Recenzja Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41: Niedrogi laptop do gier z RTX 4050 i długim czasem pracy

Trwałość. Ryzen 5 7535HS, GeForce RTX 4050, USB 4 i jasny wyświetlacz 16:10 (16 cali, WUXGA, 165 Hz, G-Sync) to najważniejsze cechy stosunkowo niedrogiego (1250 euro) Nitro 16. W odpowiednich warunkach i tak już bardzo dobry czas pracy na baterii poprzednika został jeszcze bardziej przekroczony. Niniejsza recenzja ocenia wydajność i inne cechy tej alternatywnej konfiguracji.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (tłumaczenie DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 13/08/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Windows

Przy cenie nieco poniżej 1250 euro, obecna konfiguracja Acer Nitro 16 należy do laptopów gamingowych z niższego segmentu cenowego. Nasza jednostka Nitro 16 jest zasilana przez AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS APU i procesor Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU.

Konkurencja obejmuje urządzenia takie jak Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS, Schenker XMG Focus 15 (E23), Gigabyte G7 KE, Asus TUF A15 FA507oraz Medion Erazer Scout E20.

Informacje o obudowie, wyposażeniu i urządzeniach wejściowych można znaleźć w naszej recenzji identycznie zbudowanego siostrzanego modeluktóry jest wyposażony w Ryzen 7 7735HS i kartę graficzną RTX 4070 GPU.

Test device courtesy of Nvidia DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE (Nitro 16 Rodzina)

Procesor

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS 6 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 100 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt R

Karta grafiki

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 2355 MHz, pamięć: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3623, Optimus

Pamięć

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Matryca

16.00 cali 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pikseli 142 PPI, AU Optronics B160UAN01.Q, IPS, refleksująca: nie, 165 Hz

Chipset

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Dysk twardy

SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, 512 GB

, 426 GB wolne miejsce

Karta dźwiękowa

Realtek ALC245 @ AMD K19.4

Złącza

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: Headset combined port, czytnik kart: MicroSD, TPM 2.0

Łączność

Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1

Gabaryty

wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 27.9 x 360.1 x 279.9

Akumulator

90 Wh, 5850 mAh litowo-jonowy

System operacyjny

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

kamerka: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Inne

głośniki: Stereo, klawiatura: Chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji

Waga

2.56 kg, zasilacz: 620 g

Cena

1399 Euro

Odnośniki

Acer strona producenta
Acer sekcja

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

pełna specyfikacja

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.7 %	08/2023	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	27.9 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
86.9 %	06/2023	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	2.2 kg	22.1 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
85.1 %	07/2023	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	26.9 mm	15.60"	2569x1440
83.3 %	01/2023	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	25 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.3 %	06/2023	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83 %	05/2023	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	29 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Porównanie rozmiarów

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Gigabyte G7 KE Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Asus TUF A15 FA507 Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS DIN A4 ❌

Lewa strona: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 2.0 (USB-A), czytnik kart pamięci (MicroSD), audio combo

Prawa strona: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), gniazdo na blokadę kabla

Tył: Port zasilania, HDMI 2.1, USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=91, last 2 years)	95 MB/s +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	84 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.3 MB/s -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=92, last 2 years)	118.7 MB/s +36%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	89.98 MB/s +3%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	89 MB/s +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	87.5 MB/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	87 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1636 (1591^min - 1674^max) MBit/s +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1491 (1391^min - 1562^max) MBit/s
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1476 (1278^min - 1551^max) MBit/s -1%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=54)	1288 MBit/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=153, last 2 years)	1229 MBit/s -18%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921	985 (902^min - 1065^max) MBit/s -34%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	941 (465^min - 984^max) MBit/s -37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	776 (392^min - 802^max) MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1744 (1670^min - 1770^max) MBit/s +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1685 (1180^min - 1751^max) MBit/s
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1655 (1627^min - 1681^max) MBit/s -2%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (707 - 1775, n=54)	1407 MBit/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=154, last 2 years)	1374 MBit/s -18%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	957 (480^min - 968^max) MBit/s -43%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921	917 (797^min - 933^max) MBit/s -46%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	905 (765^min - 969^max) MBit/s -46%

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1491 (1391-1562)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø763 (392-802)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (465-984)

Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1636 (1591-1674)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (902-1065)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1476 (1278-1551)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1470-1802)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1684 (1180-1751)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (765-969)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø940 (480-968)

Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1627-1681)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (797-933)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1744 (1670-1770)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1725 (1685-1740)

ColorChecker Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE: 14.18 ∆E min: 0.59 - max: 20.56 ∆E

Wyświetlacz - panel 16:10 z pokryciem sRGB

Do zalet matowego, 16-calowego ekranu IPS o rozdzielczości 1920 x 1200 pikseli i formacie 16:10 należy obsługa technologii G-Sync, brak migotania PWM oraz krótki czas reakcji. Jasność i kontrast panelu 165 Hz spełniają odpowiednie cele (odpowiednio > 300 cd/m² i 1000:1).

