Recenzja XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23): Laptop RTX 4070 dla graczy i twórców

Harmonijny. Według firmy Schenker, XMG Pro 16 Studio to "profesjonalna stacja robocza do tworzenia treści". Specyfikacja pasuje: Core i9, RTX 4070, Thunderbolt 4 i wyświetlacz 16:10 (QHD+, 240 Hz). Komora parowa ma zapewnić optymalne rozpraszanie ciepła i ciche chłodzenie.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (tłumaczenie DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 23/10/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows Workstation

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) - 16-calowy laptop dla graczy i twórców - bazuje na barebone (PE60RNE-S) wyprodukowanym przez Clevo, a obecny wariant można obecnie znaleźć za około 2400 USD. Konkurenci to między innymiLenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8, HP Omen Transcend 16, Asus Vivobook Pro 16X orazMSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG.

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)

Procesor

Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Karta grafiki

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 2175 MHz, pamięć: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3758, Optimus

Pamięć

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Matryca

16.00 cali 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pikseli 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, refleksująca: nie, 240 Hz

Chipset

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Dysk twardy

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB

, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 875 GB wolne miejsce

Karta dźwiękowa

Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH

Złącza

2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: Headset combined port, Mic-in, czytnik kart: MicroSD, TPM 2.0

Łączność

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5

Gabaryty

wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 19.9 x 359.5 x 273

Akumulator

73 Wh, 4600 mAh litowo-polimerowy

System operacyjny

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

kamerka: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Inne

głośniki: Stereo, klawiatura: Chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, Mousepad, USB-Thumbdrive (Driver, Applications), Bottle Opener, Thermalpad (SSD), Screw (SSD), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji

Waga

2.56 kg, zasilacz: 556 g

Cena

2256 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

pełna specyfikacja

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.9 %	10/2023	XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.2 %	07/2023	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	22.8 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
90 %	07/2023	Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.9 %	08/2023	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.8 %	07/2023	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2 kg	19.95 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

Obudowa i łączność - Clevo barebone z Thunderbolt 4

Matowo-czarna pokrywa i spód obudowy wykonane są z aluminium, a reszta z tworzywa sztucznego. Subtelnie zaprojektowana obudowa jest dobrze wykonana. Podstawa i pokrywa mogą być lekko skręcone, ale nie ma się czym martwić. Dostęp do akumulatora (przykręconego, a nie przyklejonego), a także reszty wnętrza laptopa można uzyskać po zdjęciu dolnej płyty.

Pro posiada dwa porty USB-A (USB 3.2 Gen 1) i dwa porty USB-C (1x USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1x Thunderbolt 4). Port TB-4 obsługuje funkcję Power Delivery i może wyprowadzać sygnał DisplayPort. Łącznie laptop posiada trzy wyjścia wideo (1x HDMI, 2x DP). Jego czytnik kart MicroSD (karta referencyjna: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) można sklasyfikować jako jeden z przeciętnych prędkości. Kamera internetowa (2,1 MP, maks. 1 920 x 1 080 pikseli, bez osłony) jest dość standardowa.

W optymalnych warunkach (brak urządzeń WiFi w pobliżu, niewielka odległość między laptopem a serwerem PC) osiąga doskonałe prędkości transmisji danych WiFi. W laptopie zastosowano układ WiFi 6E (Intel AX211), a za połączenia przewodowe odpowiada kontroler Realtek RTL8125 (2,5 GBit/s).

Porównanie rozmiarów

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 HP Omen Transcend 16 MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG DIN A4 ❌

Lewa strona: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), wejście mikrofonowe, combo audio

Prawa strona: Czytnik kart microSD, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), gniazdo na blokadę kabla

