Recenzja Razer Blade 15 OLED (początek 2022 roku): Kompaktowy laptop do gier z RTX 3070 Ti

Ponownie polerowane. Obecne wcielenie Blade 15 nadal opiera się na mocnym sprzęcie Alder Lake i Ampere, ale oferuje również kuszącą aktualizację: Razer postawił na wyświetlacz OLED o wysokim kontraście (QHD), z wysoką częstotliwością odświeżania (240 Hz) i doskonałym pokryciem przestrzeni barw.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (tłumaczenie DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/03/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

Razer Blade 15 (Early 2022) ma ambicje być laptopem zarówno dla graczy, jak i kreatywnych użytkowników. Na pokładzie znajduje się odpowiedni sprzęt: Core i9-12900HpROCESOR, GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU do laptopa i dokładny pod względem kolorów wyświetlacz OLED (QHD). Podobnych kompaktowych konkurentów można znaleźć w postaci m.in Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22), tj.Aorus 15 XE5,HP Omen 16, oraz.Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.

Informacje dotyczące obudowy, funkcji, urządzeń wejściowych i głośników są już pod ręką w naszej recenzji jego rodzeństwa, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). Ten ostatni wyposażony jest w panel LED (QHD) - najistotniejsza różnica względem obecnego urządzenia.

Test device courtesy of Razer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)

Procesor

Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P

Karta grafiki

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 1035 MHz, pamięć: 1500 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus

Pamięć

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both are used)

Matryca

15.60 cali 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pikseli 188 PPI, Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, refleksująca: tak, 240 Hz

Chipset

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Dysk twardy

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB

, 2 M.2-2280 slots (PCIe 4), 893 GB wolne miejsce

Złącza

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: Headset combined port, czytnik kart: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Łączność

Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1

Gabaryty

wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 16.99 x 355 x 235

Akumulator

80 Wh, 5209 mAh litowo-jonowy

System operacyjny

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

kamerka: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Inne

głośniki: Stereo, klawiatura: Chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji

Waga

2.01 kg, zasilacz: 790 g

Cena

3249 Euro

Odnośniki

Razer strona producenta

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

pełna specyfikacja

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.9 %	03/2023	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
87.8 %	02/2023	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.5 %	12/2022	Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	24 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
87.4 %		Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	21.65 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
85.5 %		HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23 mm	16.10"	2560x1440

Porównanie wielkości

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Aorus 15 XE5 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) DIN A4 ❌

Prawa strona: Czytnik kart pamięci (SD), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, gniazdo na blokadę kabli

Lewy bok: Złącze zasilania, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), łączone gniazdo audio

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	165.4 MB/s ∼100% +105%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	138.1 (127.28^min - 140.64^max) MB/s ∼83% +71%
Average of class Gaming (18.5 - 222, n=90, last 2 years)	106.7 MB/s ∼65% +32%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.8 MB/s ∼49%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	77 MB/s ∼47% -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	60 MB/s ∼36% -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	261.31 MB/s ∼100% +211%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	182 MB/s ∼70% +116%
Average of class Gaming (20.5 - 269, n=80, last 2 years)	130.7 MB/s ∼50% +55%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.1 MB/s ∼32%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022	1528 (1341^min - 1654^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1160 MBit/s ∼76%
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1588, n=84, last 2 years)	1152 MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022	1470 (1448^min - 1522^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1470 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=84, last 2 years)	1174 MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1692 (1588^min - 1709^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1664 (1336^min - 1741^max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1655 (1550^min - 1681^max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (1465 - 1762, n=4)	1601 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (886 - 1857, n=33, last 2 years)	1554 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1619 (1564^min - 1655^max) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1612 (817^min - 1646^max) MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1477 (1339^min - 1623^max) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=71, last 2 years)	1459 MBit/s ∼90% -1%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (917 - 1727, n=7)	1448 MBit/s ∼89% -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921	967 (489^min - 981^max) MBit/s ∼60% -35%

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (842-1702)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1588-1709)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)

Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1336-1741)

ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022): 9.02 ∆E min: 4.05 - max: 13.82 ∆E

Wyświetlacz - mobilny komputer Razera przynosi ze sobą panel OLED

Wyświetlacz OLED oferuje te same kluczowe dane, co jego rodzeństwo z wyświetlaczem LED: Rozdzielczość 2560 x 1440 pikseli (QHD) przy częstotliwości odświeżania 240 Hz i przekątną 15,6 cala.

