Notebookcheck Logo

Recenzja Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS: Laptop AMD z czasem pracy do 20 godzin

Biegacz długodystansowy. Asus wybrał sprzęt AMD - Ryzen 9 7940HS i Radeon RX 7600S - do zasilania laptopa do gier. Szybko reagujący ekran 16:10 o przekątnej 16 cali (WUXGA, 165 Hz, FreeSync) i doskonałe czasy pracy uzupełniają konfigurację.
AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook Radeon Ryzen (Zen) Windows Zen 4

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition - średniej klasy laptop do gier - opiera się na sprzęcie AMD: ARyzen-9-7940HSaPU iRadeon-RX-7600SgPU. Konkurenci to między innymiLenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8iMSI Katana 15 B12VEK, MedionMedion Erazer Defender P40i Gigabyte G5 KE.

Aby uzyskać bardziej szczegółowe informacje na temat obudowy laptopa, łączności i urządzeń wejściowych, zapoznaj się z naszą recenzją identycznie zbudowanego siostrzanego modelu A16 Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition w recenzji: Notebook AMD pod patronatem 7 .

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Procesor
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, 114 W PL2 / Short Burst, 105 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Karta grafiki
AMD Radeon RX 7600S - 8 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 2207 MHz, pamięć: 2000 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.14003.25002, MUX Switch, AMD Smart Access Graphic
Pamięć
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Matryca
16.00 cali 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pikseli 142 PPI, BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, FreeSync, refleksująca: nie, 165 Hz
Chipset
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Dysk twardy
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, 512 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 400 GB wolne miejsce
Karta dźwiękowa
Realtek ALC256
Złącza
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: Headset combined port, TPM 2.0
Łączność
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3
Gabaryty
wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 22.1 x 355 x 252
Akumulator
90 Wh, 5845 mAh litowo-polimerowy
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
System operacyjny
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
kamerka: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Inne
głośniki: Stereo, klawiatura: Chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji
Waga
2.184 kg, zasilacz: 548 g
Cena
1699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.9 %
06/2023
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
2.2 kg22.1 mm16.00"1920x1200
87.9 %
05/2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
82.9 %
03/2023
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.6 %
05/2023
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg33 mm17.30"2560x1440
81.8 %
04/2023
Gigabyte G5 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2 kg23.9 mm15.60"1920x1080

Obudowa i łączność - niewielkie zmiany w porównaniu do siostrzanego modelu

W porównaniu do siostrzanego modelua16 ma dwukolorową obudowę. Tył pokrywy i spód obudowy mają kolor piaskowy ("Sandstorm"). Opcje łączności są również nieco inne: Jeden z dwóch portów USB-C został ulepszony do standardu USB-4.

Porównanie wielkości

397 mm 264 mm 33 mm 2.9 kg363.4 mm 260.4 mm 26.8 mm 2.5 kg359 mm 259 mm 24.9 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 238 mm 23.9 mm 2 kg355 mm 252 mm 22.1 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
prawa strona USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
prawa strona USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
lewa strona: złącze zasilania, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), audio combo
lewa strona: złącze zasilania, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), audio combo
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1622 (823min - 1820max) MBit/s +109%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1529 (623min - 1608max) MBit/s +97%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1445 (1373min - 1515max) MBit/s +86%
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1780, n=129, last 2 years)
1308 MBit/s +69%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
908 (806min - 973max) MBit/s +17%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE
  (536 - 925, n=29)
803 MBit/s +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
802 (579min - 1120max) MBit/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Realtek RTL8852BE
776 (392min - 802max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1734 (1706min - 1750max) MBit/s +92%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1686 (1451min - 1716max) MBit/s +86%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1666 (840min - 1685max) MBit/s +84%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=136, last 2 years)
1413 MBit/s +56%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1223 (1136min - 1272max) MBit/s +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Realtek RTL8852BE
905 (765min - 969max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
899 (755min - 936max) MBit/s -1%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE
  (503 - 984, n=30)
847 MBit/s -6%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø763 (392-802)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø802 (579-1120)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1509 (623-1608)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1373-1515)
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1595 (823-1820)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø908 (806-973)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (765-969)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1223 (1136-1272)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (840-1685)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1733 (1706-1750)
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1685 (1451-1716)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (755-936)
ColorChecker
16.3 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS: 15.99 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.28 ∆E

