Notebookcheck Logo

Recenzja HP Omen 17 (2023): Gamingowy laptop wykorzystuje RTX 4080

Gracz z wyższej półki. Procesor Core i9-13900HX i GeForce RTX 4080 zapewniają wystarczającą wydajność do obróbki wideo, renderowania i gier w rozdzielczości QHD. Klawiatura laptopa oferuje także indywidualne podświetlenie klawiszy, sześć klawiszy makro oraz sporo miejsca na klawisze strzałek.
Gaming Geforce Intel Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

Model 2023 Omen 17, czyli high-endowy laptop do gier, wykorzystuje tę samą obudowę, którą znamy już z poprzednika, ale zawiera aktualny sprzęt: Laptop jest napędzany przez układy Raptor Lake i Ada Lovelace. HP łączy Core i9 z GPU RTX 4080, żądając za cały pakiet prawie 3300 euro (3 582 dolary). Wśród konkurentów są takie laptopy jak np Alienware m17 R5, a także.Razer Blade 16 (początek 2023 roku), theAsus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ, oraz Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H.

Informacje na temat obudowy, wyposażenia, urządzeń wejściowych i głośników znajdziecie w naszej recenzji poprzedniego modelu, który pod tymi względami jest identyczny.

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Procesor
Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Karta grafiki
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU - 12 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 2010 MHz, pamięć: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3118, Optimus
Pamięć
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Matryca
17.30 cali 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pikseli 170 PPI, BOE BOE09BF, IPS, refleksująca: nie, 165 Hz
Chipset
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Dysk twardy
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, 1024 GB 
, 893 GB wolne miejsce
Złącza
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, gniazda audio: combo audio port, czytnik kart: SD, SDXC, SDHC, TPM 2.0
Łączność
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Gabaryty
wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 27 x 397.1 x 262
Akumulator
83 Wh, 6880 mAh litowo-polimerowy
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
System operacyjny
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
kamerka: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Inne
głośniki: stereo, klawiatura: chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, McAfee LiveSafe (trial), Microsoft 365 (trial), Microsoft OneNote (trial), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji
Waga
2.766 kg, zasilacz: 1.154 kg
Cena
3299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiële concurrenten in vergelijking

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.4 %
03/2023
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg27 mm17.30"2560x1440
86.1 %
01/2023
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
3.4 kg26.7 mm17.00"3840x2160
91.2 %
02/2023
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.99 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.4 %
02/2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg26 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
03/2023
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg30.4 mm16.00"2560x1600

Vergelijking grootte

397.1 mm 262 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg397.3 mm 298.71 mm 26.7 mm 3.4 kg363 mm 262 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg354 mm 264 mm 30.4 mm 2.4 kg355 mm 244 mm 21.99 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Po lewej: zasilanie, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), Mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), combo audio, czytnik kart pamięci (SD)
Po lewej: zasilanie, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), Mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), combo audio, czytnik kart pamięci (SD)
Po prawej: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
Po prawej: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
125 MB/s +74%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=103, last 2 years)
99 MB/s +38%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
72 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
207.6 MB/s +144%
Average of class Gaming
  (26 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
122.9 MB/s +45%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
85 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1579 (848min - 1696max) MBit/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1545 (1189min - 1625max) MBit/s +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1467 (733min - 1546max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1780, n=154, last 2 years)
1280 MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=176)
1249 MBit/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1155 (495min - 1441max) MBit/s -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
MediaTek MT7921
981 MBit/s -33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1627 (1381min - 1714max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1619 (1537min - 1665max) MBit/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1557 (795min - 1691max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=160, last 2 years)
1414 MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=176)
1395 MBit/s -14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1328 (1093min - 1448max) MBit/s -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
MediaTek MT7921
968 MBit/s -41%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1443 (733-1546)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø976 (930-1012)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1155 (495-1441)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1551 (848-1696)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1545 (1189-1625)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1626 (1381-1714)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø968 (947-983)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1327 (1093-1448)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1537-1665)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1530 (795-1691)
ColorChecker
9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen 17-ck2097ng: 10.63 ∆E min: 2.95 - max: 20.42 ∆E

Wyświetlacz - QHD z uwzględnieniem pokrycia sRGB

Siatka subpikselowa
Siatka subpikselowa

Podczas gdy w tym momencie wielu konkurentów woli stosować wyświetlacze o proporcjach 16:10, HP pozostaje w Omenie wierny formatowi 16:9. Pozytywną cechą jest to, że responsywny panel 165-Hz nie wykazuje migotania PWM na żadnym poziomie jasności.

Jasność i kontrast matowego 17,3-calowego wyświetlacza (2 560 x 1 440 pikseli) spełniają wymagania (> 300 cd/m² i 1 000:1). Wyświetlacz Omena oferuje jednak najniższą jasność wśród wyświetlaczy naszych konkurentów. Na stronie Legion 7 Pro ma tutaj najjaśniejszy panel.

337
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
podświetlenie ekranu
BOE BOE09BF tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
maksimum: 371 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 349.9 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 90 %
na akumulatorze: 371 cd/m²
kontrast: 1159:1 (czerń: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.01
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
BOE BOE09BF, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.00
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
24%
26%
2%
23%
-11%
Display P3 Coverage
67.4
97.2
44%
98.5
46%
69.1
3%
97
44%
59.03
-12%
sRGB Coverage
97.6
99.6
2%
100
2%
99.7
2%
99.9
2%
87.46
-10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.6
88.4
27%
89.7
29%
71.2
2%
84.9
22%
61.04
-12%
Response Times
-18%
12%
28%
47%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3)
16.4 ?(7.8, 8.6)
-5%
6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)
58%
12.3 ?(5.7, 6.6)
21%
5.1 ?(2.3, 2.8)
67%
14 ?(7, 7)
10%
Response Time Black / White *
8.9 ?(3.7, 5.2)
11.6 ?(6.2, 5.4)
-30%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-35%
5.9 ?(2.2, 3.7)
34%
6.6 ?(2.2, 4.2)
26%
10 ?(6, 4)
-12%
PWM Frequency
100 ?(50)
Screen
-88%
-12%
25%
3%
-15%
Brightness middle
371
484
30%
456.8
23%
511
38%
470
27%
321
-13%
Brightness
350
449
28%
437
25%
469
34%
459
31%
302
-14%
Brightness Distribution
90
87
-3%
83
-8%
86
-4%
93
3%
84
-7%
Black Level *
0.32
0.55
-72%
0.35
-9%
0.4
-25%
0.42
-31%
0.41
-28%
Contrast
1159
880
-24%
1305
13%
1278
10%
1119
-3%
783
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.74
4.8
-176%
3.7
-113%
0.95
45%
1.86
-7%
1.62
7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.59
7.48
-108%
6.42
-79%
2.07
42%
3.87
-8%
4.08
-14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.01
4.74
-369%
0.66
35%
0.91
10%
0.93
8%
1.93
-91%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
5.5
-96%
2.6
7%
0.6
79%
2.7
4%
1.24
56%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.42 91%
2.3 96%
2.176 101%
2.246 98%
2.41 91%
CCT
6474 100%
6148 106%
6108 106%
6545 99%
6711 97%
6261 104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-27% / -54%
9% / -0%
18% / 21%
24% / 13%
-9% / -12%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