Typowo dla OLED-ów, panel zdobywa punkty za wspaniałe poziomy czerni i szybki czas reakcji. Do tego dochodzi stosunkowo wysoka jasność maksymalna. Jest to coś, do czego jego LED-owy odpowiednik nie może się przyczepić.

Słabe strony panelu OLED: Ma on błyszczącą powierzchnię i migocze przy ustawieniu jasności na poziomie ≤ 70 procent z częstotliwością 500 Hz. Technicznie uwarunkowane migotanie jest związane z regulacją jasności panelu. Pod tym względem, matowa, niemigocząca dioda LED matowy, niemigoczący panel LED ma nosa do przodu.


385 cd/m²	382 cd/m²	384 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	383 cd/m²	386 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	387 cd/m²

podświetlenie ekranu

Samsung ATNA562P02-0

X-Rite i1Pro 2

maksimum: 387 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 383.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 99 %
na akumulatorze: 381 cd/m²
kontrast: 12767:1 (czerń: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Download Plik ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Aorus 15 XE5 Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60	Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60	HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10	Razer Blade 15 2022 Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Display		-6%	-4%	-20%	-17%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	97.6	92.8 -5%	95.2 -2%	67.3 -31%	71 -27%	99.1 2%
sRGB Coverage	99.4	98.5 -1%	99.9 1%	96.7 -3%	97.9 -2%	99.9 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	94	83.1 -12%	84.5 -10%	68.2 -27%	73.3 -22%	86.8 -8%
Response Times		-340%	-475%	-365%	-498%	-550%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	2 ?(1, 1)	7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2) -280%	14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5) -620%	11.6 ?(5.6, 6) -480%	14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3) -625%	14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6) -620%
Response Time Black / White *	2 ?(1, 1)	10 ?(4.6, 5.4) -400%	8.6 ?(5.1, 3.5) -330%	7 ?(3.3, 3.7) -250%	9.4 ?(4.4, 5) -370%	11.6 ?(5.6, 6) -480%
PWM Frequency	500 ?(70)
Screen		-96%	-169%	-178%	-184%	-106%
Brightness middle	383	497 30%	336 -12%	326 -15%	335 -13%	286 -25%
Brightness	384	481 25%	316 -18%	303 -21%	319 -17%	271 -29%
Brightness Distribution	99	82 -17%	89 -10%	89 -10%	90 -9%	89 -10%
Black Level *	0.03	0.21 -600%	0.34 -1033%	0.33 -1000%	0.28 -833%	0.25 -733%
Contrast	12767	2367 -81%	988 -92%	988 -92%	1196 -91%	1144 -91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.89	3.53 -87%	3.36 -78%	2.73 -44%	4.38 -132%	2.74 -45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.76	6.15 -64%	6.67 -77%	9.54 -154%	9.48 -152%	5.21 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.67	3.53 -32%	0.74 72%	1.36 49%	1.33 50%	2.52 6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.26	1.74 -38%	4.7 -273%	5.2 -313%	7 -456%	1.1 13%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.2 ^100%	2.244 ^98%	2.074 ^106%	2.103 ^105%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6386 ^102%	6418 ^101%	6897 ^94%	6911 ^94%	6244 ^104%	6408 ^101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-147% / -112%	-216% / -177%	-188% / -171%	-233% / -193%	-219% / -147%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Nawet po wyjęciu z pudełka wyświetlacz zapewnia imponujące odwzorowanie kolorów: Przy odchyleniu 1,9 cel (DeltaE < 3) jest wyraźnie spełniony. Kalibracja nie prowadzi do żadnej poprawy. Dokładność kolorów podano: Przestrzenie barw sRGB i DCI-P3 są odwzorowywane całkowicie i prawie całkowicie, przy czym przestrzeń barw AdobeRGB na poziomie 94 procent. Na stronie panel LED rodzeństwa również zapewnia podobnie dobre wyniki.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

500 Hz

≤ 70 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19232 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Panel charakteryzuje się dużą stabilnością kątów widzenia i jest czytelny pod każdym kątem. Na zewnątrz jest to jednak trudne ze względu na błyszczącą, odbijającą światło powierzchnię wyświetlacza.

