Notebookcheck Logo

Recenzja Razer Blade 15 OLED (początek 2022 roku): Kompaktowy laptop do gier z RTX 3070 Ti

Ponownie polerowane. Obecne wcielenie Blade 15 nadal opiera się na mocnym sprzęcie Alder Lake i Ampere, ale oferuje również kuszącą aktualizację: Razer postawił na wyświetlacz OLED o wysokim kontraście (QHD), z wysoką częstotliwością odświeżania (240 Hz) i doskonałym pokryciem przestrzeni barw.
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

Razer Blade 15 (Early 2022) ma ambicje być laptopem zarówno dla graczy, jak i kreatywnych użytkowników. Na pokładzie znajduje się odpowiedni sprzęt: Core i9-12900HpROCESOR, GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU do laptopa i dokładny pod względem kolorów wyświetlacz OLED (QHD). Podobnych kompaktowych konkurentów można znaleźć w postaci m.in Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22), tj.Aorus 15 XE5,HP Omen 16, oraz.Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.

Informacje dotyczące obudowy, funkcji, urządzeń wejściowych i głośników są już pod ręką w naszej recenzji jego rodzeństwa, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). Ten ostatni wyposażony jest w panel LED (QHD) - najistotniejsza różnica względem obecnego urządzenia.

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Procesor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Karta grafiki
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 1035 MHz, pamięć: 1500 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus
Pamięć
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both are used)
Matryca
15.60 cali 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pikseli 188 PPI, Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, refleksująca: tak, 240 Hz
Chipset
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Dysk twardy
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 2 M.2-2280 slots (PCIe 4), 893 GB wolne miejsce
Złącza
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: Headset combined port, czytnik kart: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Łączność
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1
Gabaryty
wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 16.99 x 355 x 235
Akumulator
80 Wh, 5209 mAh litowo-jonowy
System operacyjny
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
kamerka: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Inne
głośniki: Stereo, klawiatura: Chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji
Waga
2.01 kg, zasilacz: 790 g
Cena
3249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.9 %
03/2023
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.8 %
02/2023
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.5 %
12/2022
Aorus 15 XE5
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.4 %
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg21.65 mm15.60"2560x1440
85.5 %
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm16.10"2560x1440

Porównanie wielkości

369 mm 248 mm 23 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 244 mm 24 mm 2.3 kg356.4 mm 233.8 mm 21.65 mm 1.9 kg355 mm 243 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Prawa strona: Czytnik kart pamięci (SD), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, gniazdo na blokadę kabli
Prawa strona: Czytnik kart pamięci (SD), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, gniazdo na blokadę kabli
Lewy bok: Złącze zasilania, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), łączone gniazdo audio
Lewy bok: Złącze zasilania, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), łączone gniazdo audio
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.4 MB/s +105%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
138.1 (127.28min - 140.64max) MB/s +71%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +22%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
80.8 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
60 MB/s -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
261.31 MB/s +211%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s +116%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s +44%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
84.1 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1528 (1341min - 1654max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  ()
1160 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1470 (1448min - 1522max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  ()
1470 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1692 (1588min - 1709max) MBit/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1664 (1336min - 1741max) MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1655 (1550min - 1681max) MBit/s -2%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (1465 - 1762, n=4)
1601 MBit/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1857, n=79, last 2 years)
1516 MBit/s -10%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1619 (1564min - 1655max) MBit/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1612 (817min - 1646max) MBit/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1477 (1339min - 1623max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (917 - 1727, n=8)
1477 MBit/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)
1403 MBit/s -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
MediaTek MT7921
967 (489min - 981max) MBit/s -35%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (842-1702)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1588-1709)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1336-1741)
ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022): 9.02 ∆E min: 4.05 - max: 13.82 ∆E

Wyświetlacz - mobilny komputer Razera przynosi ze sobą panel OLED

Pixelraster
Raster pikseli

Wyświetlacz OLED oferuje te same kluczowe dane, co jego rodzeństwo z wyświetlaczem LED: Rozdzielczość 2560 x 1440 pikseli (QHD) przy częstotliwości odświeżania 240 Hz i przekątną 15,6 cala.

Typowo dla OLED-ów, panel zdobywa punkty za wspaniałe poziomy czerni i szybki czas reakcji. Do tego dochodzi stosunkowo wysoka jasność maksymalna. Jest to coś, do czego jego LED-owy odpowiednik nie może się przyczepić.

Słabe strony panelu OLED: Ma on błyszczącą powierzchnię i migocze przy ustawieniu jasności na poziomie ≤ 70 procent z częstotliwością 500 Hz. Technicznie uwarunkowane migotanie jest związane z regulacją jasności panelu. Pod tym względem, matowa, niemigocząca dioda LED matowy, niemigoczący panel LED ma nosa do przodu.

