Notebookcheck Logo

Recenzja XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23): Laptop RTX 4070 dla graczy i twórców

Harmonijny. Według firmy Schenker, XMG Pro 16 Studio to "profesjonalna stacja robocza do tworzenia treści". Specyfikacja pasuje: Core i9, RTX 4070, Thunderbolt 4 i wyświetlacz 16:10 (QHD+, 240 Hz). Komora parowa ma zapewnić optymalne rozpraszanie ciepła i ciche chłodzenie.
Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows Workstation

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) - 16-calowy laptop dla graczy i twórców - bazuje na barebone (PE60RNE-S) wyprodukowanym przez Clevo, a obecny wariant można obecnie znaleźć za około 2400 USD. Konkurenci to między innymiLenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8, HP Omen Transcend 16, Asus Vivobook Pro 16X orazMSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG.

 XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Procesor
Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Karta grafiki
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 2175 MHz, pamięć: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3758, Optimus
Pamięć
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Matryca
16.00 cali 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pikseli 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, refleksująca: nie, 240 Hz
Chipset
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Dysk twardy
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 875 GB wolne miejsce
Karta dźwiękowa
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH
Złącza
2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: Headset combined port, Mic-in, czytnik kart: MicroSD, TPM 2.0
Łączność
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5
Gabaryty
wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 19.9 x 359.5 x 273
Akumulator
73 Wh, 4600 mAh litowo-polimerowy
System operacyjny
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
kamerka: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Inne
głośniki: Stereo, klawiatura: Chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, Mousepad, USB-Thumbdrive (Driver, Applications), Bottle Opener, Thermalpad (SSD), Screw (SSD), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji
Waga
2.56 kg, zasilacz: 556 g
Cena
2256 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.9 %
10/2023
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.2 %
07/2023
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg22.8 mm16.00"3200x2000
90 %
07/2023
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.9 %
08/2023
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.8 %
07/2023
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2 kg19.95 mm16.00"2560x1600

Obudowa i łączność - Clevo barebone z Thunderbolt 4

Matowo-czarna pokrywa i spód obudowy wykonane są z aluminium, a reszta z tworzywa sztucznego. Subtelnie zaprojektowana obudowa jest dobrze wykonana. Podstawa i pokrywa mogą być lekko skręcone, ale nie ma się czym martwić. Dostęp do akumulatora (przykręconego, a nie przyklejonego), a także reszty wnętrza laptopa można uzyskać po zdjęciu dolnej płyty.

Pro posiada dwa porty USB-A (USB 3.2 Gen 1) i dwa porty USB-C (1x USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1x Thunderbolt 4). Port TB-4 obsługuje funkcję Power Delivery i może wyprowadzać sygnał DisplayPort. Łącznie laptop posiada trzy wyjścia wideo (1x HDMI, 2x DP). Jego czytnik kart MicroSD (karta referencyjna: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) można sklasyfikować jako jeden z przeciętnych prędkości. Kamera internetowa (2,1 MP, maks. 1 920 x 1 080 pikseli, bez osłony) jest dość standardowa.

W optymalnych warunkach (brak urządzeń WiFi w pobliżu, niewielka odległość między laptopem a serwerem PC) osiąga doskonałe prędkości transmisji danych WiFi. W laptopie zastosowano układ WiFi 6E (Intel AX211), a za połączenia przewodowe odpowiada kontroler Realtek RTL8125 (2,5 GBit/s).

XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
Sprzęt XMG Pro 16 Studio

Porównanie rozmiarów

359.5 mm 273 mm 19.9 mm 2.6 kg355 mm 251 mm 22.8 mm 2.1 kg357.7 mm 259.3 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 269 mm 19.8 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 260 mm 19.95 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Lewa strona: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), wejście mikrofonowe, combo audio
Lewa strona: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), wejście mikrofonowe, combo audio
Prawa strona: Czytnik kart microSD, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), gniazdo na blokadę kabla
Prawa strona: Czytnik kart microSD, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), gniazdo na blokadę kabla
Tył: Złącze zasilania, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C), HDMI 2.1, Mini DisplayPort 1.4a, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s)
Tył: Złącze zasilania, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C), HDMI 2.1, Mini DisplayPort 1.4a, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s)
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
158 (154.8min - 166.31max) MB/s +84%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
120 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +14%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
86 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.2 MB/s -2%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
180.68 MB/s +101%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
126 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s +35%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.7 MB/s 0%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1147min - 1531max) MBit/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1170min - 1766max) MBit/s +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1386 (708min - 1471max) MBit/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1325 (977min - 1480max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)
1272 MBit/s -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=183)
1248 MBit/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1151 (615min - 1213max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1714 (1675min - 1737max) MBit/s 0%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1714 (1696min - 1727max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)
1403 MBit/s -18%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=183)
1395 MBit/s -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1364 (675min - 1404max) MBit/s -20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1339 (1216min - 1449max) MBit/s -22%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1287 (679min - 1410max) MBit/s -25%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1362 (708-1471)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1147-1531)
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1131 (615-1213)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1170-1766)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1325 (977-1480)
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (1696-1727)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (1675-1737)
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1264 (679-1410)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1216-1449)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1341 (675-1404)
ColorChecker
6.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
ColorChecker XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23): 5.8 ∆E min: 1.38 - max: 10.18 ∆E

Urządzenia wejściowe - laptop XMG posiada podświetlane klawisze

Równe, gładkie klawisze klawiatury typu chiclet (podświetlenie RGB) charakteryzują się średnim skokiem i wyraźnym punktem nacisku. Opór klawiszy mógłby być nieco bardziej wyraźny. Podsumowując, Schenker dostarczył klawiaturę nadającą się do codziennego użytku. Clickpad działa jako zamiennik myszy (około 15,1 x 9,1 cm), która charakteryzuje się krótkim skokiem i wyraźnym punktem nacisku.

Klawiatura XMG Pro 16 Studio
Klawiatura XMG Pro 16 Studio

Wyświetlacz - panel 16:10 z pokryciem sRGB

Tablica subpikseli
Tablica subpikseli

Szybko reagujący panel urządzenia o częstotliwości odświeżania 240 Hz i proporcjach 16:10 nie wykazuje żadnych oznak migotania PWM na żadnym poziomie jasności. Jasność i kontrast matowego, 16-calowego wyświetlacza (2560 x 1600 pikseli) osiągają swoje docelowe wartości (> 300 cd/m² i 1000:1). Alternatywne wyświetlacze nie są dostępne.

354
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
podświetlenie ekranu
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
maksimum: 357 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 348.3 cd/m² Minimum: 35 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 93 %
na akumulatorze: 349 cd/m²
kontrast: 1091:1 (czerń: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.45
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.137
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Samsung SDC4178 ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
CSOT T3 MNG007DA2-3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP Omen Transcend 16
AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16.00
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
27%
2%
23%
21%
Display P3 Coverage
69.4
98.4
42%
70.4
1%
99.2
43%
96.4
39%
sRGB Coverage
98.2
99.7
2%
99.4
1%
100
2%
99.7
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.1
95.8
37%
72.5
3%
87.6
25%
84.8
21%
Response Times
85%
-7%
-191%
46%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.2 ?(5.9, 6.3)
1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8)
87%
12 ?(6, 6)
2%
26.4 ?(15, 11.4)
-116%
4.4 ?(2.2, 2.2)
64%
Response Time Black / White *
7.7 ?(4, 3.7)
1.4 ?(0.6, 0.8)
82%
8.9 ?(5.1, 3.8)
-16%
28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6)
-266%
5.6 ?(2.2, 3.4)
27%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
3506 ?(100)
Screen
66%
17%
204%
-19%
Brightness middle
349
347
-1%
474.6
36%
791.1
127%
424
21%
Brightness
348
346
-1%
445
28%
800
130%
411
18%
Brightness Distribution
93
97
4%
86
-8%
95
2%
88
-5%
Black Level *
0.32
0.06
81%
0.39
-22%
0.04
87%
0.37
-16%
Contrast
1091
5783
430%
1217
12%
19778
1713%
1146
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.98
1.89
5%
2.12
-7%
4.37
-121%
3.04
-54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.56
3.26
57%
4.73
37%
10.39
-37%
7.5
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.45
1.97
-36%
0.57
61%
1.04
28%
3.04
-110%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
1.55
53%
2.8
15%
6.5
-97%
4.34
-32%
Gamma
2.137 103%
2.39 92%
2.22 99%
2.28 96%
2.32 95%
CCT
6672 97%
6458 101%
6542 99%
6000 108%
6952 93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
59% / 60%
4% / 10%
12% / 109%
16% / -1%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Zaraz po wyjęciu z pudełka ekran pokazuje całkiem dobre odwzorowanie kolorów: Z odchyleniem około 2, cel (DeltaE < 3) został osiągnięty. Kalibracja wyświetlacza prowadzi do mniejszego odchylenia 1,45 i bardziej zrównoważonych odcieni szarości. Panel jest w stanie niemal w całości odwzorować przestrzeń barw sRGB - ale nie AdobeRGB czy DCI P3. Tutaj konkurencja ma czasami więcej do zaoferowania.