Wydajność - Blade 15 jest oparty na Alder Lake i Ampere

Dzięki Blade 15 (początek 2022 roku) Razer ma w swojej ofercie laptopa przeznaczonego do gier w rozdzielczości QHD (ustawienia wysokie do maksymalnych), ale także świetnie radzi sobie w takich dziedzinach jak edycja i renderowanie wideo. Recenzowany tu model można mieć za około 1 967 dolarów.

Warunki badania

Możliwe jest przełączanie się pomiędzy trzema trybami wydajności ("Balanced", "Silent" i "User-defined") za pomocą kombinacji klawiszy "Fn" + "P". Profil "User-defined" pozwala na ustawienia subpresetów dla CPU ("Low", "Medium", "High", "Boost") i GPU ("Low", "Medium" i "High") - poprzez preinstalowane oprogramowanie Razer Synapse. W trybie bateryjnym dostępny jest tylko profil "Balanced".

Benchmarki przeprowadzono z wykorzystaniem aktywnego trybu "User-defined" przy maksymalnych ustawieniach (podprogramy "Boost" i "High"). Do testu akumulatora wykorzystano profil "Silent".

Procesor

Na stronie .Core i9-12900Hprocesor (Alder Lake) składa się z sześciu rdzeni wydajnościowych (hyperthreading, 2,5 do 5 GHz) i ośmiu rdzeni efektywnościowych (bez hyperthreadingu, 1,8 do 3,8 GHz). W sumie jest 20 logicznych rdzeni procesora.

Test wielowątkowy benchmarku Cinebench R15 był przetwarzany z częstotliwością 3,6 do 3,8 GHz (rdzenie P) i 2,8 do 2,9 GHz (rdzenie E). Test jednowątkowy przeprowadziliśmy odpowiednio przy 1,4 do 4,5 GHz (rdzenie P) i 1,5 do 3,5 GHz (rdzenie E). W trybie akumulatorowym taktowania są niższe. Pokazuje to test pętli CB15: Obciążenie wielowątkowe jest konfrontowane z wysoką prędkością zegara turbo tylko przez krótki czas. Po 30-40 sekundach wartości te spadają do mniej więcej bazowego taktowania.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)

Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1427 (1394.46-1547.03)

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)

Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)

Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy pętli CB15 (Max)

Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy w pętli CB15 (Balanced)

Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy w pętli CB15 (Silent)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	83.1 pt ∼83%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	81.8 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	79.7 pt ∼80%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	78.1 pt ∼78%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	74.8 pt ∼75%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	74.7 pt ∼75%
Average of class Gaming	72.5 pt ∼73%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	57.9 pt ∼58%

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	16253 Points ∼100% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	16170 Points ∼99% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7647 - 19648, n=22)	15902 Points ∼98% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	15870 Points ∼98% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	15600 Points ∼96%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=229, last 2 years)	15408 Points ∼95% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	14893 (13078^min - 14893.1^max) Points ∼92% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	10742 Points ∼66% -31%
Single Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1871 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1698 - 1921, n=22)	1838 Points ∼98% +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1799 Points ∼96% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1796 Points ∼96% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	1759 Points ∼94% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1721 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=226, last 2 years)	1638 Points ∼88% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1515 Points ∼81% -12%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6053 Points ∼100% +1%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	6044 Points ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	6007 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2922 - 7471, n=22)	5985 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5892 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13457, n=232, last 2 years)	5810 Points ∼96% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5731 Points ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	4148 Points ∼69% -31%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	715 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (653 - 738, n=22)	712 Points ∼100% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	695 Points ∼97% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	690 Points ∼97% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	683 Points ∼96% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	662 Points ∼93%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=232, last 2 years)	631 Points ∼88% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	580 Points ∼81% -12%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	2813 (2455.34^min - 2812.94^max) Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	2711 Points ∼96% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	2586 (2431.02^min - 2585.82^max) Points ∼92% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1561 - 3077, n=22)	2578 Points ∼92% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	2543 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5554, n=237, last 2 years)	2475 Points ∼88% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	2178 (2061.43^min - 2178.41^max) Points ∼77% -14%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1547 Points ∼55% -39%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (243 - 277, n=23)	264 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	263 Points ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Points ∼99% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	258 Points ∼98% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	257 Points ∼97% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	249 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=233, last 2 years)	247 Points ∼94% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	229 Points ∼87% -8%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	309 Seconds * ∼100% -40%
Average of class Gaming (93 - 1259, n=234, last 2 years)	243 Seconds * ∼79% -10%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	236 Seconds * ∼76% -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	226 Seconds * ∼73% -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	220 Seconds * ∼71%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 415, n=22)	215 Seconds * ∼70% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	195 Seconds * ∼63% +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	182.7 Seconds * ∼59% +17%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	72679 MIPS ∼100% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	66057 MIPS ∼91% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	63825 MIPS ∼88%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (37614 - 76677, n=22)	63631 MIPS ∼88% 0%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 135927, n=229, last 2 years)	62802 MIPS ∼86% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	61936 MIPS ∼85% -3%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	58296 MIPS ∼80% -9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	47298 MIPS ∼65% -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6192 MIPS ∼100% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=22)	5869 MIPS ∼95% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5863 MIPS ∼95% +9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	5739 MIPS ∼93% +7%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7332, n=230, last 2 years)	5735 MIPS ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5726 MIPS ∼92% +7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	5492 MIPS ∼89% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	5367 MIPS ∼87%