385
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
podświetlenie ekranu
Samsung ATNA562P02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
maksimum: 387 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 383.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 99 %
na akumulatorze: 381 cd/m²
kontrast: 12767:1 (czerń: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Aorus 15 XE5
Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
Razer Blade 15 2022
Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Display
-6%
-4%
-20%
-17%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
97.6
92.8
-5%
95.2
-2%
67.3
-31%
71
-27%
99.1
2%
sRGB Coverage
99.4
98.5
-1%
99.9
1%
96.7
-3%
97.9
-2%
99.9
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
94
83.1
-12%
84.5
-10%
68.2
-27%
73.3
-22%
86.8
-8%
Response Times
-340%
-475%
-365%
-498%
-550%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)
-280%
14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5)
-620%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-480%
14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3)
-625%
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-620%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
10 ?(4.6, 5.4)
-400%
8.6 ?(5.1, 3.5)
-330%
7 ?(3.3, 3.7)
-250%
9.4 ?(4.4, 5)
-370%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-480%
PWM Frequency
500 ?(70)
Screen
-96%
-169%
-178%
-184%
-106%
Brightness middle
383
497
30%
336
-12%
326
-15%
335
-13%
286
-25%
Brightness
384
481
25%
316
-18%
303
-21%
319
-17%
271
-29%
Brightness Distribution
99
82
-17%
89
-10%
89
-10%
90
-9%
89
-10%
Black Level *
0.03
0.21
-600%
0.34
-1033%
0.33
-1000%
0.28
-833%
0.25
-733%
Contrast
12767
2367
-81%
988
-92%
988
-92%
1196
-91%
1144
-91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.89
3.53
-87%
3.36
-78%
2.73
-44%
4.38
-132%
2.74
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.76
6.15
-64%
6.67
-77%
9.54
-154%
9.48
-152%
5.21
-39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.67
3.53
-32%
0.74
72%
1.36
49%
1.33
50%
2.52
6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.26
1.74
-38%
4.7
-273%
5.2
-313%
7
-456%
1.1
13%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.244 98%
2.074 106%
2.103 105%
2.2 100%
CCT
6386 102%
6418 101%
6897 94%
6911 94%
6244 104%
6408 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-147% / -112%
-216% / -177%
-188% / -171%
-233% / -193%
-219% / -147%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Nawet po wyjęciu z pudełka wyświetlacz zapewnia imponujące odwzorowanie kolorów: Przy odchyleniu 1,9 cel (DeltaE < 3) jest wyraźnie spełniony. Kalibracja nie prowadzi do żadnej poprawy. Dokładność kolorów podano: Przestrzenie barw sRGB i DCI-P3 są odwzorowywane całkowicie i prawie całkowicie, przy czym przestrzeń barw AdobeRGB na poziomie 94 procent. Na stronie panel LED rodzeństwa również zapewnia podobnie dobre wyniki.

CalMAN - Sprawdzanie kolorów
CalMAN - Sprawdzanie kolorów
CalMAN - Szare łuski
CalMAN - Szare łuski
CalMAN - nasycenie koloru
CalMAN - nasycenie koloru
Blade vs. AdobeRGB
Blade vs. AdobeRGB
Blade vs. DCI P3
Blade vs. DCI P3
Blade vs. sRGB
Blade vs. sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 500 Hz ≤ 70 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Panel charakteryzuje się dużą stabilnością kątów widzenia i jest czytelny pod każdym kątem. Na zewnątrz jest to jednak trudne ze względu na błyszczącą, odbijającą światło powierzchnię wyświetlacza.

Blade na zewnątrz
Blade na zewnątrz
Kąt widzenia
Kąt widzenia

Wydajność - Blade 15 jest oparty na Alder Lake i Ampere

Dzięki Blade 15 (początek 2022 roku) Razer ma w swojej ofercie laptopa przeznaczonego do gier w rozdzielczości QHD (ustawienia wysokie do maksymalnych), ale także świetnie radzi sobie w takich dziedzinach jak edycja i renderowanie wideo. Recenzowany tu model można mieć za około 1 967 dolarów.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
Systeminfo

Warunki badania

Możliwe jest przełączanie się pomiędzy trzema trybami wydajności ("Balanced", "Silent" i "User-defined") za pomocą kombinacji klawiszy "Fn" + "P". Profil "User-defined" pozwala na ustawienia subpresetów dla CPU ("Low", "Medium", "High", "Boost") i GPU ("Low", "Medium" i "High") - poprzez preinstalowane oprogramowanie Razer Synapse. W trybie bateryjnym dostępny jest tylko profil "Balanced".