Wyświetlacz - panel 16:10 z pokryciem sRGB

Subpiksele
Subpiksele

A16 jest wyposażony w ten sam panel 165 Hz, który można znaleźć w jego siostrzanym modelu siostrzanym modelu. Jego matowy 16-calowy wyświetlacz (1920 x 1200 pikseli, IPS) ma format 16:10 i zdobywa punkty dzięki obsłudze FreeSync, braku migotania PWM i szybkiej reakcji. Kontrast jest akceptowalny, ale jasność mogłaby być nieco lepsza.

292
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
podświetlenie ekranu
BOE NE160WUM-NX2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
maksimum: 303 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 94 %
na akumulatorze: 301 cd/m²
kontrast: 1433:1 (czerń: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.265
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Medion Erazer Defender P40
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Gigabyte G5 KE
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16.00
Display
3%
-44%
-0%
-39%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
69.3
71.2
3%
38.1
-45%
68.3
-1%
40.7
-41%
69.4
0%
sRGB Coverage
97.3
98.8
2%
56.8
-42%
98.1
1%
61
-37%
97.8
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.7
73.3
4%
39.3
-44%
69.8
-1%
42.1
-40%
70.9
0%
Response Times
2%
-159%
10%
-79%
-5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3)
14.5 ?(7, 7.5)
7%
38.8 ?(18.6, 20.2)
-149%
14.6 ?(7.1, 7.5)
6%
26.64 ?(12.52, 14.12)
-71%
17 ?(8, 9)
-9%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(5.7, 4.3)
10.4 ?(5.7, 4.7)
-4%
26.8 ?(14.2, 12.6)
-168%
8.7 ?(3.6, 5.1)
13%
18.65 ?(10.83, 7.82)
-87%
10.1 ?(5.4, 4.7)
-1%
PWM Frequency
Screen
5%
-115%
7%
-113%
4%
Brightness middle
301
405.7
35%
261
-13%
364
21%
269
-11%
308
2%
Brightness
294
368
25%
258
-12%
343
17%
248
-16%
293
0%
Brightness Distribution
94
87
-7%
92
-2%
86
-9%
85
-10%
90
-4%
Black Level *
0.21
0.38
-81%
0.19
10%
0.28
-33%
0.5
-138%
0.23
-10%
Contrast
1433
1068
-25%
1374
-4%
1300
-9%
538
-62%
1339
-7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.79
1.65
8%
5.57
-211%
1.67
7%
4.54
-154%
1.47
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.48
4.2
-21%
20.6
-492%
2.78
20%
17.28
-397%
2.98
14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.2
0.53
56%
4.63
-286%
1.14
5%
3.34
-178%
1.02
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
1.2
52%
3.19
-28%
1.4
44%
3.8
-52%
2.2
12%
Gamma
2.265 97%
2.3 96%
2.45 90%
2.091 105%
2.17 101%
2.228 99%
CCT
6157 106%
6453 101%
6146 106%
6568 99%
7408 88%
6228 104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 4%
-106% / -106%
6% / 6%
-77% / -92%
-0% / 2%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Ex działa, ekran ma dobre odwzorowanie kolorów: Odchylenie około 1,8 jest akceptowalne (DeltaE < 3). Kalibracja obniża ten wskaźnik do 1,2 i prowadzi do bardziej zrównoważonych odcieni szarości. Panel jest w stanie odwzorować całą przestrzeń kolorów sRGB, ale nie AdobeRGB i DCI P3. Jest to podobne do większości wyświetlaczy konkurencji.