Geekbench 5.4
Multi-Core
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	13500 Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	12832 Points ∼95% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	12753 Points ∼94% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=23)	12461 Points ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	12434 Points ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	12215 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 21853, n=228, last 2 years)	11009 Points ∼82% -10%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	8261 Points ∼61% -32%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1841 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1647 - 1892, n=23)	1815 Points ∼99% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1810 Points ∼98% +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1758 Points ∼95% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	1728 Points ∼94% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1661 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=228, last 2 years)	1649 Points ∼90% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1579 Points ∼86% -5%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	20 fps ∼100% +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	18.9 fps ∼95% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (9.16 - 22.5, n=22)	18.1 fps ∼91% +5%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 34.8, n=234, last 2 years)	17.5 fps ∼88% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	17.3 fps ∼87%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	17.2 fps ∼86% -1%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	16.2 fps ∼81% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	12.8 fps ∼64% -26%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	51.5 s * ∼100% -2%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=230, last 2 years)	51.2 s * ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	50.7 s * ∼98%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	47.5 s * ∼92% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (38 - 59.8, n=22)	43.3 s * ∼84% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	42.2 s * ∼82% +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	41 s * ∼80% +19%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	37.5 s * ∼73% +26%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	0.557 sec * ∼100% -11%
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=230, last 2 years)	0.514 sec * ∼92% -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	0.503 sec * ∼90%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	0.4715 sec * ∼85% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4647 sec * ∼83% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4489 sec * ∼81% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.503, n=22)	0.4486 sec * ∼81% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4352 sec * ∼78% +13%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2543 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