Benchmarki przeprowadzono z wykorzystaniem aktywnego trybu "User-defined" przy maksymalnych ustawieniach (podprogramy "Boost" i "High"). Do testu akumulatora wykorzystano profil "Silent".

Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse

Procesor

Na stronie .Core i9-12900Hprocesor (Alder Lake) składa się z sześciu rdzeni wydajnościowych (hyperthreading, 2,5 do 5 GHz) i ośmiu rdzeni efektywnościowych (bez hyperthreadingu, 1,8 do 3,8 GHz). W sumie jest 20 logicznych rdzeni procesora.

Test wielowątkowy benchmarku Cinebench R15 był przetwarzany z częstotliwością 3,6 do 3,8 GHz (rdzenie P) i 2,8 do 2,9 GHz (rdzenie E). Test jednowątkowy przeprowadziliśmy odpowiednio przy 1,4 do 4,5 GHz (rdzenie P) i 1,5 do 3,5 GHz (rdzenie E). W trybie akumulatorowym taktowania są niższe. Pokazuje to test pętli CB15: Obciążenie wielowątkowe jest konfrontowane z wysoką prędkością zegara turbo tylko przez krótki czas. Po 30-40 sekundach wartości te spadają do mniej więcej bazowego taktowania.

Wielowątkowość (moc ściany)
Wielowątkowość (moc ściany)
Jednowątkowy (zasilanie z sieci)
Jednowątkowy (zasilanie z sieci)

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1427 (1394.46-1547.03)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy pętli CB15 (Max)
Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy pętli CB15 (Max)
Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy w pętli CB15 (Balanced)
Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy w pętli CB15 (Balanced)
Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy w pętli CB15 (Silent)
Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy w pętli CB15 (Silent)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
82 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
79 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
77.9 pt
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
74.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
73.9 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
71.1 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
70.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
55.2 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=230, last 2 years)
19530 Points +25%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
16253 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
16170 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
15870 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
15600 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (7359 - 19648, n=25)
15301 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
10742 Points -31%
Single Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1871 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1634 - 1921, n=25)
1822 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=228, last 2 years)
1814 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1799 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
1759 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1721 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1515 Points -12%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=228, last 2 years)
7423 Points +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6053 Points +1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
6044 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
6007 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5892 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2681 - 7471, n=25)
5761 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4148 Points -31%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
715 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (624 - 738, n=25)
705 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=228, last 2 years)
698 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
695 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
683 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
662 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
580 Points -12%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=232, last 2 years)
3090 Points +22%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2813 (2455.34min - 2812.94max) Points +11%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
2711 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
2586 (2431.02min - 2585.82max) Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
2543 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1395 - 3077, n=25)
2482 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1547 Points -39%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=231, last 2 years)
268 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
263 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (235 - 277, n=26)
262 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
249 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points -8%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
309 Seconds * -40%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
236 Seconds * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (160 - 451, n=25)
229 Seconds * -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
220 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=226, last 2 years)
199.5 Seconds * +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
195 Seconds * +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
182.7 Seconds * +17%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=227, last 2 years)
77071 MIPS +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
72679 MIPS +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
66057 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
63825 MIPS
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34684 - 76677, n=25)
61535 MIPS -4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
58296 MIPS -9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47298 MIPS -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6192 MIPS +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=227, last 2 years)
6128 MIPS +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5863 MIPS +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5302 - 6289, n=25)
5835 MIPS +9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
5739 MIPS +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5492 MIPS +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
5367 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=232, last 2 years)
13583 Points +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
13500 Points +11%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
12832 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
12753 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
12215 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8519 - 14376, n=26)
12163 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
8261 Points -32%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1841 Points +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1810 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=232, last 2 years)
1809 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1631 - 1892, n=26)
1797 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
1728 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1661 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1579 Points -5%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=230, last 2 years)
21.2 fps +23%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
20 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
18.9 fps +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
17.3 fps
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8.05 - 22.5, n=25)
17.3 fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps -1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.2 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.8 fps -26%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
50.7 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=224, last 2 years)
49.2 s * +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36.8 - 59.8, n=25)
42.7 s * +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
42.2 s * +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
41 s * +19%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
37.5 s * +26%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.557 sec * -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.503 sec *
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=227, last 2 years)
0.4694 sec * +7%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4647 sec * +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (0.4218 - 0.506, n=25)
0.4547 sec * +10%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4489 sec * +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4352 sec * +13%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2543 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
213 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
249 Points
Pomoc
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
96.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
79.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
74.8 pt
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
74.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
70.4 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60.4 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=223, last 2 years)
18592 KRay/s +38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15387 KRay/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
13493 KRay/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12736 KRay/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
12680 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (4074 - 18289, n=25)
11031 KRay/s -18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7671 KRay/s -43%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7636 KRay/s -43%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=223, last 2 years)
93353 Points +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
74919 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
71736 Points
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63698 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61649 Points -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (22307 - 93236, n=25)
54480 Points -24%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36695 Points -49%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36195 Points -50%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=223, last 2 years)
4321 MB/s +27%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
4107 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3545 MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3400 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1378 - 4215, n=25)
3063 MB/s -10%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3023 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2681 MB/s -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2673 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=223, last 2 years)
109267 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106137 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105420 Points -1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102811 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (78172 - 111241, n=25)
101523 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99861 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93492 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86848 Points -18%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=223, last 2 years)
12182 Points +26%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9706 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9538 Points -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9247 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9205 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5709 - 10410, n=25)
9091 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8872 Points -9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8654 Points -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=223, last 2 years)
47787 Points +40%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
37197 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36496 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34034 Points
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
31084 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (11257 - 45581, n=25)
28345 Points -17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21312 Points -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
21106 Points -38%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
135380 MB/s +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
128492 MB/s +30%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
113172 MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=223, last 2 years)
107708 MB/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99217 MB/s
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85401 MB/s -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (31935 - 151546, n=25)
85224 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55775 MB/s -44%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=223, last 2 years)
1209 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1064 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
993 MB/s -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
948 MB/s -11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (449 - 1193, n=25)
941 MB/s -12%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
928 MB/s -13%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
860 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
690 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=223, last 2 years)
10067 KRay/s +39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8316 KRay/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7268 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
6946 KRay/s -4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
6843 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2235 - 10511, n=25)
6131 KRay/s -16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4457 KRay/s -39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4173 KRay/s -43%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42574 MPixel/s +23%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40992 MPixel/s +19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40868 MPixel/s +18%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (20960 - 48269, n=26)
36777 MPixel/s +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=224, last 2 years)
36727 MPixel/s +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
35065 MPixel/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34573 MPixel/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34312 MPixel/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
26692 MPixel/s -23%