CalMAN: Skala szarości
CalMAN: Skala szarości
CalMAN: Nasycenie
CalMAN: Nasycenie
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Skala szarości (skalibrowana)
CalMAN: Skala szarości (skalibrowana)
CalMAN: Nasycenie (skalibrowane)
CalMAN: Nasycenie (skalibrowane)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (skalibrowany)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (skalibrowany)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs sRGB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs sRGB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs AdobeRGB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs AdobeRGB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs DCI-P3
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.7 ms rise
↘ 4.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.3 ms rise
↘ 8.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18694 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Stabilny pod kątem widzenia panel IPS laptopa pozostaje czytelny pod każdym kątem. Możliwe jest oglądanie panelu na zewnątrz - o ile słońce nie świeci zbyt mocno.

A16 na zewnątrz.
A16 na zewnątrz.
kąty widzenia
kąty widzenia

Wydajność - Asus wykorzystuje moc AMD

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS to średniej klasy laptop do gier. Sprzęt AMD zapewnia niezbędną moc obliczeniową. Obecny model można nabyć za około 1700 dolarów.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 
 

Warunki testowania

Można przełączać się między trzema profilami wydajności specyficznymi dla producenta (patrz tabela) za pomocą kombinacji klawiszy "Fn" + "F5". Użyto profili "Wydajność" (benchmarki) i "Cichy" (testy baterii). Tryb GPU był ustawiony na "Standardowy" (= przełączanie grafiki). Centrum sterowania notebooka ("Armoury Crate") umożliwia tworzenie indywidualnych profili ("Manual"), które obejmują ustawienie krzywych PPT i wentylatora.

Turbo Wydajność Cisza
Limit mocy 1 (HWInfo) 120 watów 105 watów 75 watów
Limit mocy 2 (HWInfo) 144 waty 114 watów 90 watów
Hałas (Wichter 3) 53 dB(A) 51 dB(A) 46 dB(A)
Wydajność (Witcher 3) ~100 fps ~100 fps ~94 fps
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni

Procesor

Część procesoraRyzen-9-7940HS-APU (Phoenix, Zen 4) posiada osiem rdzeni obliczeniowych z 16 wątkami. Bazowa częstotliwość taktowania 4 GHz może zostać zwiększona do 5,25 GHz (jeden rdzeń). Zmierzone przez nas wyniki benchmarków są mniej więcej takie same, jak w przypadku wcześniej testowanych laptopów 7940HS. Użycie profilu "Turbo" prowadzi do nieco lepszej wydajności (4-5 procent).

Siostrzany model Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition w recenzji: Notebook AMD pod patronatem 7 Ryzen-7-7735HS-APU (Rembrandt R, Zen 3+) jest wyraźnie pokonany przez Ryzena 9, nawet przy tej samej liczbie rdzeni i tych samych limitach mocy. Dzięki lepszej architekturze i wyższym częstotliwościom taktowania, jego wydajność w przeliczeniu na wat jest wyższa.

Pokazuje to test pętli CB15: Ciągłe obciążenie wielowątkowe prowadzi procesor do pracy z niezmiennie wysokimi częstotliwościami taktowania turbo - niezależnie od wybranego profilu wydajności.

Uwaga: Szczegółowe informacje na temat zainstalowanego APU i jego architektury można przeczytać w naszym artykule analitycznymZen4.

wielowątkowy (podłączony do sieci)
wielowątkowy (podłączony do sieci)
jednowątkowy (podłączony do sieci)
jednowątkowy (podłączony do sieci)

Cinebench R15 multi continuous test

01653304956608259901155132014851650181519802145231024752640280529703135Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø3057 (3008.42-3230.23)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1968 (1876.44-2253.14)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2369 (2270.92-3189.19)
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2063 (1956.47-2112.49)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2250 (2235.89-2298.72)
Pętla CB15 (wydajność)
Pętla CB15 (wydajność)
Pętla CB15 (turbo)
Pętla CB15 (turbo)
Pętla CB15 (cicha)
Pętla CB15 (cicha)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
77.2 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
 