W stanie dostawy odwzorowanie kolorów jest już bardzo dobre, a można je dodatkowo poprawić kalibracją, która powoduje spadek odchylenia kolorów z 1,74 do 1 (wartość docelowa < 3). Ponadto równiej odwzorowywana jest wtedy także skala szarości.

Wyświetlacz jest w stanie pokryć przestrzeń barwną sRGB prawie w całości, ale już nie przestrzenie barw AdobeRGB i DCI-P3. Wyświetlacze większości konkurentów wypadają tu lepiej, przy czym tylko panel ozn Legionranging na tym samym poziomie.

CalMAN: Skala szarości
CalMAN: Skala szarości
CalMAN: Nasycenie
CalMAN: Nasycenie
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Skala szarości (skalibrowana)
CalMAN: Skala szarości (skalibrowana)
CalMAN: nasycenie (skalibrowane)
CalMAN: nasycenie (skalibrowane)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrowany)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrowany)
HP Omen 17 vs sRGB
HP Omen 17 vs sRGB
HP Omen 17 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen 17 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen 17 vs P3
HP Omen 17 vs P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.7 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.3 ms rise
↘ 8.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18034 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Kąty widzenia panelu IPS są stabilne, więc można go odczytywać pod każdym kątem widzenia. Wyświetlacz może być odczytywany na zewnątrz, o ile nie ma bezpośredniego światła słonecznego.

The Omen 17 na zewnątrz
The Omen 17 na zewnątrz
Kąty widzenia
Kąty widzenia

Wydajność - laptop HP oferuje wydajny sprzęt

Wraz z Omenem 17 Hewlett Packard oferuje 17,3-calowy laptop, który jest skierowany do gier w rozdzielczości QHD, ale dobrze radzi sobie także w innych obszarach zastosowań wymagających dużej wydajności. Niezbędną wydajność obliczeniową zapewniają układy Raptor Lake i Ada Lovelace. Testowany przez nas egzemplarz Omena jest dostępny w cenie około 3300 euro (~3 582 dolarów).

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
Nvidia Systeminfo

Warunki badania

Preinstalowane oprogramowanie Omen Gaming Hub stanowi centrum sterowania laptopem. Oprócz wyboru trybu zasilania (patrz tabela) pozwala ono także na podkręcenie napięcia w procesorze i skonfigurowanie indywidualnej krzywej wentylatora. Ponieważ tryb "Performance" stwarzał w naszym egzemplarzu testowym pewne problemy (dziwne zacinanie się i spadki wydajności), korzystaliśmy głównie z trybu zasilania "Balanced" wraz z automatyczną kontrolą wentylatorów. Optimus został aktywowany.

Wydajność Zrównoważony Eco
Limit mocy 1 100 Watt 55 Watt 55 Watt
Power Limit 2 130 Watt 130 Watt 130 Watt
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub

Procesor

Na stronie .Core i9-13900HXprocesor (Raptor Lake) składa się z szesnastu rdzeni Efficiency (bez hyperthreadingu, od 1,6 do 3,9 GHz) i ośmiu rdzeni Performance (hyperthreading, od 2,2 do 5,4 GHz), co daje łącznie 32 logiczne rdzenie CPU.

Podczas pracy w sieci procesor przechodzi testy CPU benchmarku Cinebench R15 ze średnimi i wysokimi (wielowątkowymi) oraz wysokimi i maksymalnymi (jednowątkowymi) wartościami taktowania. O ile podczas pracy na akumulatorze wydajność jednowątkowa (254 pkt.) spada nieznacznie, o tyle spadek wydajności wielowątkowej jest znaczny (1 303 pkt.).

Wyniki benchmarków oscylują na poziomie (jednowątkowo) średniej dla procesora lub poniżej (wielowątkowo). Ogólnie rzecz biorąc, tryb "Performance" daje tylko niewielką przewagę wydajności, przy czym najwięcej zyskują benchmarki AIDA. Z drugiej strony spowoduje on również, że prędkość procesora pozostanie na wysokim poziomie przy stałym obciążeniu wielowątkowym, co pokazuje test pętli CB15.

Wielowątkowość (praca w sieci)
Wielowątkowość (praca w sieci)
Jednowątkowy (praca w sieci)
Jednowątkowy (praca w sieci)