Tył: Złącze zasilania, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C), HDMI 2.1, Mini DisplayPort 1.4a, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	158 (154.8^min - 166.31^max) MB/s +84%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	120 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=90, last 2 years)	95.1 MB/s +11%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	86 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	84.2 MB/s -2%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	180.68 MB/s +101%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	126 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years)	119 MB/s +32%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	90 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	89.7 MB/s 0%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1444 (1147^min - 1531^max) MBit/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1444 (1170^min - 1766^max) MBit/s +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1386 (708^min - 1471^max) MBit/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1325 (977^min - 1480^max) MBit/s -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1861, n=229)	1238 MBit/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1232 MBit/s -11%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1151 (615^min - 1213^max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1714 (1675^min - 1737^max) MBit/s 0%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1714 (1696^min - 1727^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=229)	1382 MBit/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=152, last 2 years)	1378 MBit/s -20%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1364 (675^min - 1404^max) MBit/s -20%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1339 (1216^min - 1449^max) MBit/s -22%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1287 (679^min - 1410^max) MBit/s -25%

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1362 (708-1471)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1147-1531)

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1131 (615-1213)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1170-1766)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1325 (977-1480)

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (1696-1727)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (1675-1737)

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1264 (679-1410)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1216-1449)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1341 (675-1404)

ColorChecker XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23): 5.8 ∆E min: 1.38 - max: 10.18 ∆E

Urządzenia wejściowe - laptop XMG posiada podświetlane klawisze

Równe, gładkie klawisze klawiatury typu chiclet (podświetlenie RGB) charakteryzują się średnim skokiem i wyraźnym punktem nacisku. Opór klawiszy mógłby być nieco bardziej wyraźny. Podsumowując, Schenker dostarczył klawiaturę nadającą się do codziennego użytku. Clickpad działa jako zamiennik myszy (około 15,1 x 9,1 cm), która charakteryzuje się krótkim skokiem i wyraźnym punktem nacisku.

Wyświetlacz - panel 16:10 z pokryciem sRGB

Szybko reagujący panel urządzenia o częstotliwości odświeżania 240 Hz i proporcjach 16:10 nie wykazuje żadnych oznak migotania PWM na żadnym poziomie jasności. Jasność i kontrast matowego, 16-calowego wyświetlacza (2560 x 1600 pikseli) osiągają swoje docelowe wartości (> 300 cd/m² i 1000:1). Alternatywne wyświetlacze nie są dostępne.


354 cd/m²	357 cd/m²	354 cd/m²
347 cd/m²	349 cd/m²	350 cd/m²
339 cd/m²	331 cd/m²	354 cd/m²

podświetlenie ekranu

BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

maksimum: 357 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 348.3 cd/m² Minimum: 35 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 93 %
na akumulatorze: 349 cd/m²
kontrast: 1091:1 (czerń: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.45
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.137

Download Plik ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Samsung SDC4178 ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA2-3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	HP Omen Transcend 16 AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		27%	2%	23%	21%
Display P3 Coverage	69.4	98.4 42%	70.4 1%	99.2 43%	96.4 39%
sRGB Coverage	98.2	99.7 2%	99.4 1%	100 2%	99.7 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.1	95.8 37%	72.5 3%	87.6 25%	84.8 21%
Response Times		85%	-7%	-191%	46%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	12.2 ?(5.9, 6.3)	1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8) 87%	12 ?(6, 6) 2%	26.4 ?(15, 11.4) -116%	4.4 ?(2.2, 2.2) 64%
Response Time Black / White *	7.7 ?(4, 3.7)	1.4 ?(0.6, 0.8) 82%	8.9 ?(5.1, 3.8) -16%	28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6) -266%	5.6 ?(2.2, 3.4) 27%
PWM Frequency		120 ?(100)		3506 ?(100)
Screen		66%	17%	204%	-19%
Brightness middle	349	347 -1%	474.6 36%	791.1 127%	424 21%
Brightness	348	346 -1%	445 28%	800 130%	411 18%
Brightness Distribution	93	97 4%	86 -8%	95 2%	88 -5%
Black Level *	0.32	0.06 81%	0.39 -22%	0.04 87%	0.37 -16%
Contrast	1091	5783 430%	1217 12%	19778 1713%	1146 5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.98	1.89 5%	2.12 -7%	4.37 -121%	3.04 -54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.56	3.26 57%	4.73 37%	10.39 -37%	7.5 1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.45	1.97 -36%	0.57 61%	1.04 28%	3.04 -110%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.3	1.55 53%	2.8 15%	6.5 -97%	4.34 -32%
Gamma	2.137 ^103%	2.39 ^92%	2.22 ^99%	2.28 ^96%	2.32 ^95%
CCT	6672 ^97%	6458 ^101%	6542 ^99%	6000 ^108%	6952 ^93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		59% / 60%	4% / 10%	12% / 109%	16% / -1%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Zaraz po wyjęciu z pudełka ekran pokazuje całkiem dobre odwzorowanie kolorów: Z odchyleniem około 2, cel (DeltaE < 3) został osiągnięty. Kalibracja wyświetlacza prowadzi do mniejszego odchylenia 1,45 i bardziej zrównoważonych odcieni szarości. Panel jest w stanie niemal w całości odwzorować przestrzeń barw sRGB - ale nie AdobeRGB czy DCI P3. Tutaj konkurencja ma czasami więcej do zaoferowania.