73.8 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
73.7 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
71.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
69.8 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
60.8 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
58.3 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
56.3 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
20341 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
19987 (10270.1min - 19987.3max) Points +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=237, last 2 years)
17979 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (16285 - 18131, n=6)
17145 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
16907 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
15537 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
13995 Points -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
13155 Points -22%
Single Core
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (1774 - 1815, n=6)
1796 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1791 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2169, n=235, last 2 years)
1759 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
1697 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1668 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1666 Points -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
1629 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1561 Points -13%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
7710 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
6889 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=235, last 2 years)
6821 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (6417 - 7111, n=6)
6691 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6571 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
6009 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5441 Points -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
5066 Points -23%
CPU (Single Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (697 - 711, n=6)
704 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
702 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 825, n=235, last 2 years)
678 Points -3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
652 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
652 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
644 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
627 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
612 Points -13%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
3230 (3008.42min - 3230.23max) Points +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
3189 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=241, last 2 years)
2860 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (2633 - 2848, n=6)
2707 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2666.7 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
2299 (2235.89min - 2298.72max) Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
2253 (1876.44min - 2253.14max) Points -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
2112 (1956.47min - 2112.49max) Points -21%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (283 - 288, n=6)
285 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
283 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
265 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 312, n=240, last 2 years)
261 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
248 Points -12%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
247 Points -13%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
245 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
243 Points -14%
Blender
v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
234 Seconds * -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
230 Seconds * -22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
225 Seconds * -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=233, last 2 years)
215 Seconds * -14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
198 Seconds * -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
189 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (182 - 199, n=5)
188.6 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
151 Seconds * +20%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H (3.3.3)
441 Seconds * -47%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H (3.3.2)
423 Seconds * -41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (3.3.3)
376 Seconds * -25%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX (3.3.3)
345 Seconds * -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 907, n=159, last 2 years)
319 Seconds * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (287 - 330, n=6)
305 Seconds * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (3.3.3)
301 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX (3.3.3)
264 Seconds * +12%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
78076 MIPS +11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
72220 MIPS +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=232, last 2 years)
71662 MIPS +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (66408 - 73434, n=6)
70428 MIPS 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
70081 MIPS
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
61292 MIPS -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
59034 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
54380 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (6417 - 6776, n=6)
6634 MIPS 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6621 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=233, last 2 years)
5977 MIPS -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5779 MIPS -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
5718 MIPS -14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
5552 MIPS -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
5537 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
5383 MIPS -19%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
14222 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
14144 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=239, last 2 years)
12714 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12111 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (11207 - 12500, n=7)
11808 Points -3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
11198 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
10260 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9836 Points -19%
Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2032 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (1823 - 2032, n=7)
1977 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1777 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2139, n=239, last 2 years)
1760 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
1667 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1666 Points -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
1647 Points -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1574 Points -23%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
24.2 fps +16%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (20.1 - 22.6, n=5)
21.1 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
20.8 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
20.8 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=236, last 2 years)
19.8 fps -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
17.5 fps -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
17.4 fps -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
16.6 fps -20%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
59.1 s * -42%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
57.7 s * -38%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
49.8 s * -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=231, last 2 years)
49 s * -18%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
47 s * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (36.9 - 51.1, n=6)
42.1 s * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
41.7 s *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
36.5 s * +12%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
0.5 sec * -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
0.493 sec * -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
0.4904 sec * -15%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
0.4865 sec * -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.375 - 4.47, n=233, last 2 years)
0.482 sec * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
0.4769 sec * -12%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (0.4159 - 0.4392, n=6)
0.4254 sec * -0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4253 sec *

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2666.7 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
188.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
283 Points
Pomoc
Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
 