213 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

249 Points

Pomoc

... porównanie

Performance Rating
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95.2 pt ∼95%
Average of class Gaming	89.4 pt ∼89%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88.2 pt ∼88%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	83.2 pt ∼83%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	82.4 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	79.7 pt ∼80%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	69.6 pt ∼70%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66.5 pt ∼67%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	15387 KRay/s ∼100% +14%
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 52479, n=202, last 2 years)	14065 KRay/s ∼91% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	13493 KRay/s ∼88%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12736 KRay/s ∼83% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	12680 KRay/s ∼82% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=22)	11115 KRay/s ∼72% -18%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	7671 KRay/s ∼50% -43%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7636 KRay/s ∼50% -43%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	74919 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 227882, n=202, last 2 years)	74815 Points ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	71736 Points ∼96%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63698 Points ∼85% -11%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	61649 Points ∼82% -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=22)	54800 Points ∼73% -24%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36695 Points ∼49% -49%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36195 Points ∼48% -50%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	4107 MB/s ∼100% +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3545 MB/s ∼86% +4%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 8525, n=202, last 2 years)	3530 MB/s ∼86% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3400 MB/s ∼83%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=22)	3158 MB/s ∼77% -7%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3023 MB/s ∼74% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2681 MB/s ∼65% -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2673 MB/s ∼65% -21%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106137 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105420 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78668 - 111241, n=22)	103601 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	102811 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99861 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 180473, n=202, last 2 years)	99138 Points ∼93% -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	93492 Points ∼88% -12%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	86848 Points ∼82% -18%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 29598, n=202, last 2 years)	10890 Points ∼100% +12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9706 Points ∼89%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9538 Points ∼88% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=22)	9371 Points ∼86% -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9247 Points ∼85% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9205 Points ∼85% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	8872 Points ∼81% -9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8654 Points ∼79% -11%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 118401, n=202, last 2 years)	40176 Points ∼100% +18%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	37197 Points ∼93% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36496 Points ∼91% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34034 Points ∼85%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	31084 Points ∼77% -9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=22)	28698 Points ∼71% -16%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	21312 Points ∼53% -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	21106 Points ∼53% -38%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	135380 MB/s ∼100% +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	128492 MB/s ∼95% +30%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	113172 MB/s ∼84% +14%
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 236139, n=202, last 2 years)	104245 MB/s ∼77% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99217 MB/s ∼73%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=22)	90046 MB/s ∼67% -9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	85401 MB/s ∼63% -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55775 MB/s ∼41% -44%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1064 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	993 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=22)	974 MB/s ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	948 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	928 MB/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2090, n=223, last 2 years)	892 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	860 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	690 MB/s ∼65% -35%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8316 KRay/s ∼100% +14%
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 28105, n=202, last 2 years)	7642 KRay/s ∼92% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7268 KRay/s ∼87%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	6946 KRay/s ∼84% -4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	6843 KRay/s ∼82% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=22)	6214 KRay/s ∼75% -15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	4457 KRay/s ∼54% -39%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4173 KRay/s ∼50% -43%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42574 MPixel/s ∼100% +23%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40992 MPixel/s ∼96% +19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	40868 MPixel/s ∼96% +18%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=23)	36969 MPixel/s ∼87% +7%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	35065 MPixel/s ∼82% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34573 MPixel/s ∼81%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34312 MPixel/s ∼81% -1%
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 51096, n=203, last 2 years)	30209 MPixel/s ∼71% -13%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	26692 MPixel/s ∼63% -23%

Wydajność systemu

System działa płynnie i niezawodnie oraz zapewnia wystarczającą moc dla wymagających obszarów zastosowań, takich jak renderowanie, edycja wideo i gry. Transfery pamięci RAM są na normalnym poziomie dla pamięci DDR5-4800, a dopełnieniem tego są dobre wyniki PC-Mark.

Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dual-channel.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7871 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6)	7712 Points ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7706 Points ∼98% +5%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7695 Points ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7336 Points ∼93%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7322 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=190, last 2 years)	7174 Points ∼91% -2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6126 Points ∼78% -16%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10936 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6)	10807 Points ∼99% +5%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10764 Points ∼98% +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10708 Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12639, n=189, last 2 years)	10378 Points ∼95% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10328 Points ∼94%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10249 Points ∼94% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9544 Points ∼87% -8%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10352 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10187 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6)	10153 Points ∼98% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10024 Points ∼97%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	9581 Points ∼93% -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	9549 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=189, last 2 years)	9353 Points ∼90% -7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	8571 Points ∼83% -14%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	12104 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11881 Points ∼98% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6)	11364 Points ∼94% +10%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	11099 Points ∼92% +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10888 Points ∼90% +5%
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=189, last 2 years)	10374 Points ∼86% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10350 Points ∼86%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7627 Points ∼63% -26%

CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1947 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1884 Points ∼97% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6)	1871 Points ∼96% +8%
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2195, n=98, last 2 years)	1828 Points ∼94% +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1730 Points ∼89%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1656 Points ∼85% -4%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1887 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1797 Points ∼95% +10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6)	1784 Points ∼95% +9%
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2062, n=98, last 2 years)	1753 Points ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1641 Points ∼87%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1640 Points ∼87% 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2004 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6)	2004 Points ∼100% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1983 Points ∼99% +5%
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=98, last 2 years)	1963 Points ∼98% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1883 Points ∼94%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1692 Points ∼84% -10%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2022 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1803 Points ∼89% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6)	1759 Points ∼87% +12%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2230, n=98, last 2 years)	1687 Points ∼83% +7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1600 Points ∼79% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1573 Points ∼78%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5101 pkt.
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5789 pkt.
PCMark 10 Score		7336 pkt.
Pomoc