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

0230460690920115013801610184020702300253027602990322034503680391041404370Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø2810 (2649.18-4311.13)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2287 (2247.19-2314.81)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX: Ø2740 (2605.18-3101.02)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø2434 (2349.9-2579.98)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø1944 (1886.88-2518.1)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX; Leistung: Ø4174 (4028.2-4381.06)
Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy pętli CB15 (Balanced)
Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy pętli CB15 (Balanced)
Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy pętli CB15 (Performance)
Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy pętli CB15 (Performance)
Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy w pętli CB15 (Eco)
Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy w pętli CB15 (Eco)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
84.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
83 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
81.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
80.5 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
77.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
75.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
59.7 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
48.4 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
30162 Points +14%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30139 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (24270 - 32623, n=22)
28225 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
27299 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
26736 (22394.1min - 26736.1max) Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26407 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=236, last 2 years)
19189 Points -27%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
13872 Points -47%
Single Core
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2126 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2095 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
2077 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1867 - 2105, n=19)
2044 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2043 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2029 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=234, last 2 years)
1804 Points -14%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1554 Points -26%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
11510 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11500 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (9152 - 12541, n=20)
10766 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
10537 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
10118 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
8697 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=234, last 2 years)
7288 Points -28%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5306 Points -48%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
818 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
805 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
796 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
788 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (722 - 810, n=20)
784 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
742 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=234, last 2 years)
695 Points -14%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
612 Points -24%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4819 (4429.68min - 4819.28max) Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX (turbo)
4764 (4425.76min - 4764.17max) Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4731 (1123.72min - 4730.93max) Points +10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4529 (4463.29min - 4528.99max) Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (3913 - 4970, n=21)
4522 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
4381 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4311 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=239, last 2 years)
3034 Points -30%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2315 (2247.19min - 2314.81max) Points -46%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
306 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX (turbo)
296 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
301 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
301 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
300 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (247 - 304, n=21)
292 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
274 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=238, last 2 years)
266 Points -12%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
250 Points -17%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
221 Seconds * -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=232, last 2 years)
203 Seconds * -33%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
153 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (101 - 153, n=21)
117.9 Seconds * +23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
114 Seconds * +25%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
114 Seconds * +25%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
106 Seconds * +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105 Seconds * +31%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
122254 MIPS +29%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
114658 MIPS +21%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
112526 MIPS +19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (90675 - 127283, n=20)
111796 MIPS +18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
109330 MIPS +16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
94649 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=233, last 2 years)
75714 MIPS -20%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
61988 MIPS -35%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
7035 MIPS +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6925 MIPS
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
6909 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (6340 - 7177, n=20)
6848 MIPS -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
6811 MIPS -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
6445 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=233, last 2 years)
6079 MIPS -12%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5734 MIPS -17%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
21058 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
20245 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (17614 - 21075, n=21)
19809 Points -2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
19801 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
19433 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
18152 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=238, last 2 years)
13370 Points -34%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10021 Points -51%
Single-Core
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
2084 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2079 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2044 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2025 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1345 - 2093, n=21)
1988 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
1805 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=238, last 2 years)
1799 Points -13%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1575 Points -24%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
31.9 fps +27%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
30.1 fps +19%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
29.7 fps +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)
29.1 fps +15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
28.7 fps +14%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
25.2 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=236, last 2 years)
20.9 fps -17%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
16.8 fps -33%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
57.3 s * -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=230, last 2 years)
49 s * -11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
47.7 s * -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
47.5 s * -7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44.2 s *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44 s * -0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)
42.5 s * +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
41.7 s * +6%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.486 sec * -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=233, last 2 years)
0.4711 sec * -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.4121 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)
0.402 sec * -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.3979 sec * -3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
0.3959 sec * -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
0.387 sec * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.3862 sec *

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4311 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
275 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
301 Points
Pomoc
Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
97.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
95.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
91.4 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
88.8 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
72.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.6 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
62.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
27227 KRay/s +55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
26741 KRay/s +52%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
25857 KRay/s +47%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (17589 - 27615, n=21)
24097 KRay/s +37%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
23990 KRay/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=229, last 2 years)
17966 KRay/s +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
17589 KRay/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
16202 KRay/s -8%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
133668 Points +51%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
131131 Points +48%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
125944 Points +42%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (88686 - 137015, n=21)
120602 Points +36%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
118518 Points +34%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
104841 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=229, last 2 years)
90126 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
88686 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
6750 MB/s +55%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
6596 MB/s +51%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
6350 MB/s +46%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (4362 - 7029, n=21)
6061 MB/s +39%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
5888 MB/s +35%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
4362 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=229, last 2 years)
4218 MB/s -3%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
3457 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
143409 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
134514 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
134227 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (125644 - 141385, n=21)
133924 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
133226 Points -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
125644 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=229, last 2 years)
108079 Points -20%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
105169 Points -22%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
17026 Points +38%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
15813 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
15807 Points +28%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
14959 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (12334 - 17179, n=21)
14889 Points +21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
12918 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
12334 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=229, last 2 years)
11990 Points -3%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
66753 Points +52%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
66336 Points +51%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
63308 Points +44%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (43850 - 69202, n=21)
59821 Points +36%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
59656 Points +36%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
57695 Points +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=229, last 2 years)
46373 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
43850 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (89413 - 237881, n=21)
139015 MB/s +55%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
128070 MB/s +43%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
127698 MB/s +43%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
125644 MB/s +41%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
114553 MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=229, last 2 years)
105435 MB/s +18%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
89413 MB/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
54897 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
1936 MB/s +51%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
1912 MB/s +49%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
1850 MB/s +44%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1284 - 1958, n=21)
1755 MB/s +37%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
1747 MB/s +36%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
1284 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=229, last 2 years)
1189 MB/s -7%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
854 MB/s -33%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
14722 KRay/s +55%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
14671 KRay/s +55%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
13844 KRay/s +46%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (9481 - 15279, n=21)
13066 KRay/s +38%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
12871 KRay/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=229, last 2 years)
9750 KRay/s +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
9481 KRay/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
8777 KRay/s -7%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
50834 MPixel/s +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
50563 MPixel/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
50544 MPixel/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
48626 MPixel/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (42994 - 51994, n=21)
48439 MPixel/s -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
37069 MPixel/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (11451 - 60161, n=230, last 2 years)
36455 MPixel/s -28%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
30343 MPixel/s -40%

Wydajność systemu

Płynnie działający system oferuje wystarczającą wydajność obliczeniową dla wymagających dużej mocy obliczeniowej obszarów zastosowań, takich jak rendering i gry. Prędkości transferu pamięci roboczej oscylują na normalnym poziomie dla pamięci DDR5-5600. Towarzyszą im dobre wyniki w programie PC-Mark.