95 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
93.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
76.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
72.7 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
69.9 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65.3 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
28033 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (25226 - 29109, n=4)
27129 KRay/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
20413 KRay/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
16661 KRay/s -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 60169, n=229, last 2 years)
16453 KRay/s -41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
15620 KRay/s -44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
15397 KRay/s -45%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
12542 KRay/s -55%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
122098 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (106512 - 123132, n=4)
117003 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
103903 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
101275 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 252486, n=229, last 2 years)
82705 Points -32%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
77807 Points -36%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
76434 Points -37%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
65919 Points -46%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (4566 - 5097, n=4)
4829 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
4633 MB/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
4566 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=229, last 2 years)
3953 MB/s -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
3494 MB/s -23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
3412 MB/s -25%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
3244 MB/s -29%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
3212 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
124433 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (119569 - 124783, n=4)
122288 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
113990 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
113837 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=229, last 2 years)
105086 Points -16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
104709 Points -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
87225 Points -30%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
80337 Points -35%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
15380 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (14835 - 15551, n=4)
15270 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
13285 Points -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
12691 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=229, last 2 years)
11525 Points -25%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
10407 Points -32%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
8694 Points -43%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
7388 Points -52%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
63432 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (56839 - 65943, n=4)
62108 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
55209 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
50250 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 134044, n=229, last 2 years)
43239 Points -32%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
38311 Points -40%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
37738 Points -41%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
31844 Points -50%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
110639 MB/s +28%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (86309 - 169089, n=4)
107603 MB/s +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (18146 - 328679, n=229, last 2 years)
103933 MB/s +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
94177 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
86309 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
72510 MB/s -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
66845 MB/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
64725 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
1339 MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=229, last 2 years)
1113 MB/s +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (1088 - 1152, n=4)
1111 MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
1089 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
981 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
924 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
883 MB/s -19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
879 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
15209 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (13175 - 15636, n=4)
14623 KRay/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
11057 KRay/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 31796, n=229, last 2 years)
8954 KRay/s -41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
8923 KRay/s -41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
8448 KRay/s -44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
8145 KRay/s -46%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
6989 KRay/s -54%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
37023 MPixel/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
36147 MPixel/s +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
36118 MPixel/s +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 60161, n=230, last 2 years)
34937 MPixel/s +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (29922 - 32647, n=4)
31690 MPixel/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
29922 MPixel/s
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
29085 MPixel/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
27871 MPixel/s -7%

Wydajność systemu

Płynnie działający system zapewnia wystarczającą wydajność dla wymagających obszarów zastosowań, takich jak renderowanie, edycja wideo i gry - dobre wyniki PCMark mogą to potwierdzić. Transfery pamięci RAM są na normalnym poziomie dla pamięci DDR5 4800 RAM. Co ważne: automatyczne przełączanie pomiędzy dGPU i iGPU (Smart Access Graphic) zawsze trwa sekundę lub dwie. W tym czasie system zawiesza się.

Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dwukanałowym.
Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dwukanałowym.
PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
7927 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
7927 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
7691 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4477 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)
7473 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7332 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
7201 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
6909 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
6892 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
11150 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
10872 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
10844 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
10844 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (7334 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)
10653 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10622 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10180 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9760 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
10505 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
10505 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9760 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9744 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)
9638 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
9475 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9332 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
9131 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
12434 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
11868 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
11868 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (5288 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)
11113 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10790 Points -9%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
9593 Points -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9393 Points -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
8957 Points -25%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2295, n=160, last 2 years)
1852 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1774 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1774 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
1774 Points 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1752 Points -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1718 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1663 Points -6%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2166, n=160, last 2 years)
1770 Points +3%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1720 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1715 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
1715 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1653 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1643 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1618 Points -6%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2514, n=160, last 2 years)
2002 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1992 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1990 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
1990 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1840 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1778 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1710 Points -14%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1771 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2275, n=160, last 2 years)
1696 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1663 Points +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1577 Points +14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1570 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1388 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
1388 Points 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5937 pkt.
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6458 pkt.
PCMark 10 Score
7927 pkt.
Pomoc
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (59712 - 69089, n=4)
62953 MB/s +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
59712 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
58458 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57466 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 88014, n=229, last 2 years)
56650 MB/s -5%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56560 MB/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
48549 MB/s -19%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44445 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67644 MB/s +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67639 MB/s +10%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65535 MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
61609 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 89096, n=229, last 2 years)
60251 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (50399 - 61609, n=4)
58568 MB/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
50338 MB/s -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
47514 MB/s -23%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (72541 - 91567, n=4)
80263 MB/s +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
72541 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65896 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 103259, n=229, last 2 years)
58943 MB/s -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57744 MB/s -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
57505 MB/s -21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
55012 MB/s -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
46901 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
96.1 ns * -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
94.9 ns * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (87.6 - 111.1, n=4)
94.8 ns * -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
93 ns * -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
90.4 ns *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
84.6 ns * +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (76.2 - 136.8, n=226, last 2 years)
82.7 ns * +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81.9 ns * +9%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienie DPC

Standardowy test monitora opóźnień (surfowanie po sieci, odtwarzanie wideo 4k, wysokie obciążenie Prime95) ujawnił pewne anomalie. System nie wydaje się być odpowiedni do edycji wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą doprowadzić do poprawy lub nawet pogorszenia wydajności.