Wydajność systemu

System działa płynnie i niezawodnie oraz zapewnia wystarczającą moc dla wymagających obszarów zastosowań, takich jak renderowanie, edycja wideo i gry. Transfery pamięci RAM są na normalnym poziomie dla pamięci DDR5-4800, a dopełnieniem tego są dobre wyniki PC-Mark.

Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dual-channel.
Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dual-channel.
PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7871 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7087 - 8072, n=6)
7712 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7706 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7695 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7580 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7336 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7322 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6126 Points -16%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10936 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10266 - 11663, n=6)
10807 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10764 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)
10718 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10708 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10328 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10249 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9544 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10352 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10187 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9402 - 10742, n=6)
10153 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10024 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)
9716 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9581 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9549 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8571 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
12104 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11881 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)
11450 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10009 - 12541, n=6)
11364 Points +10%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11099 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10888 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10350 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7627 Points -26%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1947 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1884 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=169, last 2 years)
1878 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1664 - 2044, n=6)
1871 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1730 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1656 Points -4%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1887 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1797 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=169, last 2 years)
1788 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1591 - 1968, n=6)
1784 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1641 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1640 Points 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=169, last 2 years)
2043 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2004 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1797 - 2148, n=6)
2004 Points +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1983 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1883 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1692 Points -10%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2022 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1803 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1514 - 2069, n=6)
1759 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=169, last 2 years)
1700 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1600 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1573 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5101 pkt.
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5789 pkt.
PCMark 10 Score
7336 pkt.
Pomoc
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63157 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63110 MB/s +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62522 MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=223, last 2 years)
59304 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34438 - 74264, n=25)
59157 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55639 MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
50524 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48120 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
67051 MB/s +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66496 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65933 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=223, last 2 years)
63199 MB/s +3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36365 - 74642, n=25)
61866 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61461 MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57551 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48849 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66275 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66074 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64272 MB/s +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=223, last 2 years)
61605 MB/s +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (32276 - 67858, n=25)
59295 MB/s +2%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58294 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58073 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46056 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.4 ns *
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.1 ns * +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
94 ns * +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.1 ns * +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88 ns * +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=220, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (88 - 118.1, n=24)
85.8 ns * +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienia DPC

Standardowy test monitora latencji (surfowanie po internecie, odtwarzanie wideo 4k, wysokie obciążenie Prime95) wykazał anomalie. System nie wydaje się być odpowiedni do edycji wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą jednak doprowadzić do poprawy lub pogorszenia wydajności.