CalMAN: Skala szarości
CalMAN: Skala szarości
CalMAN: Nasycenie kolorów
CalMAN: Nasycenie kolorów
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Skala szarości (skalibrowana)
CalMAN: Skala szarości (skalibrowana)
CalMAN: Nasycenie kolorów (skalibrowane)
CalMAN: Nasycenie kolorów (skalibrowane)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (skalibrowany)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (skalibrowany)
XMG Pro 16 Studio vs sRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio vs sRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio vs AdobeRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio vs AdobeRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio vs DCI-P3
XMG Pro 16 Studio vs DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
7.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 3.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.9 ms rise
↘ 6.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Stabilny pod kątem widzenia panel IPS laptopa pozostaje czytelny pod każdym kątem. Na zewnątrz można czytać z wyświetlacza, o ile słońce nie świeci zbyt mocno.

XMG Pro 16 na zewnątrz.
XMG Pro 16 na zewnątrz.

Wydajność - laptop Schenker opiera się na Raptor Lake i Ada Lovelace

Zorientowany na graczy i twórców XMG Pro 16 Studio opiera się na Raptor Lake i Ada Lovelace. Certyfikat GeForce RTX Studio ma gwarantować wysoką wydajność, niestandardowe sterowniki, dobre wsparcie oprogramowania i odpowiednie pokrycie przestrzeni kolorów wyświetlacza. Laptop można indywidualnie skonfigurować za pośrednictwem sklepu internetowego Schenker. Obecny wariant można nabyć za około 2 400 USD, a tańsze modele zaczynają się od około 1 900 USD.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Informacje o systemie Nvidia
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 
 

Warunki testowania

Pro oferuje cztery tryby wydajności specyficzne dla producenta (patrz tabela), między którymi można przełączać się za pomocą oprogramowania Control Center (centrum sterowania laptopa). wykorzystano "Tryb rozrywki" (benchmarki) i "Tryb oszczędzania energii" (testy baterii). Tryb Optimus był aktywny.

Tryb rozrywki Tryb wydajności Tryb oszczędzania energii Tryb cichy
Limit mocy 1 (HWInfo) 70 watów 100 watów 15 watów 15 watów
Limit mocy 2 (HWInfo) 90 watów 120 watów 30 watów 30 watów
Hałas (Witcher 3) 48 dB(A) 55 dB (A) - 42 dB (A)
Wydajność (Witcher 3) ~114 fps ~118 fps - ~100-114 fps
Centrum Kontroli
Centrum Kontroli
Centrum Kontroli
Centrum Kontroli
Centrum Kontroli
Centrum Kontroli

Procesor

ProcesorCore i9-13900H(6P, 8E) z 14 rdzeniami CPU osiąga maksymalne taktowanie na poziomie 5,4 GHz (P) i 4,1 GHz (E). Stałe obciążenie wielowątkowe (CB15 Loop) doprowadziło do nieznacznego spadku częstotliwości taktowania od pierwszego do czwartego uruchomienia. Następnie wartości pozostały na stałym poziomie.

Zmierzyliśmy wyniki benchmarków nieco powyżej wcześniej ustalonej średniej CPU (podłączonego do sieci). W trybie bateryjnym bardziej istotna wydajność jednowątkowa (158 punktów; CB15) spadła w większym stopniu niż wydajność wielowątkowa (1696 punktów; CB15).