CalMAN: Nasycenie kolorów (skalibrowane)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
7.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.9 ms rise
12.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17146 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Stabilny pod kątem widzenia panel IPS laptopa pozostaje czytelny pod każdym kątem. Na zewnątrz można czytać z wyświetlacza, o ile słońce nie świeci zbyt mocno.

Wydajność - laptop Schenker opiera się na Raptor Lake i Ada Lovelace

Zorientowany na graczy i twórców XMG Pro 16 Studio opiera się na Raptor Lake i Ada Lovelace. Certyfikat GeForce RTX Studio ma gwarantować wysoką wydajność, niestandardowe sterowniki, dobre wsparcie oprogramowania i odpowiednie pokrycie przestrzeni kolorów wyświetlacza. Laptop można indywidualnie skonfigurować za pośrednictwem sklepu internetowego Schenker. Obecny wariant można nabyć za około 2 400 USD, a tańsze modele zaczynają się od około 1 900 USD.

Warunki testowania

Pro oferuje cztery tryby wydajności specyficzne dla producenta (patrz tabela), między którymi można przełączać się za pomocą oprogramowania Control Center (centrum sterowania laptopa). wykorzystano "Tryb rozrywki" (benchmarki) i "Tryb oszczędzania energii" (testy baterii). Tryb Optimus był aktywny.

	Tryb rozrywki	Tryb wydajności	Tryb oszczędzania energii	Tryb cichy
Limit mocy 1 (HWInfo)	70 watów	100 watów	15 watów	15 watów
Limit mocy 2 (HWInfo)	90 watów	120 watów	30 watów	30 watów
Hałas (Witcher 3)	48 dB(A)	55 dB (A)	-	42 dB (A)
Wydajność (Witcher 3)	~114 fps	~118 fps	-	~100-114 fps

Procesor

ProcesorCore i9-13900H(6P, 8E) z 14 rdzeniami CPU osiąga maksymalne taktowanie na poziomie 5,4 GHz (P) i 4,1 GHz (E). Stałe obciążenie wielowątkowe (CB15 Loop) doprowadziło do nieznacznego spadku częstotliwości taktowania od pierwszego do czwartego uruchomienia. Następnie wartości pozostały na stałym poziomie.

Zmierzyliśmy wyniki benchmarków nieco powyżej wcześniej ustalonej średniej CPU (podłączonego do sieci). W trybie bateryjnym bardziej istotna wydajność jednowątkowa (158 punktów; CB15) spadła w większym stopniu niż wydajność wielowątkowa (1696 punktów; CB15).