Monitor opóźnień
Monitor opóźnień
Monitor opóźnień
Monitor opóźnień
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3261 μs * -249%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1364 μs * -46%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1109.7 μs * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
945.7 μs * -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
933.2 μs *
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
717.4 μs * +23%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Pamięć masowa

Blade ma miejsce na dwa dyski SSD PCIe-4 w formacie M.2 2280. Zainstalowany dysk SSD PCIe-4 (1 TB) od Samsunga zapewnia bardzo dobre transfery. Spadki wydajności spowodowane throttlingiem termicznym nie występowały.

Blade posiada miejsce na dwa dyski SSD.
Blade posiada miejsce na dwa dyski SSD.
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7098 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2442 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 643.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3732 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2413 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.2 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
91.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
83.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
78.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
75.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
75.7 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
72.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
71.1 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
70.8 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4199 (4194.93min - 4199.13max) MB/s +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4119 (4098.66min - 4118.81max) MB/s +16%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4117 (3552.16min - 4116.81max) MB/s +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3928 (3889.8min - 3927.66max) MB/s +10%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=82)
3780 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3764 (3540.2min - 3763.76max) MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3564 (3515.46min - 3563.69max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=198, last 2 years)
3539 MB/s -1%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4767 (4365.51min - 4766.62max) MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4299 (4288.86min - 4298.95max) MB/s +22%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4236 (3477.46min - 4236.46max) MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4167 (4120.63min - 4166.62max) MB/s +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4033 (3953.13min - 4032.82max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=198, last 2 years)
3830 MB/s +8%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=82)
3590 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3531 (3391.93min - 3530.77max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7020 (5888.98min - 7020.02max) MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6921 (6631.14min - 6921.02max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6867 (6210.3min - 6866.91max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6847 (6590.72min - 6846.78max) MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6663 (6017.91min - 6663.07max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6550 (5497.59min - 6549.73max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=82)
6471 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=198, last 2 years)
6388 MB/s -4%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5412 (5265.32min - 5411.99max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4999 (4982.73min - 4998.98max) MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4980 (4904.66min - 4979.58max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4876 (4374.87min - 4876.3max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=198, last 2 years)
4818 MB/s -3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=82)
4809 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4740 (4542.15min - 4740.19max) MB/s -5%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4421 (4173.33min - 4420.8max) MB/s -11%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.2 (79.58min - 81.23max) MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
80.6 (67.84min - 80.61max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.6 (78.85min - 79.63max) MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.9 (77.66min - 77.9max) MB/s -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
77.1 (76.91min - 77.11max) MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=82)
77 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
74.3 (71.59min - 74.33max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=198, last 2 years)
67.9 MB/s -16%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
333 (331.94min - 333.25max) MB/s +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
264 (263.57min - 264.44max) MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
256 (23.49min - 256.28max) MB/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
239 (238.19min - 238.82max) MB/s +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=198, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
212 (209.62min - 211.78max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
205 (195.73min - 204.56max) MB/s -3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=82)
188.1 MB/s -11%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4309 (4179.96min - 4309.38max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4152 (4133.05min - 4152.1max) MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3566 (3562.85min - 3566.11max) MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3184 (3180.75min - 3183.86max) MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2855 (2482.75min - 2854.87max) MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=198, last 2 years)
2580 MB/s -38%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=82)
2567 MB/s -38%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1528 (1477.56min - 1527.59max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3600 (3594.9min - 3599.81max) MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3512 (3421.77min - 3511.78max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3435 (2876.62min - 3435.27max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2694 (2561.51min - 2693.92max) MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=198, last 2 years)
2146 MB/s -39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2141 (2137.08min - 2141.26max) MB/s -39%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=82)
1938 MB/s -45%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
585 (555.77min - 584.61max) MB/s -83%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9117 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8376 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7659 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7180 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6864 Points -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=82)
6848 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)
6827 Points -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5985 Points -17%
Score Read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3576 Points +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3431 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3123 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2858 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2562 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)
2499 Points -13%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=82)
2415 Points -16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1994 Points -30%
Score Write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3814 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3723 Points +28%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=82)
3269 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)
3118 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3093 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2953 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2916 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2563 Points -12%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5750 MB/s +24%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5592.23 MB/s +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5396.69 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5171.96 MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)
4960 MB/s +7%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=82)
4909 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4623.95 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3388 MB/s -27%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4240 MB/s +19%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4073 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3881.37 MB/s +9%