Pamięć robocza działa w trybie dwukanałowym.
Pamięć robocza działa w trybie dwukanałowym.
PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (7609 - 8549, n=3)
7996 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7888 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7830 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
7609 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=202, last 2 years)
7572 Points 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7292 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7223 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
12031 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
11824 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11703 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (10982 - 11824, n=3)
11503 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11078 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=201, last 2 years)
10700 Points -10%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10250 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10788 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (9976 - 10788, n=3)
10417 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
9976 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=201, last 2 years)
9729 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9090 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
8271 Points -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7686 Points -23%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
14535 Points +43%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (10135 - 14720, n=3)
11725 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=201, last 2 years)
11406 Points +13%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11296 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
11058 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10319 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10135 Points
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2182 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1991 - 2194, n=2)
2093 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1991 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1338 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)
1873 Points -6%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1597 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1592 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2044 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1828 - 2059, n=2)
1944 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1828 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1331 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)
1785 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1565 Points -14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1509 Points -17%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2400 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (2239 - 2411, n=2)
2325 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2239 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1330 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)
2035 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1780 Points -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1738 Points -22%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1990 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1808 - 1998, n=2)
1903 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1808 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1060 - 2327, n=170, last 2 years)
1702 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1342 Points -26%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1315 Points -27%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5074 pkt.
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6244 pkt.
PCMark 10 Score
7609 pkt.
Pomoc
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77973 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77544 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77060 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (67716 - 78835, n=21)
75033 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
62189 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (23850 - 92565, n=229, last 2 years)
58833 MB/s -25%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
53008 MB/s -32%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
50334 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
86248 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85073 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84869 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (73998 - 88462, n=21)
82199 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
72658 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=229, last 2 years)
62636 MB/s -27%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59935 MB/s -31%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
50996 MB/s -41%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
80441 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
76988 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (65472 - 77045, n=21)
73168 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
70939 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=229, last 2 years)
61226 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
59912 MB/s -22%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58827 MB/s -24%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
55214 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100.8 ns * -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.5 ns * -17%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
94.6 ns * -12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
87.5 ns * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)
86.3 ns * -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=226, last 2 years)
85.6 ns * -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84.7 ns *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
83.2 ns * +2%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienia DPC

Standardowy test Latency Monitor (przeglądanie stron internetowych, odtwarzanie wideo 4k, wysokie obciążenie Prime95) ujawnia pewne rzucające się w oczy zachowanie. System nie wydaje się być przystosowany do przetwarzania wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą przynieść pewne usprawnienia lub jeszcze bardziej pogorszyć sytuację.

Monitor opóźnień
Monitor opóźnień
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2505 μs * -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2448.6 μs * -16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2103 μs *
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1366.3 μs * +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
437.7 μs * +79%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Rozwiązanie w zakresie przechowywania

Omen oferuje miejsce dla dwóch dysków SSD PCIe 4 w formacie M.2-2280. Zastosowany tutaj dysk SSD PCIe 4 (1 TB) firmy SK Hynix zapewnia bardzo dobre transfery. W późniejszych częściach pętli DiskSpd obserwujemy jednak sporadyczne spadki wydajności, prawdopodobnie spowodowane throttlingiem termicznym.

Dysk SSD PCIe 4 służy jako dysk systemowy.
Dysk SSD PCIe 4 służy jako dysk systemowy.
Jest też miejsce na drugi dysk SSD.
Jest też miejsce na drugi dysk SSD.
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7152 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6095 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 752.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 461.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 5626 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 5120 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 74.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 286.5 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
92.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
85.1 pt
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
 
71 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.2 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
64.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
61.1 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
51.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4525 (4498.41min - 4525.41max) MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4093 (4067.17min - 4092.59max) MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3650 (3626.52min - 3649.67max) MB/s -5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3848 (3815.64min - 3848.21max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3844 (3257.93min - 3843.87max) MB/s 0%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2511 - 5665, n=16)
3732 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1291 - 7045, n=201, last 2 years)
3524 MB/s -8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3428 (3412.07min - 3428.49max) MB/s -11%
seq write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5145 (5060.48min - 5145.38max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4378 (4355.78min - 4378.43max) MB/s -15%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (1690 - 5181, n=16)
3849 MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=201, last 2 years)
3804 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3416 (3372.4min - 3415.84max) MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3366 (3313.08min - 3366.35max) MB/s -35%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3243 (3188.93min - 3243.04max) MB/s -37%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3242 (1498min - 3241.78max) MB/s -37%
seq q8 t1 read
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (6508 - 7177, n=16)
6900 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6878 (6539.55min - 6877.94max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6872 (4963.33min - 6872.25max) MB/s 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6861 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6682 (5778.28min - 6681.95max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1983 - 16089, n=201, last 2 years)
6331 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5023 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5017 (4534.25min - 5017.23max) MB/s -27%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6110 (6082.58min - 6110.11max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2382 - 6149, n=16)
5647 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943 (4923.06min - 4943.2max) MB/s -19%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4831 (4610.18min - 4830.79max) MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=201, last 2 years)
4764 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4244 (427.59min - 4244.22max) MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3429 (3365.09min - 3429.47max) MB/s -44%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3387 (3363.41min - 3386.9max) MB/s -45%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
95.3 (93.25min - 95.25max) MB/s +19%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
80 (78.03min - 80.03max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (54.3 - 85, n=16)
69.5 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=201, last 2 years)
68.2 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
62.5 (61.85min - 62.46max) MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
61.5 (60.59min - 61.49max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
56.5 (49.8min - 56.49max) MB/s -29%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
52.5 (50.71min - 52.46max) MB/s -34%
4k q1 t1 write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
289 (284.65min - 288.96max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
255 (243.79min - 255.25max) MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
239 (230.87min - 239.2max) MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
236 (223.33min - 235.64max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=201, last 2 years)
226 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
220 (56.84min - 219.56max) MB/s -24%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (77.7 - 335, n=16)
200 MB/s -31%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
126.7 (123.88min - 126.69max) MB/s -56%
4k q32 t16 read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5829 (5404.65min - 5828.67max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4100 (4085.58min - 4100.1max) MB/s -30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3111 (2388.54min - 3111.42max) MB/s -47%
Average of class Gaming
  (313 - 6172, n=201, last 2 years)
2576 MB/s -56%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (353 - 5829, n=16)
2259 MB/s -61%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1533 (1526.72min - 1532.76max) MB/s -74%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1527 (1525.66min - 1526.54max) MB/s -74%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
843 (833.55min - 843.1max) MB/s -86%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3537 (3519.01min - 3536.66max) MB/s +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3208 (2280.32min - 3207.74max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2783 (2698.54min - 2783.41max) MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2689 (2088.87min - 2688.7max) MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=201, last 2 years)
2166 MB/s -32%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (148.5 - 3719, n=16)
1318 MB/s -59%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1282 (960.6min - 1281.78max) MB/s -60%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
288 (123min - 287.76max) MB/s -91%
AS SSD
Score Total
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10330 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8224 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7311 Points -29%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (4390 - 10562, n=15)
7122 Points -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (1923 - 13854, n=189, last 2 years)
6808 Points -34%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5610 Points -46%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4008 Points -61%
Score Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3448 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3308 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3188 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (528 - 4721, n=189, last 2 years)
2503 Points -27%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (953 - 3793, n=15)
2109 Points -39%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1761 Points -49%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1250 Points -64%
Score Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5157 Points
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2690 - 5157, n=15)
3990 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3468 Points -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=189, last 2 years)
3092 Points -40%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3010 Points -42%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2428 Points -53%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2211 Points -57%
Seq Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5861.95 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5429.33 MB/s -7%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (3522 - 5892, n=15)
5256 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5144.76 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1759 - 12763, n=189, last 2 years)
4916 MB/s -16%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4716 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4308.28 MB/s -27%
Seq Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5242.91 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4064.76 MB/s -22%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2489 - 5880, n=15)
3971 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=189, last 2 years)
3635 MB/s -31%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3058.47 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2890.58 MB/s -45%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2671 MB/s -49%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
85.9 MB/s +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=189, last 2 years)
67.4 MB/s +6%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (56 - 79.4, n=15)
65.7 MB/s +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
63.85 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
58.78 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
49.65 MB/s -22%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
49.14 MB/s -23%
4K Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
251.87 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
220.74 MB/s -12%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (144.4 - 286, n=15)
219 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=189, last 2 years)
211 MB/s -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
205.06 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
144.8 MB/s -43%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
120.14 MB/s -52%
4K-64 Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2798.41 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2744.3 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2558.72 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 3475, n=189, last 2 years)
1938 MB/s -31%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (359 - 3131, n=15)
1518 MB/s -46%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1271.5 MB/s -55%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
728.79 MB/s -74%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4380.62 MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2206 - 4381, n=15)
3374 MB/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2856.24 MB/s -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=189, last 2 years)
2520 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2499.95 MB/s -43%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1944.47 MB/s -56%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1824.12 MB/s -58%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.087 ms * -112%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.02 - 0.379, n=187, last 2 years)
0.05338 ms * -30%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.041 ms *
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (0.03 - 0.062, n=15)
0.03867 ms * +6%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.031 ms * +24%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.028 ms * +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.025 ms * +39%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.082 ms * -356%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=189, last 2 years)
0.04898 ms * -172%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (0.017 - 0.069, n=15)
0.03433 ms * -91%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.032 ms * -78%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.019 ms * -6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.018 ms *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.017 ms * +6%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6777 (3480.47-7122.14)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø4118 (1511-6910.52)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6412 (5645.36-6872.58)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5697 (3283.58-6647.05)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00: Ø5002 (4613.53-5017.26)