Nie ma zbyt wielu różnic w porównaniu z panelem WQXGA (2560 x 1600 pikseli) siostrzanego modelu siostrzanego modeluchoć ten ostatni oferuje wyższą maksymalną jasność (prawie 500 cd/m²).


387 cd/m²	381 cd/m²	378 cd/m²
381 cd/m²	415 cd/m²	388 cd/m²
358 cd/m²	378 cd/m²	350 cd/m²

podświetlenie ekranu

AU Optronics B160UAN01.Q tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

maksimum: 415 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 379.6 cd/m² Minimum: 24 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 84 %
na akumulatorze: 415 cd/m²
kontrast: 1153:1 (czerń: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94, calibrated: 2.68
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
77.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.182

Download Plik ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AU Optronics B160UAN01.Q, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) BOE0AD1, IPS, 2569x1440, 15.6"	Gigabyte G7 KE AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Medion Erazer Scout E20 LG Philips LGD0611, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		-8%	12%	-6%	-12%	-12%	-8%
Display P3 Coverage	80	69.3 -13%	98.6 23%	70.4 -12%	64.9 -19%	65.1 -19%	67.9 -15%
sRGB Coverage	99.4	97.3 -2%	99.9 1%	99.8 0%	96.5 -3%	96.7 -3%	99.1 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	77.4	70.7 -9%	86.3 11%	71.7 -7%	66.6 -14%	66.5 -14%	69.9 -10%
Response Times		-66%	-81%	-3%	-236%	-66%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	11.2 ?(5.3, 5.9)	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3) -39%	15.6 ?(7.4, 8.2) -39%	5 ?(2.1, 2.9) 55%	30.4 ?(14.8, 15.6) -171%	14.8 ?(7.2, 7.6) -32%	11 ?(5, 6) 2%
Response Time Black / White *	5.2 ?(1.9, 3.3)	10 ?(5.7, 4.3) -92%	11.6 ?(5.8, 5.8) -123%	8.3 ?(4.2, 4.1) -60%	20.8 ?(11.7, 9.1) -300%	10.4 ?(5.4, 5) -100%	5 ?(2, 3) 4%
PWM Frequency
Screen		25%	-2%	28%	28%	14%	27%
Brightness middle	415	301 -27%	302 -27%	307 -26%	288 -31%	312 -25%	520 25%
Brightness	380	294 -23%	278 -27%	301 -21%	271 -29%	303 -20%	494 30%
Brightness Distribution	84	94 12%	85 1%	93 11%	91 8%	91 8%	91 8%
Black Level *	0.36	0.21 42%	0.36 -0%	0.2 44%	0.17 53%	0.25 31%	0.39 -8%
Contrast	1153	1433 24%	839 -27%	1535 33%	1694 47%	1248 8%	1333 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.71	1.79 62%	2.24 52%	1.32 72%	1.9 60%	2.65 44%	1.94 59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.98	3.48 50%	5.52 21%	4.6 34%	3.3 53%	6.44 8%	5.62 19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.68	1.2 55%		1.03 62%	0.9 66%	0.96 64%	0.74 72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.6	2.5 31%	3.87 -8%	2.1 42%	2.7 25%	3.2 11%	2.94 18%
Gamma	2.182 ^101%	2.265 ^97%	2.42 ^91%	2.247 ^98%	2.32 ^95%	2.246 ^98%	2.37 ^93%
CCT	7153 ^91%	6157 ^106%	6936 ^94%	6815 ^95%	6535 ^99%	7258 ^90%	6443 ^101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-16% / 5%	-24% / -11%	6% / 16%	-73% / -18%	-21% / -3%	7% / 16%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Ekran wykazuje przyzwoite odwzorowanie kolorów fabrycznie - z odchyleniem około 4,7, cel (DeltaE < 3) nie jest dokładnie dopasowany. Kalibracja zmniejsza odchylenie do 2,68 i zapewnia bardziej zrównoważone poziomy szarości. Panel może całkowicie odtworzyć gamę kolorów sRGB, ale nie przestrzenie kolorów Adobe RGB i Display P3.

Ma to miejsce w przypadku panelu WQXGA w konfiguracji oinnym wariancie Nitro 16, a także ekranów większości konkurentów. Tylko wyświetlacz XMG Focus 15 oferuje dobre pokrycie DCI-P3.