Monitor opóźnień
Monitor opóźnień
Monitor opóźnień
Monitor opóźnień
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7213.9 μs * -539%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4343.1 μs * -285%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1128.7 μs *
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1002.5 μs * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
869.7 μs * +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
237.9 μs * +79%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Urządzenia pamięci masowej

Asus wyposażył A16 w dysk SSD o pojemności 512 GB (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) firmy Micron - (zbyt) mało przestrzeni dyskowej jak na notebooka do gier. Zapewnia on przyzwoite prędkości przesyłu danych, ale nie jest jednym z najlepszych modeli wśród wszystkich dostępnych dysków SSD. Zwłaszcza szybkość zapisu jest znacznie poniżej dzisiejszych możliwości.

Dysk SSD PCIe-4 służy jako dysk systemowy.
Dysk SSD PCIe-4 służy jako dysk systemowy.
Jest miejsce na drugi dysk SSD.
Jest miejsce na drugi dysk SSD.
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4285 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1772 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 482 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 269.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2316 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1674 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.92 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119.5 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
86.9 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
77.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
74.1 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
64.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
59.2 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
54.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
44.9 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
 
33.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
5346 (4832.89min - 5346.06max) MB/s +137%
Average of class Gaming
  (1291 - 6045, n=199, last 2 years)
3407 MB/s +51%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
2501 (2479.67min - 2500.68max) MB/s +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2460 (2456.1min - 2460.17max) MB/s +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2390 (2088.15min - 2390.38max) MB/s +6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2291 (2271.71min - 2290.75max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
2253 (2206.83min - 2252.55max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1748 - 2253, n=5)
1891 MB/s -16%
seq write
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4675 (4517.46min - 4675.27max) MB/s +180%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9108, n=199, last 2 years)
3663 MB/s +119%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2991 (2932.66min - 2991.48max) MB/s +79%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2903 (2823.62min - 2902.74max) MB/s +74%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2230 (2171.45min - 2229.69max) MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1671 (1641.02min - 1670.59max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1519 - 1671, n=5)
1585 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1495 (1277.34min - 1495.48max) MB/s -11%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
7127 (6535.15min - 7127.37max) MB/s +66%
Average of class Gaming
  (1620 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)
6073 MB/s +41%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
5009 (4674.55min - 5008.89max) MB/s +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
4725 (4035.45min - 4724.88max) MB/s +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4633 (4029.05min - 4633.45max) MB/s +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4556 (3742.64min - 4556.27max) MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
4294 (3669.6min - 4293.91max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (3234 - 4294, n=5)
3728 MB/s -13%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
4903 (812.65min - 4902.98max) MB/s +177%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4797 (4359.23min - 4796.61max) MB/s +171%
Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)
4534 MB/s +156%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3415 (3353.98min - 3415.42max) MB/s +93%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3411 (3334.51min - 3410.81max) MB/s +92%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2255 (2245.25min - 2255.17max) MB/s +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1773 (1734.23min - 1773.16max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1610 - 1773, n=5)
1682 MB/s -5%
4k q1 t1 read
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 97.4, n=199, last 2 years)
68.5 MB/s +109%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
65.9 (62.88min - 65.94max) MB/s +101%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
62.6 (62.25min - 62.63max) MB/s +91%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
51.1 (49.74min - 51.1max) MB/s +56%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
35.5 (35.31min - 35.47max) MB/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
32.8 (32.61min - 32.76max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (29.9 - 32.8, n=5)
31.9 MB/s -3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
31.8 (31.24min - 31.76max) MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
369 (333.31min - 369.47max) MB/s +180%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
328 (300.52min - 328.36max) MB/s +148%