Karta graficzna

Z.GeForce RTX 4080gPU do laptopa, HP wykorzystuje aktualny numer dwa w portfolio mobilnych GPU Nvidii. Ma on 7 424 shadery, 192-bitową magistralę i może korzystać z szybkich pamięci GDDR6 (12 288 MB). RTX 4080 jest skonfigurowany z TGP o mocy 175 W (150 W + 25 W Dynamic Boost), co jest maksymalną konfiguracją według Nvidii. Według naszego testu The Witcher 3 TGP nie jest w pełni wykorzystywany.

Wyniki benchmarku oscylują poniżej średniej dla przetestowanych przez nas do tej pory kart graficznych RTX 4080. Profil "Performance" doprowadzi do sporadycznego, niewielkiego wzrostu wydajności grafiki. Tryb dGPU nie doprowadzi do dalszej poprawy. Przełączanie między dGPU a Optimusem nie wymaga restartu - wspierany jest Advanced Optimus.

Fire Strike (zasilanie sieciowe, zbalansowane)
Fire Strike (zasilanie sieciowe, zbalansowane)
Fire Strike (zasilanie bateryjne, zrównoważone)
Fire Strike (zasilanie bateryjne, zrównoważone)
Fire Strike (praca w sieci, wydajność)
Fire Strike (praca w sieci, wydajność)
Fire Strike (praca w sieci, Eco)
Fire Strike (praca w sieci, Eco)
Fire Strike (praca w sieci, wydajność, dGPU)
Fire Strike (praca w sieci, wydajność, dGPU)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
98.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
94.4 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
94.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
 
89.6 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
89.1 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
86.1 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
85.8 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
77.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
69 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
60038 Points +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
59457 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
58631 Points +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
56565 Points +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (45199 - 63128, n=20)
56426 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
55111 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)
54336 Points -1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
41942 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=238, last 2 years)
39986 Points -27%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
168293 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
164706 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
138528 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=147, last 2 years)
135603 Points +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (92134 - 167815, n=9)
135092 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)
133330 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
131984 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
129611 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
43847 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
43525 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (33058 - 45220, n=18)
40593 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
40570 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
40449 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
39852 Points -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)
38171 Points -6%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
34948 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=242, last 2 years)
29230 Points -28%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
19157 Points +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
18441 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
18417 Points +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (13282 - 19663, n=18)
17531 Points +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
16852 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)
16584 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
15982 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=240, last 2 years)
11928 Points -25%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
11912 Points -25%
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=173, last 2 years)
23.3 Seconds * -46%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
16 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (13 - 20, n=17)
15.5 Seconds * +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)
15 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
15 Seconds * +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)
14 Seconds * +12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, Leistung)
14 Seconds * +12%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=178, last 2 years)
39.7 Seconds * -80%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (21 - 28, n=18)
23.1 Seconds * -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
23 Seconds * -5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, Leistung)
23 Seconds * -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU, Leistung)
22 Seconds * -0%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)
2688 mpaths
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung)
2672 mpaths -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)
2655 mpaths -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, Leistung)
2632 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (2128 - 2843, n=14)
2600 mpaths -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=127, last 2 years)
2035 mpaths -24%
GPU CUDA
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung)
1989 mpaths 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, Leistung)
1988 mpaths 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)
1983 mpaths
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)
1945 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1647 - 2098, n=14)
1928 mpaths -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=130, last 2 years)
1468 mpaths -26%
CPU
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, Leistung)
19593 mpaths +30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)
18935 mpaths +26%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung)
17206 mpaths +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (11906 - 21823, n=14)
17026 mpaths +13%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)
15071 mpaths
Average of class Gaming
  (1690 - 26944, n=143, last 2 years)
13236 mpaths -12%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, Leistung)
940 mpaths +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )
939 mpaths +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
937 mpaths +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
926 mpaths
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Leistung)
923 mpaths 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (812 - 967, n=12)
910 mpaths -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (55 - 1334, n=190, last 2 years)
596 mpaths -36%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )
83 mpaths -91%
CPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
30622 ksamples +31%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )
30614 ksamples +31%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, Leistung)
29548 ksamples +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (19636 - 31653, n=12)
26850 ksamples +15%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Leistung)
25321 ksamples +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
23289 ksamples
Average of class Gaming
  (2741 - 37629, n=190, last 2 years)
18817 ksamples -19%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )
14626 ksamples -37%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
189320 Points +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
177979 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Leistung)
174882 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
173311 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
172437 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (146413 - 189320, n=18)
170514 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
165052 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 226512, n=237, last 2 years)
121290 Points -30%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
107088 Points -38%
Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
175235 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (153564 - 175235, n=3)
164645 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (30029 - 213472, n=44, last 2 years)
116331 Points -34%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Wydajność w grach