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2574 (2525.07-2739.09)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø3763 (3529.2-4703.12)

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2707 (2663.47-2966.92)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2552 (2375.16-3030.99)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	80.7 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	79.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 ^-1! Intel Core i9-13900H	70.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	67.3 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	62.6 pt
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	62.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	59.4 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	28963 Points +64%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	25932 (23977.8^min - 25931.6^max) Points +46%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=199, last 2 years)	21435 Points +21%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	20034 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	19844 (18048.8^min - 19843.9^max) Points +12%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	17706 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11997 - 20385, n=28)	16813 Points -5%
Single Core
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2105 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	2029 Points +5%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	1927 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=26)	1887 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=197, last 2 years)	1873 Points -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1854 Points -4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	1825 Points -5%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	11260 Points +66%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	9895 Points +46%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=197, last 2 years)	8152 Points +20%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	7674 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	7640 Points +13%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	6773 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4935 - 7716, n=25)	6533 Points -4%
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	805 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	775 Points +5%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	735 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=25)	720 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 855, n=197, last 2 years)	720 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	719 Points -2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	717 Points -2%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	4703 (3529.2^min - 4703.12^max) Points +72%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4100 (3846.15^min - 4100.04^max) Points +50%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=203, last 2 years)	3365 Points +23%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	2967 (2663.47^min - 2966.92^max) Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	2854 Points +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	2739 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=26)	2676 Points -2%
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	299 Points +8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	289 Points +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	278 Points
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=200, last 2 years)	276 Points -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	273 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=26)	269 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	233 Points -16%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=24)	205 Seconds * -10%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	186 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=192, last 2 years)	173.3 Seconds * +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	169 Seconds * +9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	136 Seconds * +27%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	123 Seconds * +34%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	105001 MIPS +53%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	104616 MIPS +53%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=196, last 2 years)	83789 MIPS +22%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	76344 MIPS +11%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	71321 MIPS +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	68491 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=25)	66435 MIPS -3%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	6972 MIPS +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6866 MIPS +6%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	6458 MIPS
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	6391 MIPS -1%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=196, last 2 years)	6267 MIPS -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	6125 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=25)	6054 MIPS -6%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	19012 Points +45%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	18475 Points +41%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=198, last 2 years)	14720 Points +13%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	13239 Points +1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	13072 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	12766 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=26)	12649 Points -3%
Single-Core
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2058 Points +11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	2001 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	1950 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=26)	1895 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=198, last 2 years)	1875 Points +1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	1861 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1829 Points -2%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	27 fps +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	26.2 fps +39%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=196, last 2 years)	23.1 fps +22%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	21.5 fps +14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	19.7 fps +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	18.9 fps
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.1 - 22.3, n=25)	18.5 fps -2%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	54.6 s * -24%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	51.4 s * -16%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=193, last 2 years)	47.7 s * -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=25)	47.6 s * -8%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	44.2 s *
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	43.8 s * +1%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	34.4 s * +22%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4498 sec * -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25)	0.4493 sec * -2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4412 sec *
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=197, last 2 years)	0.4404 sec * -0%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4182 sec * +5%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.4041 sec * +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4028 sec * +9%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2739 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

233 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

278 Points

Pomoc

... porównanie

Performance Rating
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	97.6 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	90.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	86.4 pt
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	67.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	23600 KRay/s +44%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=193, last 2 years)	21397 KRay/s +30%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	21332 KRay/s +30%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17934 KRay/s +9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17741 KRay/s +8%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	16419 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=25)	15135 KRay/s -8%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117390 Points +41%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	108001 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=193, last 2 years)	105383 Points +26%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89277 Points +7%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83334 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81656 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=25)	76236 Points -9%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	5888 MB/s +55%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	5264 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=193, last 2 years)	4806 MB/s +26%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4080 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3973 MB/s +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3809 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=25)	3561 MB/s -7%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	126758 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126217 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120299 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=193, last 2 years)	115833 Points +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105597 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=25)	105169 Points +1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	104502 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13785 Points +33%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13440 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=193, last 2 years)	13087 Points +26%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11232 Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11050 Points +7%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10361 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=25)	9675 Points -7%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58716 Points +43%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	53398 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=193, last 2 years)	53150 Points +30%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44368 Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44154 Points +8%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	40932 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=25)	37712 Points -8%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	141059 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	111789 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=193, last 2 years)	109968 MB/s -22%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	105169 MB/s -25%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=25)	87238 MB/s -38%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81504 MB/s -42%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81046 MB/s -43%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1689 MB/s +55%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1513 MB/s +39%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=193, last 2 years)	1336 MB/s +23%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1254 MB/s +15%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1088 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=25)	1040 MB/s -4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1032 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	12891 KRay/s +44%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=193, last 2 years)	11523 KRay/s +29%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	11431 KRay/s +28%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9680 KRay/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9570 KRay/s +7%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8955 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=25)	8215 KRay/s -8%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50609 MPixel/s +7%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47412 MPixel/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	46114 MPixel/s -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	43965 MPixel/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=25)	39722 MPixel/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=194, last 2 years)	39566 MPixel/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	23815 MPixel/s -50%