Wielowątkowy (podłączony do sieci)
Wielowątkowy (podłączony do sieci)
Jednowątkowy (podłączony do sieci)
Jednowątkowy (podłączony do sieci)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0240480720960120014401680192021602400264028803120336036003840408043204560Tooltip
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2574 (2525.07-2739.09)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø3763 (3529.2-4703.12)
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2707 (2663.47-2966.92)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2552 (2375.16-3030.99)
CB15 Loop (Rozrywka)
CB15 Loop (Rozrywka)
Pętla CB15 (wydajność)
Pętla CB15 (wydajność)
Pętla CB15 (oszczędzanie energii)
Pętla CB15 (oszczędzanie energii)
Pętla CB15 (cicha)
Pętla CB15 (cicha)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
80.9 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
79.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 -1!
Intel Core i9-13900H
70.7 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
62.8 pt
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
62.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
62.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
60.4 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
28963 Points +64%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
25932 (23977.8min - 25931.6max) Points +46%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
20034 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
19844 (18048.8min - 19843.9max) Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)
19514 Points +10%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
17706 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (13177 - 20385, n=25)
17182 Points -3%
Single Core
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2105 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
2029 Points +5%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
1927 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1297 - 2054, n=23)
1906 Points -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
1854 Points -4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
1825 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)
1813 Points -6%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
11260 Points +66%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
9895 Points +46%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
7674 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
7640 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7419 Points +10%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6773 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (4960 - 7716, n=22)
6689 Points -1%
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
805 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
775 Points +5%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
735 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (428 - 792, n=22)
727 Points -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
719 Points -2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
717 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
698 Points -5%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4703 (3529.2min - 4703.12max) Points +72%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4100 (3846.15min - 4100.04max) Points +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3089 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
2967 (2663.47min - 2966.92max) Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
2854 Points +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2739 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2061 - 3100, n=23)
2713 Points -1%
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
299 Points +8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
289 Points +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
278 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
273 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (211 - 297, n=23)
272 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
233 Points -16%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (166 - 268, n=21)
200 Seconds * -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
199.8 Seconds * -7%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
186 Seconds *
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
169 Seconds * +9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
136 Seconds * +27%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
123 Seconds * +34%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105001 MIPS +53%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
104616 MIPS +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)
76978 MIPS +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
76344 MIPS +11%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
71321 MIPS +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
68491 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (45045 - 79032, n=22)
67692 MIPS -1%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
6972 MIPS +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6866 MIPS +6%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6458 MIPS
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
6391 MIPS -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
6125 MIPS -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)
6122 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3665 - 6600, n=22)
6079 MIPS -6%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
19012 Points +45%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
18475 Points +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)
13567 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
13239 Points +1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
13072 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (9094 - 15410, n=22)
12803 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
12766 Points -2%
Single-Core
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2058 Points +11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2001 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
1950 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1140 - 2043, n=22)
1909 Points +3%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
1861 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
1829 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=231, last 2 years)
1808 Points -3%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
27 fps +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26.2 fps +39%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
21.5 fps +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)
21.2 fps +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
19.7 fps +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
18.9 fps
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (14.7 - 22.3, n=22)
18.9 fps 0%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
54.6 s * -24%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
51.4 s * -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
49.2 s * -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (34.4 - 82.8, n=22)
48.5 s * -10%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
44.2 s *
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
43.8 s * +1%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
34.4 s * +22%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.4699 sec * -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4498 sec * -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (0.4052 - 0.723, n=22)
0.4493 sec * -2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4412 sec *
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4182 sec * +5%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
0.4041 sec * +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4028 sec * +9%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2739 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
233 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
278 Points
Pomoc
Performance Rating
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
97.6 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
78.5 pt
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
68.4 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
23600 KRay/s +44%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
21332 KRay/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)
18585 KRay/s +13%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17934 KRay/s +9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17741 KRay/s +8%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16419 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6788 - 19557, n=22)
15528 KRay/s -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117390 Points +41%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
108001 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)
93302 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89277 Points +7%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83334 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81656 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (22551 - 95579, n=22)
77877 Points -7%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5888 MB/s +55%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
5264 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)
4316 MB/s +13%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4080 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3973 MB/s +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3809 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2491 - 4270, n=22)
3642 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
126758 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126217 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120299 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)
109168 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (65121 - 120936, n=22)
107083 Points +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105597 Points +1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
104502 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
13785 Points +33%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13440 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)
12175 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11232 Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11050 Points +7%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10361 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6108 - 11631, n=22)
9841 Points -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58716 Points +43%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
53398 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)
47772 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44368 Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44154 Points +8%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
40932 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (11283 - 48474, n=22)
38588 Points -6%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
141059 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111789 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)
107334 MB/s -24%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
105169 MB/s -25%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3691 - 149377, n=22)
84032 MB/s -40%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81504 MB/s -42%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81046 MB/s -43%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1689 MB/s +55%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1513 MB/s +39%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1254 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)
1208 MB/s +11%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1088 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (789 - 1254, n=22)
1066 MB/s -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1032 MB/s -5%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12891 KRay/s +44%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
11431 KRay/s +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)
10062 KRay/s +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9680 KRay/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9570 KRay/s +7%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8955 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3655 - 10716, n=22)
8424 KRay/s -6%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50609 MPixel/s +7%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47412 MPixel/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
46114 MPixel/s -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
43965 MPixel/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (10871 - 50488, n=22)
40521 MPixel/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)
36679 MPixel/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
23815 MPixel/s -50%