Omen, który jest skierowany do gier w rozdzielczości QHD na wysokich do maksymalnych ustawieniach, pozwala również na uzyskanie wyższych rozdzielczości po podłączeniu odpowiedniego monitora. Liczba klatek na sekundę w testowanych przez nas grach oscyluje poniżej średniej dla wszystkich testowanych do tej pory kart graficznych RTX 4080. Profil "Performance" prowadzi do wzrostu liczby klatek na sekundę nieco powyżej średniej. W niektórych grach tryb dGPU jest w stanie zapewnić dodatkowy wzrost.

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
98.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
97.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
96.2 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
93 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
91 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
 
90.1 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.1 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
58.2 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
178 (151min) fps +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
176.8 (159min) fps +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
175 (150min) fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU)
174.9 (128min) fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)
172.2 (121min) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (130.4 - 186.1, n=18)
167.1 fps +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
164 (128min) fps
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
126.2 fps -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=235, last 2 years)
115.4 fps -30%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
146.1 (5.24min, 100P1) fps +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
145.5 (3.79min, 100P1) fps +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
140.7 (3.02min, 100P1) fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (102.9 - 152.7, n=17)
129.8 fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)
128.1 (5.93min, 83.3P1) fps +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Leistung)
125.7 (8.63min, 83.3P1) fps +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
121.1 (13.2min, 83.3P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=224, last 2 years)
106.5 fps -12%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
92.6 (7.62min, 55.6P1) fps -24%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
168.1 fps +16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU, Leistung)
163.4 fps +12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3, Leistung)
163.1 fps +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
162.4 fps +12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
157.8 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (129 - 182.1, n=18)
157.8 fps +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
145.4 fps
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.3)
113.6 fps -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=234, last 2 years)
110 fps -24%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
338 (43.6min, 243P1) fps +22%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU, Leistung)
330 (13.4min, 237P1) fps +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
323 (61.7min, 222P1) fps +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
318 (29.2min, 228P1) fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (239 - 357, n=17)
310 fps +12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Leistung)
305 (27.1min, 203P1) fps +11%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
276 (60.5min, 196.3P1) fps
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
230 (121.4min, 165.6P1) fps -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=232, last 2 years)
204 fps -26%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
194.7 (160min) fps +25%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
180.7 (154.9min) fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
179 (152.4min) fps +15%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)
165.9 (140.7min) fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Leistung)
165.2 (142.4min) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (136.2 - 194.7, n=18)
164 fps +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
155.3 (128.4min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=245, last 2 years)
141.5 fps -9%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
94 (75.5min) fps -39%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
138.8 fps +16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
137 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
131.8 fps +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Leistung)
130.5 fps +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)
123.5 fps +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (95.3 - 139.5, n=19)
122.6 fps +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
119.4 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=250, last 2 years)
100.9 fps -15%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
43.3 fps -64%

Aby ocenić, czy liczba klatek na sekundę pozostaje w dużym stopniu stała przez dłuższy czas, uruchamiamy grę "The Witcher 3" przez około 60 minut w rozdzielczości Full-HD i maksymalnych ustawieniach jakości. W tym czasie postać gracza nie jest poruszana. Nie zauważamy żadnego spadku liczby klatek na sekundę.

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø157.5 (139-169)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT: Ø114.1 (101-125)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø118.8 (111-126)
Eurocom Nightsky TXi317 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø107.4 (100-116)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø105.5 (72.6-190.19)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø166.9 (141-179)
Pomiary GPU podczas naszego testu The Witcher 3 (Balanced, Optimus)
Pomiary GPU podczas naszego testu The Witcher 3 (Balanced, Optimus)
Pomiary GPU podczas naszego testu The Witcher 3 (Performance, dGPU)
Pomiary GPU podczas naszego testu The Witcher 3 (Performance, dGPU)
low med. high ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 183.8 183.1 175.5 121.1 116
The Witcher 3 (2015) 459.7 400.5 287.8 164
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 206 180.5 167.2 155.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 192.4 173 145.4 117.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 169 146.9 119.4
Far Cry 5 (2018) 160 132 129 126 124
Strange Brigade (2018) 388 300 290 276 208
F1 22 (2022) 255 248 231 97.5 67.6
The Callisto Protocol (2022) 167.6 153.7 148.3 111.5 83.7
Returnal (2023) 150 147 137 121 92
Atomic Heart (2023) 170.8 142.3 121.1 100.3 79.2
Company of Heroes 3 (2023) 275 244.6 206.5 205.31 153.8
Sons of the Forest (2023) 78.1 75 74.6 69.7 66.8

Emisje - laptop HP wytwarza dużo hałasu

Poziomy hałasu

W codziennej pracy (Biuro, Internet) i podczas pracy na biegu jałowym, stale pracujące wentylatory są wyraźnie słyszalne. Przy dużym obciążeniu (stress test, The Witcher 3) poziom hałasu wzrasta dalej i możliwe jest osiągnięcie poziomu 50 dB (A). Tryb "Performance" prowadzi do szybszego wzrostu poziomu hałasu aż do maksimum i utrzymania go na tym poziomie. Szum składa się z lekkiego warkotu, któremu towarzyszy stonowane gwizdanie.

BIOS Omena zawiera autorską opcję HP "Fan always on", która jest domyślnie aktywna. Dezaktywacja tej opcji nie prowadzi do żadnych zmian w naszym testowym egzemplarzu.