CalMAN: Nasycenie kolorów (skalibrowane)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.9 ms rise
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.3 ms rise
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17204 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Panel IPS oferuje stabilne kąty widzenia, które można odczytać z dowolnej pozycji. Jasność panelu jest wystarczająca do czytelności na zewnątrz, jeśli słońce nie świeci zbyt mocno.

Wydajność: Acer skupia się na Rembrandcie i Adzie Lovelace

Seria Nitro 16 łączy układy GPU Ada-Lovelace z procesorami Intel lub AMD. Obecny model opiera się na AMD i jest dostępny za około 1250 euro (~ 1500 USD). Jest to więc obecnie najtańszy przedstawiciel tej serii.

Warunki testowe

Spośród sześciu trybów wydajności specyficznych dla producenta (patrz tabela poniżej) wykorzystano tryby "Balanced" (do testów porównawczych) i "Eco" (do testów baterii). tryby "Turbo" i "Performance" są dostępne tylko przy zasilaniu sieciowym (poziom naładowania baterii > 30%). Przycisk nad klawiaturą umożliwia przełączanie między trybami. Alternatywnie można to zrobić za pomocą oprogramowania NitroSense (centrum sterowania laptopa). Dioda LED wskazuje aktywny tryb.

Uwaga: Podczas gdy model other Nitro 16 był testowany z aktywnym trybem Optimus, tryb dGPU (= iGPU jest wyłączone) jest używany na bieżącym urządzeniu testowym. Testy baterii są jednak wyjątkiem. Dlatego wyniki benchmarków nie zawsze są bezpośrednio porównywalne.

	Turbo	Power	Balanced	Quiet	Balanced (bateria)	Eco (bateria)
PowerLimit 1 (HWInfo)	95 Watt	75 Watt	65 Watt	45 Watt	25 Watt	25 Watt
Limit mocy 2(HWInfo)	100 Watt	100 Watt	100 Watt	100 Watt	25 Watt	25 Watt
Wydajność (Witcher 3 )	~84 fps	~83 fps	~82 fps	~74 fps	-	-
Hałas (Witcher 3 )	61 dB(A)	56 dB(A)	45 dB(A)	35 dB(A)	-	-

Procesor

Ryzen Ryzen 5 7535HSaPU (Zen 3+, Rembrandt-R) oferuje sześć rdzeni CPU z łącznie 12 wątkami przy maksymalnym taktowaniu pojedynczego rdzenia wynoszącym 4,55 GHz. Procesor potwierdza stałe obciążenie wielowątkowe (CB15 Loop) ze stale wysokim taktowaniem Turbo - niezależnie od wybranego trybu pracy systemu. Różnice pomiędzy poszczególnymi trybami są niewielkie.

Nic dziwnego, że APU Ryzen 7 z siostrzanego modelu oferuje większą wydajność wielowątkową - w końcu ma 8 rdzeni CPU. Pod względem wydajności jednowątkowej, która jest bardziej istotna w codziennym użytkowaniu, APU są niemal na równi.

Cinebench R15 multi-core loop

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS: Ø1686 (1633.32-1757.16)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3594 (3477.05-4085.8)

Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2150 (2119.99-2197.32)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2219 (2188.66-2273.89)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2149 (1980.2-2683.11)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2303 (2287.15-2328.15)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	83.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	76.8 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	71.8 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	67 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	60.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	58.4 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	58.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	51.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	44.1 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	24270 Points +123%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=201, last 2 years)	21405 Points +96%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16907 Points +55%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	15718 Points +44%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	14232 Points +31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14131 Points +30%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	13750 Points +26%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	10900 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (6016 - 10900, n=2)	8458 Points -22%
Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1935 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=199, last 2 years)	1871 Points +26%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	1849 Points +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1791 Points +20%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1701 Points +14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1488 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1309 - 1488, n=2)	1399 Points -6%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	9152 Points +117%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=199, last 2 years)	8140 Points +93%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6571 Points +56%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	6051 Points +43%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5502 Points +30%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5368 Points +27%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5354 Points +27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	4224 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (2394 - 4224, n=2)	3309 Points -22%
CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	742 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 855, n=199, last 2 years)	720 Points +24%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	717 Points +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	702 Points +21%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	654 Points +13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	603 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	601 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	581 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (503 - 581, n=2)	542 Points -7%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	4086 (3477.05^min - 4085.8^max) Points +133%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=205, last 2 years)	3360 Points +91%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	2683 Points +53%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2666.7 Points +52%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2328 Points +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2274 (2188.66^min - 2273.89^max) Points +29%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	2197 Points +25%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1757 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1457 - 1757, n=2)	1607 Points -9%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	283 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=202, last 2 years)	276 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	270 Points +12%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	269 Points +12%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	250 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	249 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	247 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	241 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (232 - 241, n=2)	237 Points -2%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (286 - 467, n=2)	377 Seconds * -32%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	286 Seconds *
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	225 Seconds * +21%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	223 Seconds * +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	219 Seconds * +23%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	213 Seconds * +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	189 Seconds * +34%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=194, last 2 years)	173.3 Seconds * +39%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	135 Seconds * +53%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	99191 MIPS +104%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=198, last 2 years)	83604 MIPS +72%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70081 MIPS +44%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	63399 MIPS +30%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	61191 MIPS +26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	60612 MIPS +25%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	53712 MIPS +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	48646 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (32332 - 48646, n=2)	40489 MIPS -17%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6621 MIPS +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	6367 MIPS +12%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=198, last 2 years)	6261 MIPS +10%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	6004 MIPS +6%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5786 MIPS +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	5670 MIPS
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5584 MIPS -2%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5563 MIPS -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (4954 - 5670, n=2)	5312 MIPS -6%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	18308 Points +133%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=200, last 2 years)	14689 Points +87%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	12423 Points +58%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12111 Points +54%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	10284 Points +31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9683 Points +23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9346 Points +19%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	7852 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (5928 - 7852, n=2)	6890 Points -12%
Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2032 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=200, last 2 years)	1873 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	1813 Points +21%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1683 Points +12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1555 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1507 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1502 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1383 - 1502, n=2)	1443 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1345 Points -10%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	25 fps +76%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=198, last 2 years)	23.1 fps +63%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.8 fps +46%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.5 fps +23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.4 fps +23%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	16.9 fps +19%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	16.6 fps +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	14.2 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (8.49 - 14.2, n=2)	11.3 fps -20%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	53.4 s * -16%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (46.2 - 57, n=2)	51.6 s * -12%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50.6 s * -10%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=195, last 2 years)	47.8 s * -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	46.2 s *
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	45.5 s * +2%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	44.9 s * +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	41.7 s * +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	39.5 s * +15%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (0.503 - 0.557, n=2)	0.53 sec * -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	0.503 sec *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4964 sec * +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4958 sec * +1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	0.4748 sec * +6%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4451 sec * +12%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=199, last 2 years)	0.4409 sec * +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4345 sec * +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4253 sec * +15%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

37321

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

14167

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6257

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

20.14 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

102.32 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.79 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

241 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

151.1 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1757 Points

Pomoc

... porównanie

Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	90.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	88.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	84.4 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69.3 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66.6 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	61.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59.5 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	58.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	48.4 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	28033 KRay/s +117%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=195, last 2 years)	21348 KRay/s +65%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	20615 KRay/s +59%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17161 KRay/s +33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	16315 KRay/s +26%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	14305 KRay/s +11%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	13017 KRay/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12945 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (7938 - 12945, n=2)	10442 KRay/s -19%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	122098 Points +54%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	108878 Points +37%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105483 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=195, last 2 years)	105180 Points +33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102221 Points +29%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	79252 Points
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71043 Points -10%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	65572 Points -17%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (51482 - 79252, n=2)	65367 Points -18%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	5324 MB/s +99%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=195, last 2 years)	4798 MB/s +79%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	4566 MB/s +70%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3492 MB/s +30%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3421 MB/s +28%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3236 MB/s +21%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3233 MB/s +21%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2679 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1777 - 2679, n=2)	2228 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	134897 Points +63%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	124433 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=195, last 2 years)	115732 Points +40%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	108729 Points +32%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	106626 Points +29%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103991 Points +26%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82540 Points
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80285 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (64018 - 82540, n=2)	73279 Points -11%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	15380 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	13789 Points +41%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13097 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=195, last 2 years)	13057 Points +33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12579 Points +29%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9786 Points
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9408 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (8070 - 9786, n=2)	8928 Points -9%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	7390 Points -24%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	63432 Points +46%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58232 Points +34%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	55524 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=195, last 2 years)	53023 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	51986 Points +20%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	43495 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (27660 - 43495, n=2)	35578 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	35141 Points -19%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	32002 Points -26%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	110707 MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=195, last 2 years)	109650 MB/s +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	105083 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102731 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	86309 MB/s -18%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (31227 - 105083, n=2)	68155 MB/s -35%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67010 MB/s -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66447 MB/s -37%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	55915 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1587 MB/s +139%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=195, last 2 years)	1334 MB/s +101%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	1089 MB/s +64%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	961 MB/s +45%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	921 MB/s +38%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	906 MB/s +36%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	665 MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	651 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (461 - 665, n=2)	563 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	15209 KRay/s +120%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=195, last 2 years)	11500 KRay/s +67%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	11242 KRay/s +63%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9094 KRay/s +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8556 KRay/s +24%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	7630 KRay/s +11%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	6932 KRay/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	6899 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (4193 - 6899, n=2)	5546 KRay/s -20%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	50110 MPixel/s +74%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=196, last 2 years)	39447 MPixel/s +37%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	37944 MPixel/s +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	29922 MPixel/s +4%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	29206 MPixel/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28865 MPixel/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28318 MPixel/s -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27554 MPixel/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (20908 - 28865, n=2)	24887 MPixel/s -14%