Wydajność systemu

Płynnie działającemu systemowi nie brakuje mocy obliczeniowej. Gry, renderowanie i edycja wideo należą do podstawowych kompetencji komputera. Szybkość transferu pamięci RAM jest na normalnym poziomie dla pamięci DDR5-5600 RAM.

Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dwukanałowym.
Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dwukanałowym.
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8538 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
8153 Points +2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8010 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5855 - 8538, n=8)
7664 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7580 Points -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
7329 Points -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
6883 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11940 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11329 Points -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11302 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (8835 - 11940, n=8)
10809 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)
10718 Points -10%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
10547 Points -12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10491 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10991 Points +5%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10425 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7967 - 10991, n=8)
9840 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9735 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)
9716 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
9376 Points -10%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
9030 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13562 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
13370 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7738 - 13575, n=8)
11549 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)
11450 Points +2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11204 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10860 Points -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
9291 Points -17%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2050 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1974 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1970 Points +1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1955 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=168, last 2 years)
1877 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1104 - 1974, n=7)
1815 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1789 Points -8%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
1919 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1914 Points +2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1884 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1812 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=168, last 2 years)
1787 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1058 - 1914, n=7)
1720 Points -9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1705 Points -10%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2353 Points +16%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2316 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2084 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=168, last 2 years)
2042 Points +1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2028 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1178 - 2254, n=7)
1982 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1936 Points -5%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1952 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1839 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=168, last 2 years)
1700 Points -13%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
1651 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1037 - 1952, n=7)
1650 Points -15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1635 Points -16%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1557 Points -20%
PCMark 10 Score
8010 pkt.
Pomoc
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77103 MB/s +10%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70102 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69289 MB/s -1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
68474 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (37448 - 74486, n=22)
62955 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)
59222 MB/s -16%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
37448 MB/s -47%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84131 MB/s +12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
75581 MB/s 0%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75433 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73950 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (41599 - 75433, n=22)
63423 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)
63097 MB/s -16%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41599 MB/s -45%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76244 MB/s +6%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72225 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71464 MB/s -1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67649 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (36152 - 88505, n=22)
66548 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)
61557 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
36152 MB/s -50%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (82.3 - 102.3, n=22)
90.2 ns * -4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
89.9 ns * -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 ns * -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.6 ns * -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)
87.3 ns * -0%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.1 ns *
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.2 ns * +4%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienie DPC

Standardowy test monitora opóźnień (surfowanie po sieci, odtwarzanie wideo 4k, wysokie obciążenie Prime95) ujawnił pewne anomalie. System nie wydaje się być odpowiedni do edycji wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą doprowadzić do poprawy lub nawet pogorszenia wydajności.