Hałas

luz
31 / 32 / 33 dB
obciążenie
45 / 50 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
cichy
40 dB(A)
słyszalny
50 dB(A)
irytujący
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (odległość 15 cm)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2048.539.740.939.150.52542.140.639.742.344.63147.445.550.746.156.3403428.632.328.639.45033.927.827.130.138.76335.528.228.227.839.98031.325.724.321.632.710031.22421.913.331.112529.621.920.414.531.616029.624.324.417.930.520032.224.823.719.133.425031.425.223.516.134.331530.321.720.212.833.240032.625.42210.635.550034.526.523.111.940630352422.810.53980034.723.122.710.739.2100035.523.121.910.639.9125036.823.522.510.740.4160034.621.420.511.138.8200033.920.119.211.638.3250034.321.722.211.939.3315031.720.31812.436.9400031.41514.812.735.9500030.114141335.9630027.113.613.513.434.6800023.113.113.413.130.91000019.81313.112.927.21250015.412.612.712.421.616000131211.811.816.3SPL45.233.13224.449.7N5.11.81.60.67.2median 31.4median 21.7median 20.5median 12.4median 35.5Delta4.34.84.11.44.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen 17-ck2097ng
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise
11%
12%
-2%
2%
-2%
off / environment *
24
23
4%
23
4%
24
-0%
25
-4%
25.4
-6%
Idle Minimum *
31
23
26%
23
26%
26
16%
26
16%
28
10%
Idle Average *
32
28.11
12%
23
28%
28
12%
28
12%
28
12%
Idle Maximum *
33
28.11
15%
23.6
28%
34
-3%
30
9%
31.2
5%
Load Average *
45
30.62
32%
39
13%
47
-4%
48
-7%
52.2
-16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45
49.75
-11%
51.6
-15%
55
-22%
49
-9%
52.2
-16%
Load Maximum *
50
50.17
-0%
51.3
-3%
56
-12%
52
-4%
52.2
-4%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Temperatury

W codziennej pracy (Office, Internet) temperatury obudowy utrzymują się w zielonym zakresie. Pod obciążeniem (stress test, The Witcher 3) laptop nagrzewa się zauważalnie, ale pozostaje to w granicach - przynajmniej u góry. Temperatury procesora nie dają powodów do obaw.

 34 °C38 °C37 °C 
 38 °C41 °C39 °C 
 34 °C34 °C35 °C 
maks. w ogóle: 41 °C
średnia: 36.7 °C
46 °C51 °C43 °C
45 °C45 °C39 °C
35 °C35 °C30 °C
maks. w ogóle: 51 °C
średnia: 41 °C
zasilacz  36 °C | temperatura otoczenia 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-20%
-8%
-28%
-23%
-16%
Maximum Upper Side *
41
53
-29%
40
2%
48
-17%
54
-32%
31.3
24%
Maximum Bottom *
51
56
-10%
37.6
26%
49
4%
55
-8%
43.3
15%
Idle Upper Side *
24
30
-25%
32.4
-35%
40
-67%
29
-21%
31.3
-30%
Idle Bottom *
25
29
-16%
31.4
-26%
33
-32%
33
-32%
43.3
-73%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Stress Test

Nasz test obciążeniowy z ciągle działającymi programami Prime95 i Furmark reprezentuje ekstremalny scenariusz, który wykorzystujemy do oceny stabilności systemu pod pełnym obciążeniem. CPU (P: 3,8 GHz, E: 3,2 GHz) i GPU (2 do 2,1 GHz) rozpoczynają test z wysokim taktowaniem. Po krótkim czasie prędkość CPU spada do około 1,8 GHz (rdzenie P) i 2 GHz (rdzenie E), a prędkość GPU wzrasta w tym samym czasie do 2,3 - 2,4 GHz.

Test na stres
Test na stres
Test na stres
Test na stres
Test na stres
Test na stres
Na stronie Witcher 3
Na stronie Witcher 3
Na stronie Witcher 3
Na stronie Witcher 3
Na stronie Witcher 3
Na stronie Witcher 3

Mówcy

Głośniki stereo wytwarzają przyzwoity dźwięk, ale prawie nie ma on basów.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.143.42542.3443146.1484028.633.75030.132.26327.832.78021.626.810013.323.112514.527.816017.943.120019.156.125016.164.631512.86240010.663.950011.965.563010.567.180010.765.9100010.668.8125010.768.2160011.167.4200011.669.3250011.967.1315012.469.5400012.768.950001369630013.466.6800013.169.61000012.973.31250012.471.11600011.864SPL24.480.6N0.651.5median 12.4median 67.1Delta1.45.929.232.329.829.621.824.325.427.128.726.327.230.818.641.419.148.719.552.517.352.618.456.117.151.515.553.112.656.610.858.612.362.81162.410.959.81060.510.260.610.559.411.162.611.666.711.858.91257.812.259.712.561.412.451.212.241.211.735.623.973.30.533.1median 12.2median 58.62.14.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 17-ck2097ngAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Zarządzanie energią - laptop gamingowy z zasilaczem o mocy 330 W

Pobór mocy

Pobór mocy waha się na normalnym poziomie dla zastosowanego sprzętu. Podczas naszego testu The Witcher 3 pobór mocy utrzymuje się na stałym poziomie, a podczas stress testu po kilku minutach zużycie spada - procesor jest dławiony. Dołączony do zestawu zasilacz (330 W) jest wystarczająco pojemny.

Pobór mocy
wyłączony / stan wstrzymaniadarklight 0.1 /  W
luzdarkmidlight 16 / 20 / 26 W
obciążenie midlight 135 / 299 W
 color bar
Legenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
18%
-16%
-13%
5%
13%
-6%
10%
Idle Minimum *
16
13
19%
15.2
5%
18
-13%
10
37%
12.2
24%
16.6 ?(8 - 39, n=15)
-4%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=184, last 2 years)
14%
Idle Average *
20
16.5
17%
22.8
-14%
24
-20%
16
20%
18
10%
21.9 ?(9.5 - 44.6, n=15)
-10%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=184, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Maximum *
26
17
35%
49.8
-92%
32
-23%
27
-4%
19.4
25%
34 ?(20.5 - 68.1, n=15)
-31%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=184, last 2 years)
-3%
Load Average *
135
93
31%
121.2
10%
130
4%
129
4%
128
5%
117.7 ?(77 - 135, n=15)
13%
111.1 ?(32.1 - 202, n=184, last 2 years)
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
215
239
-11%
242
-13%
260
-21%
247
-15%
209
3%
Load Maximum *
299
251
16%
273.7
8%
320
-7%
342
-14%
266
11%
292 ?(197.2 - 360, n=15)
2%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=183, last 2 years)
16%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø215 (206-224)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø232 (197.1-285)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.6 (17.9-20.9)

Power Consumption with External Monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø106.1 (92.1-177.9)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø193.5 (190.2-205)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø198 (185.7-205)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø203 (194.4-211)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø25.8 (21.1-33.5)

Czas pracy na baterii

Czasy pracy na akumulatorze w Omenie nie są zadowalające. Nawet mocny laptop do gier musi wytrzymać dłużej w pracy Optimusa z akumulatorem o pojemności 83 Wh. Nie udało nam się do tej pory ustalić, czy jest to spowodowane problemem sprzętowym czy programowym.