Wydajność systemu

Płynnie działający system zapewnia wystarczającą moc obliczeniową dla wymagających aplikacji, takich jak rendering, edycja wideo i gry. Prędkości transferów pamięci roboczej (DDR5-4800) pozostają poniżej potencjału, gdyż porównanie z wartościami z modelu Asus TUF Gaming A16 pokazuje.

Pamięć robocza działa w trybie dwukanałowym.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7927 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=175, last 2 years)	7754 Points +16%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	7556 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7220 Points +8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7210 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6926 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	6690 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	6690 Points 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6126 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	11207 Points +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10844 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=174, last 2 years)	10825 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10579 Points +9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10573 Points +9%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10301 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	9736 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	9736 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9726 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10505 Points +29%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=174, last 2 years)	9874 Points +21%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9836 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9674 Points +18%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	9313 Points +14%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9146 Points +12%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9038 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	8167 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	8167 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=174, last 2 years)	11951 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	11868 Points +16%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	10622 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10558 Points +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10333 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	10219 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	10219 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9585 Points -6%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6703 Points -34%

CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2114 Points +42%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1937 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=159, last 2 years)	1890 Points +27%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1824 Points +22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1774 Points +19%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1550 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1535 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1489 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1489 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1949 Points +30%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1857 Points +24%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1804 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=159, last 2 years)	1794 Points +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1715 Points +15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1517 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1508 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1494 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1494 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2384 Points +55%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=159, last 2 years)	2071 Points +35%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2023 Points +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1990 Points +29%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1800 Points +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1709 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1637 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1538 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1538 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1966 Points +46%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1929 Points +44%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1878 Points +40%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=159, last 2 years)	1693 Points +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1388 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1342 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1342 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1337 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1231 Points -8%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5548 pkt.
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5810 pkt.
PCMark 10 Score		6690 pkt.
Pomoc

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77899 MB/s +61%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=195, last 2 years)	64044 MB/s +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	59712 MB/s +23%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59079 MB/s +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48529 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (48452 - 48529, n=2)	48491 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48432 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47903 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44994 MB/s -7%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	84974 MB/s +69%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=195, last 2 years)	67798 MB/s +35%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67235 MB/s +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	61609 MB/s +23%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	50259 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50111 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	49994 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	47559 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (39833 - 50259, n=2)	45046 MB/s -10%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76412 MB/s +39%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	72541 MB/s +32%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=195, last 2 years)	65776 MB/s +20%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59900 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54997 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54982 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54955 MB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (51255 - 54982, n=2)	53119 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46966 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	98.7 ns * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (87.7 - 106.5, n=2)	97.1 ns * -11%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=195, last 2 years)	93.8 ns * -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.5 ns * -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	90.4 ns * -3%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	89.8 ns * -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	87.7 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	85 ns * +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 ns * +6%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienie DPC

Standardowy test monitora opóźnień (surfowanie po Internecie, odtwarzanie wideo 4k, duże FFT w Prime95) nie wykazał żadnych nieprawidłowości. System wydaje się być odpowiedni do edycji wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą doprowadzić do poprawy lub nawet pogorszenia wydajności.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2504.7 μs * -239%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2463.6 μs * -234%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1969.3 μs * -167%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1312.1 μs * -78%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1128.7 μs * -53%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	738.5 μs *

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Pamięć masowa

Acer wyposaża Nitro 16 w dysk SSD o pojemności 512 GB (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) firmy SK Hynix. Zapewnia on dobrą szybkość transmisji danych, ale nie należy do najbardziej wydajnych modeli SSD. Negatywnym aspektem jest to, że spadki wydajności występują z powodu dławienia termicznego. Notebook posiada miejsce na drugi dysk SSD PCIe Gen 4.