Wydajność systemu

Płynnie działającemu systemowi nie brakuje mocy obliczeniowej. Gry, renderowanie i edycja wideo należą do podstawowych kompetencji komputera. Szybkość transferu pamięci RAM jest na normalnym poziomie dla pamięci DDR5-5600 RAM.

Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dwukanałowym.

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8538 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	8153 Points +2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8010 Points
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=173, last 2 years)	7757 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5855 - 8538, n=8)	7664 Points -4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7329 Points -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	6883 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11940 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11329 Points -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	11302 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=172, last 2 years)	10829 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8835 - 11940, n=8)	10809 Points -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	10547 Points -12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10491 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10991 Points +5%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10425 Points
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=172, last 2 years)	9882 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7967 - 10991, n=8)	9840 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	9735 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	9376 Points -10%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	9030 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13562 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	13370 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=172, last 2 years)	11952 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7738 - 13575, n=8)	11549 Points +3%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11204 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10860 Points -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	9291 Points -17%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2050 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1974 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1970 Points +1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1955 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=157, last 2 years)	1892 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1104 - 1974, n=7)	1815 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1789 Points -8%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1919 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1914 Points +2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1884 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1812 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=157, last 2 years)	1796 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1058 - 1914, n=7)	1720 Points -9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1705 Points -10%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2353 Points +16%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2316 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2084 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=157, last 2 years)	2073 Points +2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2028 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1178 - 2254, n=7)	1982 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1936 Points -5%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1952 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1839 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=157, last 2 years)	1695 Points -13%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1651 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1037 - 1952, n=7)	1650 Points -15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1635 Points -16%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1557 Points -20%

PCMark 10 Score		8010 pkt.
Pomoc

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77103 MB/s +10%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70102 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69289 MB/s -1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	68474 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=193, last 2 years)	64246 MB/s -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=25)	61864 MB/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	37448 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84131 MB/s +12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	75581 MB/s 0%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	75433 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73950 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=193, last 2 years)	67972 MB/s -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=25)	62438 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41599 MB/s -45%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76244 MB/s +6%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72225 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71464 MB/s -1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67649 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=193, last 2 years)	65994 MB/s -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=25)	65109 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	36152 MB/s -50%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=193, last 2 years)	93.8 ns * -8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	89.9 ns * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (75.8 - 102.3, n=25)	89.3 ns * -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.8 ns * -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.6 ns * -1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.1 ns *
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.2 ns * +4%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienie DPC

Standardowy test monitora opóźnień (surfowanie po sieci, odtwarzanie wideo 4k, wysokie obciążenie Prime95) ujawnił pewne anomalie. System nie wydaje się być odpowiedni do edycji wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą doprowadzić do poprawy lub nawet pogorszenia wydajności.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	18226.8 μs * -881%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10410.4 μs * -460%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2472 μs * -33%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1857.6 μs *
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1518 μs * +18%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Urządzenia pamięci masowej