Pliki dziennika podają jedną wskazówkę dotyczącą problemu: podczas testów uruchamiania przy niskim obciążeniu (WiFi, bezczynność, wideo) GPU GeForce powinno być nieaktywne i pozostawić całą pracę procesorowi iGPU. Jednak GPU GeForce często działa tutaj z maksymalną prędkością - przy obciążeniu 0%. Według GPU-Z prowadzi to do zużycia energii na poziomie nawet 45 watów.

Z tego powodu poprosiliśmy o nową jednostkę testową od HP, by to dwukrotnie sprawdzić, ale jeszcze jej nie otrzymaliśmy. Jak tylko uda nam się go zdobyć, przetestujemy to ponownie.

Pomiary GPU podczas testu WLAN
Pomiary GPU podczas testu WLAN
Wydajność akumulatora
luz
4h 9min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 111)
3h 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 40min
obciążenie
1h 26min
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 97 Wh
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 78 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Czasy pracy
31%
59%
46%
73%
79%
66%
Reader / Idle
249
533
114%
385
55%
532
114%
540 ?(57 - 1290, n=87, last 2 years)
117%
H.264
220
294
34%
391 ?(56 - 747, n=94, last 2 years)
78%
WiFi v1.3
217
290
34%
365
68%
303
40%
583
169%
371
71%
364 ?(57 - 745, n=187, last 2 years)
68%
Load
86
107
24%
81
-6%
124
44%
65
-24%
131
52%
85.5 ?(36 - 173, n=149, last 2 years)
-1%
Gaming
62
62 ?(last 2 years)

Za

+ Wyświetlacz QHD o częstotliwości 165 Hz
+ zaawansowany Optimus
+ rozszerzalna pamięć robocza
+ Dysk SSD PCIe-4 (miejsce na drugi dysk SSD)
+ indywidualne podświetlenie klawiszy
+ Thunderbolt 4 z funkcją Power Delivery
+ zaniżanie napięcia przez oprogramowanie

Przeciw

- nieco poniżej średniej wydajności dla RTX 4080
- wysoki poziom hałasu
- klekotliwa obudowa
- mizerny czas pracy na baterii

Werdykt - solidny, wysokiej klasy laptop do gier

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng, jednostka testowa dostarczona przez HP Niemcy.
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng, jednostka testowa dostarczona przez HP Niemcy.

Wraz z modelem Omen 17, HP dostarcza potężny gamingowy laptop QHD z segmentu high-end. Z jegoCore i9-13900HXi GeForce RTX 4080gPU, laptop powinien sprawdzić się także w innych zastosowaniach, takich jak przetwarzanie i renderowanie wideo. Szybki dysk SSD PCIe 4 (1 TB) zapewnia niezbędną przestrzeń dyskową i gwarantuje krótkie czasy ładowania. Jest też miejsce na drugi dysk SSD.

HP Omen 17 (2023) reprezentuje solidny laptop do gier, ale nie wykorzystuje w pełni swojego potencjału.

Procesor i rdzeń graficzny są w stanie pracować z ciągle wysokim taktowaniem. Hałas i wydzielanie ciepła są na wysokim poziomie, który jest normalny dla tej klasy laptopów. W codziennej pracy laptop wytwarza jednak zbyt dużo hałasu.

Matowy wyświetlacz 17,3 cala (QHD, IPS, 165 Hz, sRGB) pozostawia po sobie solidne wrażenie. Sprawdza się on ogólnie nieco lepiej, niż panel FHD podobnie skonstruowanego Poprzednika "Omenaale gorzej od większości konkurentów. Złącze Thunderbolt 4 oferuje pewne opcje rozbudowy (rozwiązanie dokujące, zewnętrzne GPU). Poza tym można je wykorzystać do ładowania akumulatora za pomocą ładowarki USB-C (min. 65 W, 20 V), a także wspierane jest Power Delivery.

Ze względu na możliwą wadę, nie jesteśmy w stanie w tym momencie wydać ostatecznej opinii na temat czasu pracy na baterii. Zmierzymy ponownie czas pracy na baterii, gdy tylko otrzymamy od HP egzemplarz zastępczy. Ponieważ czas pracy na akumulatorze praktycznie nie ma wpływu na ostateczną ocenę laptopa do gier, ocena zmieni się co najwyżej nieznacznie.

Jako alternatywę można przyjrzeć się m.in Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H, który jest w stanie uzyskać wyższą wydajność z tej samej kombinacji CPU/GPU. Dodatkowo punktuje jaśniejszym wyświetlaczem w formacie 16:10.

Cena i dostępność

Omen 17 (2023) jest dostępny w ofercie HP od 1499,99 dolarów. Model podobny do naszej testowanej konfiguracji z wyjątkiem posiadania procesora i7-13700 kosztowałby w USA 2 429,99 dolarów.

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng - 28/03/2023 v7
Sascha Mölck

Wykonanie
79 / 98 → 80%
Klawiatura
81%
Myszka
81%
Komunikacja
67 / 80 → 84%
Waga
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Akumulator
54 / 95 → 57%
Wyświetlacz
90%
Wydajność w grach
99%
Wydajność w programach użytkowych
85%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 87%
Hałas
69 / 90 → 77%
Głośniki
79%
Kamerka
40 / 85 → 47%
Średnio
74%
85%
Gaming - Ważona średnia

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> laptopy testy i recenzje notebooki > Laptopy > Recenzja HP Omen 17 (2023): Gamingowy laptop wykorzystuje RTX 4080
Sascha Mölck, 2023-03-31 (Update: 2023-03-31)