Monitor opóźnienia
Monitor opóźnienia
Monitor opóźnienia
Monitor opóźnienia
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
18226.8 μs * -881%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10410.4 μs * -460%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2472 μs * -33%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1857.6 μs *
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1518 μs * +18%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Urządzenia pamięci masowej

Pro 16 może pomieścić łącznie dwa dyski SSD PCIe 4 w formacie M.2-2280. Obsługiwany jest RAID-0/1. Dysk SSD Samsung (1 TB, PCIe 4, M.2-2280) w naszym urządzeniu testowym zapewnił doskonałe prędkości transferu. Pozytywne: Nie wystąpił throttling termiczny.

Laptop może pomieścić dwa dyski SSD.
Laptop może pomieścić dwa dyski SSD.
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7122 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6782 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1011 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 730.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3528 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4879 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 78.14 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 327.7 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
91.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.3 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
80.2 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
75.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
66.5 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
59.6 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
42.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4414 (4394.81min - 4413.86max) MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=197, last 2 years)
3539 MB/s +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3349 (938.07min - 3349.15max) MB/s +6%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2809 - 4234, n=10)
3326 MB/s +5%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3157 (2968.73min - 3157.45max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3023 (3010.73min - 3023.25max) MB/s -4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2353 (2142.12min - 2352.79max) MB/s -25%
seq write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3637 - 5842, n=10)
4956 MB/s +5%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4698 (3640.45min - 4697.66max) MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4485 (775.32min - 4484.81max) MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4306 (4280.74min - 4306.08max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=197, last 2 years)
3828 MB/s -19%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3152 (3026.22min - 3152.01max) MB/s -33%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2252 (2149.48min - 2252.34max) MB/s -52%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (7029 - 7148, n=10)
7112 MB/s 0%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7090 (6633.87min - 7089.84max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6899 (5306.42min - 6899.46max) MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6659 (5729.63min - 6659.09max) MB/s -6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6460 (6020.84min - 6459.94max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=197, last 2 years)
6385 MB/s -10%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
3974 (3600.81min - 3974.33max) MB/s -44%
seq q8 t1 write
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6770 (6323.06min - 6770.24max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6887, n=10)
6763 MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5716 (5661.68min - 5716.31max) MB/s -16%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5007 (4969.96min - 5007.21max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=197, last 2 years)
4807 MB/s -29%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4803 (4344.79min - 4802.73max) MB/s -29%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2934 (2895.62min - 2933.5max) MB/s -57%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
94.1 (93.93min - 94.12max) MB/s +70%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 84.5, n=10)
75 MB/s +36%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
67.9 (64.79min - 67.93max) MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=197, last 2 years)
67.9 MB/s +23%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
56.3 (55.9min - 56.3max) MB/s +2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
55.3 (53.37min - 55.32max) MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
54.4 (50.25min - 54.39max) MB/s -2%
4k q1 t1 write
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
343 (338.95min - 343.03max) MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
253 (250.9min - 252.85max) MB/s -26%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
252 (249.53min - 252.23max) MB/s -27%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (146.3 - 343, n=10)
246 MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=197, last 2 years)
224 MB/s -35%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
174.5 (172.12min - 174.51max) MB/s -49%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
127 (124.67min - 127.01max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 read
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4923 (4891.68min - 4922.98max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4040 (4013.9min - 4040.16max) MB/s -18%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4923, n=10)
3211 MB/s -35%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3013 (755.04min - 3013.06max) MB/s -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=197, last 2 years)
2586 MB/s -47%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
932 (919.54min - 932.39max) MB/s -81%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
906 (859.8min - 906.06max) MB/s -82%
4k q32 t16 write
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4394 (3486.17min - 4394.19max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3555 (3527.21min - 3555.07max) MB/s -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2736 (1172min - 2736.15max) MB/s -38%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=10)
2639 MB/s -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=197, last 2 years)
2154 MB/s -51%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
554 (543.86min - 553.56max) MB/s -87%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
501 (456.23min - 501.33max) MB/s -89%
AS SSD
Score Total
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10265 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8690 Points -15%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10265, n=10)
8362 Points -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
7774 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=185, last 2 years)
6828 Points -33%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6291 Points -39%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
3959 Points -61%
Score Read
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4721 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3300 Points -30%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=10)
3001 Points -36%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2959 Points -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=185, last 2 years)
2502 Points -47%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1523 Points -68%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
1215 Points -74%
Score Write
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4652 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4064 Points -13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4684, n=10)