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63157 MB/s ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63110 MB/s ∼100% +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62522 MB/s ∼99% +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=22)	58799 MB/s ∼93% +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55639 MB/s ∼88%
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 78835, n=202, last 2 years)	51110 MB/s ∼81% -8%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	50524 MB/s ∼80% -9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	48120 MB/s ∼76% -14%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	67051 MB/s ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66496 MB/s ∼99% +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65933 MB/s ∼98% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61461 MB/s ∼92%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=22)	61346 MB/s ∼91% 0%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	57551 MB/s ∼86% -6%
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 86294, n=202, last 2 years)	54837 MB/s ∼82% -11%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	48849 MB/s ∼73% -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66275 MB/s ∼100% +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66074 MB/s ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	64272 MB/s ∼97% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 66275, n=22)	58343 MB/s ∼88% 0%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58294 MB/s ∼88% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58073 MB/s ∼88%
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 80441, n=202, last 2 years)	52040 MB/s ∼79% -10%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	46056 MB/s ∼69% -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.4 ns * ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95.1 ns * ∼96% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	94 ns * ∼95% +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.1 ns * ∼91% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88 ns * ∼89% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (88 - 118.1, n=21)	85 ns * ∼86% +14%
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 135.3, n=223, last 2 years)	69.8 ns * ∼70% +30%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienia DPC

Standardowy test monitora latencji (surfowanie po internecie, odtwarzanie wideo 4k, wysokie obciążenie Prime95) wykazał anomalie. System nie wydaje się być odpowiedni do edycji wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą jednak doprowadzić do poprawy lub pogorszenia wydajności.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3261 μs * ∼100% -249%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1364 μs * ∼42% -46%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1109.7 μs * ∼34% -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	945.7 μs * ∼29% -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	933.2 μs * ∼29%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	717.4 μs * ∼22% +23%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Pamięć masowa

Blade ma miejsce na dwa dyski SSD PCIe-4 w formacie M.2 2280. Zainstalowany dysk SSD PCIe-4 (1 TB) od Samsunga zapewnia bardzo dobre transfery. Spadki wydajności spowodowane throttlingiem termicznym nie występowały.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7098 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2442 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 643.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3732 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2413 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.2 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	91.4 pt ∼91%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	83.8 pt ∼84%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	78.5 pt ∼79%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	75.8 pt ∼76%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	75.7 pt ∼76%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	72 pt ∼72%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	70.8 pt ∼71%
Average of class Gaming	62.6 pt ∼63%