Pro 16 może pomieścić łącznie dwa dyski SSD PCIe 4 w formacie M.2-2280. Obsługiwany jest RAID-0/1. Dysk SSD Samsung (1 TB, PCIe 4, M.2-2280) w naszym urządzeniu testowym zapewnił doskonałe prędkości transferu. Pozytywne: Nie wystąpił throttling termiczny.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7122 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6782 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1011 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 730.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3528 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 4879 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 78.14 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 327.7 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	91.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.3 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	80.2 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	75.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	65.8 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	59.7 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	42.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4414 (4394.81^min - 4413.86^max) MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=174, last 2 years)	3508 MB/s +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3349 (938.07^min - 3349.15^max) MB/s +6%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2556 - 4234, n=16)	3256 MB/s +3%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3157 (2968.73^min - 3157.45^max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3023 (3010.73^min - 3023.25^max) MB/s -4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2353 (2142.12^min - 2352.79^max) MB/s -25%
seq write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3637 - 5842, n=16)	4843 MB/s +3%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4698 (3640.45^min - 4697.66^max) MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4485 (775.32^min - 4484.81^max) MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4306 (4280.74^min - 4306.08^max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=174, last 2 years)	3810 MB/s -19%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3152 (3026.22^min - 3152.01^max) MB/s -33%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2252 (2149.48^min - 2252.34^max) MB/s -52%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (7011 - 7148, n=16)	7098 MB/s 0%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7090 (6633.87^min - 7089.84^max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6899 (5306.42^min - 6899.46^max) MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6659 (5729.63^min - 6659.09^max) MB/s -6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	6460 (6020.84^min - 6459.94^max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=174, last 2 years)	6368 MB/s -10%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	3974 (3600.81^min - 3974.33^max) MB/s -44%
seq q8 t1 write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (6531 - 6898, n=16)	6810 MB/s +1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6770 (6323.06^min - 6770.24^max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5716 (5661.68^min - 5716.31^max) MB/s -16%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5007 (4969.96^min - 5007.21^max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=174, last 2 years)	4844 MB/s -28%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4803 (4344.79^min - 4802.73^max) MB/s -29%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2934 (2895.62^min - 2933.5^max) MB/s -57%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	94.1 (93.93^min - 94.12^max) MB/s +70%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (55.3 - 97.7, n=16)	76.2 MB/s +38%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.9 (64.79^min - 67.93^max) MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=174, last 2 years)	66.3 MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	56.3 (55.9^min - 56.3^max) MB/s +2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	55.3 (53.37^min - 55.32^max) MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	54.4 (50.25^min - 54.39^max) MB/s -2%
4k q1 t1 write
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	343 (338.95^min - 343.03^max) MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	253 (250.9^min - 252.85^max) MB/s -26%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	252 (249.53^min - 252.23^max) MB/s -27%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (146.3 - 343, n=16)	237 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=174, last 2 years)	221 MB/s -36%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	174.5 (172.12^min - 174.51^max) MB/s -49%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	127 (124.67^min - 127.01^max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 read
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4923 (4891.68^min - 4922.98^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4040 (4013.9^min - 4040.16^max) MB/s -18%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (818 - 4923, n=16)	3372 MB/s -32%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3013 (755.04^min - 3013.06^max) MB/s -39%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=174, last 2 years)	2576 MB/s -48%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	932 (919.54^min - 932.39^max) MB/s -81%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	906 (859.8^min - 906.06^max) MB/s -82%
4k q32 t16 write
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4394 (3486.17^min - 4394.19^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3555 (3527.21^min - 3555.07^max) MB/s -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2736 (1172^min - 2736.15^max) MB/s -38%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (413 - 4683, n=16)	2629 MB/s -40%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=174, last 2 years)	2110 MB/s -52%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	554 (543.86^min - 553.56^max) MB/s -87%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	501 (456.23^min - 501.33^max) MB/s -89%

AS SSD
Score Total
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10265 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8690 Points -15%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (5405 - 10265, n=16)	8262 Points -20%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7774 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=165, last 2 years)	6746 Points -34%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6291 Points -39%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	3959 Points -61%
Score Read
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4721 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3300 Points -30%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2959 Points -37%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1349 - 4721, n=16)	2909 Points -38%
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=165, last 2 years)	2450 Points -48%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1523 Points -68%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1215 Points -74%
Score Write
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4652 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	4064 Points -13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2308 - 4684, n=16)	3976 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3766 Points -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3331 Points -28%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=165, last 2 years)