response Times | -340% | -475% | -365% | -498% | -550% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 7.6 ? -280% | 14.4 ? -620% | 11.6 ? -480% | 14.5 ? -625% | 14.4 ? -620% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 10 ? -400% | 8.6 ? -330% | 7 ? -250% | 9.4 ? -370% | 11.6 ? -480% |
PWM Frequency | 500 ? | |||||
Screen | -96% | -169% | -178% | -184% | -106% | |
Brightness middle | 383 | 497 30% | 336 -12% | 326 -15% | 335 -13% | 286 -25% |
Brightness | 384 | 481 25% | 316 -18% | 303 -21% | 319 -17% | 271 -29% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 82 -17% | 89 -10% | 89 -10% | 90 -9% | 89 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.21 -600% | 0.34 -1033% | 0.33 -1000% | 0.28 -833% | 0.25 -733% |
Contrast | 12767 | 2367 -81% | 988 -92% | 988 -92% | 1196 -91% | 1144 -91% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.89 | 3.53 -87% | 3.36 -78% | 2.73 -44% | 4.38 -132% | 2.74 -45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.76 | 6.15 -64% | 6.67 -77% | 9.54 -154% | 9.48 -152% | 5.21 -39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.67 | 3.53 -32% | 0.74 72% | 1.36 49% | 1.33 50% | 2.52 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.26 | 1.74 -38% | 4.7 -273% | 5.2 -313% | 7 -456% | 1.1 13% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.2 100% | 2.244 98% | 2.074 106% | 2.103 105% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6386 102% | 6418 101% | 6897 94% | 6911 94% | 6244 104% | 6408 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -147% /
-112% | -216% /
-177% | -188% /
-171% | -233% /
-193% | -219% /
-147% |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
Nawet po wyjęciu z pudełka wyświetlacz zapewnia imponujące odwzorowanie kolorów: Przy odchyleniu 1,9 cel (DeltaE < 3) jest wyraźnie spełniony. Kalibracja nie prowadzi do żadnej poprawy. Dokładność kolorów podano: Przestrzenie barw sRGB i DCI-P3 są odwzorowywane całkowicie i prawie całkowicie, przy czym przestrzeń barw AdobeRGB na poziomie 94 procent. Na stronie panel LED rodzeństwa również zapewnia podobnie dobre wyniki.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 500 Hz | ≤ 70 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18694 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Wydajność - Blade 15 jest oparty na Alder Lake i Ampere
Dzięki Blade 15 (początek 2022 roku) Razer ma w swojej ofercie laptopa przeznaczonego do gier w rozdzielczości QHD (ustawienia wysokie do maksymalnych), ale także świetnie radzi sobie w takich dziedzinach jak edycja i renderowanie wideo. Recenzowany tu model można mieć za około 1 967 dolarów.
Warunki badania
Możliwe jest przełączanie się pomiędzy trzema trybami wydajności ("Balanced", "Silent" i "User-defined") za pomocą kombinacji klawiszy "Fn" + "P". Profil "User-defined" pozwala na ustawienia subpresetów dla CPU ("Low", "Medium", "High", "Boost") i GPU ("Low", "Medium" i "High") - poprzez preinstalowane oprogramowanie Razer Synapse. W trybie bateryjnym dostępny jest tylko profil "Balanced".
Benchmarki przeprowadzono z wykorzystaniem aktywnego trybu "User-defined" przy maksymalnych ustawieniach (podprogramy "Boost" i "High"). Do testu akumulatora wykorzystano profil "Silent".
Procesor
Na stronie .Core i9-12900Hprocesor (Alder Lake) składa się z sześciu rdzeni wydajnościowych (hyperthreading, 2,5 do 5 GHz) i ośmiu rdzeni efektywnościowych (bez hyperthreadingu, 1,8 do 3,8 GHz). W sumie jest 20 logicznych rdzeni procesora.
Test wielowątkowy benchmarku Cinebench R15 był przetwarzany z częstotliwością 3,6 do 3,8 GHz (rdzenie P) i 2,8 do 2,9 GHz (rdzenie E). Test jednowątkowy przeprowadziliśmy odpowiednio przy 1,4 do 4,5 GHz (rdzenie P) i 1,5 do 3,5 GHz (rdzenie E). W trybie akumulatorowym taktowania są niższe. Pokazuje to test pętli CB15: Obciążenie wielowątkowe jest konfrontowane z wysoką prędkością zegara turbo tylko przez krótki czas. Po 30-40 sekundach wartości te spadają do mniej więcej bazowego taktowania.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=237, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7359 - 19648, n=24) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Single Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1634 - 1921, n=24) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2681 - 7471, n=24) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (624 - 738, n=24) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=241, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1395 - 3077, n=24) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (235 - 277, n=25) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 451, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34684 - 76677, n=25) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=233, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=25) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Multi-Core | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=26) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1631 - 1892, n=26) | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8.05 - 22.5, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=231, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36.8 - 59.8, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.506, n=25) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 60169, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 252486, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=25) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78172 - 111241, n=25) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=25) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 134044, n=229, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 328679, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 31796, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=25) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=26) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 60161, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Wydajność systemu
System działa płynnie i niezawodnie oraz zapewnia wystarczającą moc dla wymagających obszarów zastosowań, takich jak renderowanie, edycja wideo i gry. Transfery pamięci RAM są na normalnym poziomie dla pamięci DDR5-4800, a dopełnieniem tego są dobre wyniki PC-Mark.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2295, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2166, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2275, n=160, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5101 pkt. | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5789 pkt. | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7336 pkt. | |
Pomoc |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=25) | |
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 88014, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 89096, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 67858, n=25) | |
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 103259, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (88 - 118.1, n=24) | |
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 136.8, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
Opóźnienia DPC
Standardowy test monitora latencji (surfowanie po internecie, odtwarzanie wideo 4k, wysokie obciążenie Prime95) wykazał anomalie. System nie wydaje się być odpowiedni do edycji wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą jednak doprowadzić do poprawy lub pogorszenia wydajności.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
Pamięć masowa
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming |
DiskSpd | |
seq read | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (1761 - 4677, n=74) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (1291 - 6045, n=199, last 2 years) | |
seq write | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9108, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2220 - 4564, n=74) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
seq q8 t1 read | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (3421 - 7061, n=74) | |
Average of class Gaming (1620 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years) | |
seq q8 t1 write | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2216 - 5259, n=74) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (86.2 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
4k q1 t1 read | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (48.4 - 97.4, n=74) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 97.4, n=199, last 2 years) | |
4k q1 t1 write | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (49.9 - 280, n=74) | |
4k q32 t16 read | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (313 - 5870, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (376 - 4185, n=74) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
4k q32 t16 write | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (288 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (291 - 3559, n=74) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AS SSD | |
Score Total | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2577 - 9147, n=75) | |
Average of class Gaming (1923 - 10783, n=186, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Score Read | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (528 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (983 - 3469, n=75) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Score Write | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (921 - 4043, n=75) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (515 - 5339, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Seq Read | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2638 - 5621, n=75) | |
Average of class Gaming (1473 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Seq Write | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (1617 - 4526, n=75) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
4K Read | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (45.9 - 89.2, n=75) | |
Average of class Gaming (28.8 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years) |