DiskSpd
seq read
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4199 (4194.93^min - 4199.13^max) MB/s ∼100% +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4119 (4098.66^min - 4118.81^max) MB/s ∼98% +16%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4117 (3552.16^min - 4116.81^max) MB/s ∼98% +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3928 (3889.8^min - 3927.66^max) MB/s ∼94% +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3764 (3540.2^min - 3763.76^max) MB/s ∼90% +6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (1761 - 4634, n=50)	3713 MB/s ∼88% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3564 (3515.46^min - 3563.69^max) MB/s ∼85%
Average of class Gaming (834 - 5676, n=188, last 2 years)	3099 MB/s ∼74% -13%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4767 (4365.51^min - 4766.62^max) MB/s ∼100% +35%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4299 (4288.86^min - 4298.95^max) MB/s ∼90% +22%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4236 (3477.46^min - 4236.46^max) MB/s ∼89% +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4167 (4120.63^min - 4166.62^max) MB/s ∼87% +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	4033 (3953.13^min - 4032.82^max) MB/s ∼85% +14%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2226 - 4516, n=50)	3557 MB/s ∼75% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3531 (3391.93^min - 3530.77^max) MB/s ∼74%
Average of class Gaming (399 - 7889, n=187, last 2 years)	3291 MB/s ∼69% -7%
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7020 (5888.98^min - 7020.02^max) MB/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6921 (6631.14^min - 6921.02^max) MB/s ∼99% +4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	6867 (6210.3^min - 6866.91^max) MB/s ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6847 (6590.72^min - 6846.78^max) MB/s ∼98% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6663 (6017.91^min - 6663.07^max) MB/s ∼95%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6550 (5497.59^min - 6549.73^max) MB/s ∼93% -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (3421 - 7061, n=50)	6371 MB/s ∼91% -4%
Average of class Gaming (1620 - 13195, n=188, last 2 years)	5382 MB/s ∼77% -19%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5412 (5265.32^min - 5411.99^max) MB/s ∼100% +9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4999 (4982.73^min - 4998.98^max) MB/s ∼92% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4980 (4904.66^min - 4979.58^max) MB/s ∼92%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4876 (4374.87^min - 4876.3^max) MB/s ∼90% -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2226 - 5259, n=50)	4815 MB/s ∼89% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4740 (4542.15^min - 4740.19^max) MB/s ∼88% -5%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4421 (4173.33^min - 4420.8^max) MB/s ∼82% -11%
Average of class Gaming (86.2 - 10261, n=188, last 2 years)	4033 MB/s ∼75% -19%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.2 (79.58^min - 81.23^max) MB/s ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	80.6 (67.84^min - 80.61^max) MB/s ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	79.6 (78.85^min - 79.63^max) MB/s ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	77.9 (77.66^min - 77.9^max) MB/s ∼96% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (48.7 - 97.4, n=50)	77.7 MB/s ∼96% -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	77.1 (76.91^min - 77.11^max) MB/s ∼95% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.3 (71.59^min - 74.33^max) MB/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming (23.3 - 97.4, n=188, last 2 years)	64.9 MB/s ∼80% -20%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	333 (331.94^min - 333.25^max) MB/s ∼100% +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	264 (263.57^min - 264.44^max) MB/s ∼79% +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	256 (23.49^min - 256.28^max) MB/s ∼77% +21%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	239 (238.19^min - 238.82^max) MB/s ∼72% +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	212 (209.62^min - 211.78^max) MB/s ∼64%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	205 (195.73^min - 204.56^max) MB/s ∼62% -3%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=187, last 2 years)	203 MB/s ∼61% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (49.9 - 275, n=50)	190.4 MB/s ∼57% -10%
4k q32 t16 read
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4309 (4179.96^min - 4309.38^max) MB/s ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4152 (4133.05^min - 4152.1^max) MB/s ∼96%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3566 (3562.85^min - 3566.11^max) MB/s ∼83% -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3184 (3180.75^min - 3183.86^max) MB/s ∼74% -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2855 (2482.75^min - 2854.87^max) MB/s ∼66% -31%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (376 - 4185, n=50)	2486 MB/s ∼58% -40%
Average of class Gaming (310 - 5829, n=187, last 2 years)	2313 MB/s ∼54% -44%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1528 (1477.56^min - 1527.59^max) MB/s ∼35% -63%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3600 (3594.9^min - 3599.81^max) MB/s ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3512 (3421.77^min - 3511.78^max) MB/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3435 (2876.62^min - 3435.27^max) MB/s ∼95% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2694 (2561.51^min - 2693.92^max) MB/s ∼75% -23%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2141 (2137.08^min - 2141.26^max) MB/s ∼59% -39%
Average of class Gaming (288 - 4383, n=187, last 2 years)	2025 MB/s ∼56% -42%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (291 - 3559, n=50)	1860 MB/s ∼52% -47%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	585 (555.77^min - 584.61^max) MB/s ∼16% -83%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9117 Points ∼100% +27%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	8376 Points ∼92% +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7659 Points ∼84% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7180 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6864 Points ∼75% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2577 - 9147, n=52)	6780 Points ∼74% -6%
Average of class Gaming (910 - 10330, n=177, last 2 years)	6236 Points ∼68% -13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5985 Points ∼66% -17%
Score Read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3576 Points ∼100% +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3431 Points ∼96% +20%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3123 Points ∼87% +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2858 Points ∼80%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit porównanie
HP Pavilion 11-n070eg x360 (min) N2820, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	46
...
R5 7600X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	2507
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2518
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	2518
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2543
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2580
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2586
HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2590
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (max) R9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	6236