Recenzja laptopa Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16: Pełna moc w grach dzięki RTX 4090

Ten Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H jest nie tylko jednym z najmocniejszych, ale także jednym z najdroższych notebooków do gier. Obecnie trzeba zapłacić co najmniej 4500 euro za kombinację Core i9-13900HX, GeForce RTX 4090, 32 GB pamięci RAM (2x 16 GB DDR5-5600), 2 TB pamięci masowej (2x 1 TB NVMe SSD) i wyświetlacz 240 Hz (2660 x 1600 pikseli). Każdy gracz musi zdecydować, czy chce wspierać obecną politykę cenową producenta, która wydaje się być niezwiązana z jakąkolwiek inflacją.
Konkurentami Legion Pro 7 są inne high-endowe monitory dla graczy z RTX 4090 z serii 16- i 17-calowych, takie jak Razer Blade 16i XMG Neo 16asus Strix Scar 17 Asus Strix Scar 17 i MSI Titan GT77. Tańszy model siostrzany z RTX 4080 również pojawia się w tabelach jako urządzenie porównawcze.
Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.8 % | 06/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.8 % | 03/2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
88.3 % | 04/2023 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
87.7 % | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 29.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | ||
89 % | 02/2023 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.5 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
89.4 % | 02/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
Ponieważ konstrukcja obudowy jest identyczna z już testowanym wariantem, nie będziemy ponownie wchodzić w szczegóły dotyczące obudowy, portów i urządzeń wejściowych w tym artykule. Odpowiednie informacje można znaleźć w podlinkowanej recenzji.
Komunikacja
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (942 - 1622, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1780, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (872 - 1714, n=23) | |
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
Kamera internetowa

Wyświetlacz
Oprócz obudowy, wyświetlacz jest również identyczny z wersją 4080. To świetna wiadomość, ponieważ nasz ostatni test potwierdził, że ekran WQXGA jest imponujący w prawie każdym aspekcie.
|
rozświetlenie: 91 %
na akumulatorze: 491 cd/m²
kontrast: 1228:1 (czerń: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 0.97
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
71.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.211
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 AUO B160ZAN01.U, mini-LED, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 BOE0AF0 NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 24% | 20% | -3% | 22% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.5 | 99.9 44% | 98 41% | 67.3 -3% | 94.9 37% | 69.1 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 96.7 -3% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.6 | 90.9 27% | 85.6 20% | 68.9 -4% | 92.4 29% | 71.2 -1% |
Response Times | -622% | -53% | -60% | -365% | -21% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 10.9 ? | 10.2 ? 6% | 6.2 ? 43% | 14.5 ? -33% | 38.4 ? -252% | 12.3 ? -13% |
Response Time Black / White * | 4.6 ? | 62.04 ? -1249% | 11.4 ? -148% | 8.6 ? -87% | 26.6 ? -478% | 5.9 ? -28% |
PWM Frequency | 2420 ? | 2380 ? | ||||
Screen | 1412% | 11% | -5% | 54786% | 21% | |
Brightness middle | 491 | 730 49% | 322.5 -34% | 372 -24% | 606 23% | 511 4% |
Brightness | 472 | 729 54% | 317 -33% | 349 -26% | 602 28% | 469 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 94 3% | 86 -5% | 88 -3% | 93 2% | 86 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.0045 99% | 0.29 27% | 0.32 20% | 0.0001 100% | 0.4 -0% |
Contrast | 1228 | 162222 13110% | 1112 -9% | 1163 -5% | 6060000 493385% | 1278 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 5.65 -253% | 1.15 28% | 2.06 -29% | 4.8 -200% | 0.95 41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.15 | 10.11 -96% | 3.03 41% | 3 42% | 8.2 -59% | 2.07 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.97 | 1.85 -91% | 0.56 42% | 1.5 -55% | 1.8 -86% | 0.91 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 8.1 -170% | 1.7 43% | 1.9 37% | 6.5 -117% | 0.6 80% |
Gamma | 2.211 100% | 1.98 111% | 2.27 97% | 2.312 95% | 2.63 84% | 2.176 101% |
CCT | 6979 93% | 5874 111% | 6299 103% | 6747 96% | 6596 99% | 6545 99% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 271% /
824% | -7% /
4% | -23% /
-12% | 18148% /
35172% | -0% /
10% |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
Niezależnie od jasności (~470 cd/m²), kontrastu (~1 230:1) czy dokładności odwzorowania kolorów (średnia DeltaE 1,6): Zmierzone wartości oddają więcej niż sprawiedliwość panelowi IPS. Czas reakcji jest również przyjemny, nie tylko dzięki częstotliwości odświeżania 240 Hz. Jest miejsce na poprawę w przestrzeni kolorów. Chociaż 100% sRGB jest wystarczające dla notebooka do gier, około 72% pokrycia AdobeRGB i 70% DCI-P3 są nieco słabe dla profesjonalnych użytkowników. Inni konkurenci zapewniają tutaj więcej (patrz tabela).
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
4.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.1 ms rise | |
↘ 5.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18694 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Wydajność
Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H to absolutnie najwyższa liga pod względem ceny i wydajności. Ten 16-calowy laptop oferuje wystarczające rezerwy, aby być dobrze przygotowanym na nowe gry w nadchodzących latach. Podczas gdy procesor i karta graficzna są lutowane (co jest typowe dla nowoczesnych laptopów), pamięć robocza i pamięć masowa mogą zostać wymienione w razie potrzeby.
Warunki testowe
Wstępnie załadowane oprogramowanie Lenovo Vantage zawiera wiele opcji dostosowywania systemu. Szczególnie istotne są tryb Heat i opcjonalny tryb Hybrid. Z wyjątkiem pomiarów baterii (Balanced z przełączaniem grafiki), wszystkie nasze testy zostały przeprowadzone w trybie Performance ze stale aktywnym dGPU.
Tryb cichy | Tryb zrównoważony | Tryb wydajności | |
CPU PL1 (HWiNFO) | 55 W | 80 W | 130 W |
CPU PL2 (HWiNFO) | 65 W | 119 W | 185 W |
Hałas (Witcher 3 @FHD/Ultra) | ~37 dB(A) | ~47 dB(A) | ~53 dB(A) |
Wydajność (Witcher 3 @FHD/Ultra) | 40 FPS (zablokowane) | ~160 FPS | ~200 FPS |
Procesor
Zgodnie z oczekiwaniami Core i9-13900HX zapewnia bardzo podobną wydajność do modelu RTX 4080. Wydajność układu Raptor Lake jest również dość stała w dłuższych okresach (patrz pętla Cinebench). Ogólnie rzecz biorąc, procesor osiąga wyniki nieco powyżej ustalonej do tej pory średniej 13900HX. Intel łączy 8 wydajnych rdzeni z Hyper-Threading i 16 wydajnych rdzeni bez HT, co oznacza łącznie 32 równoległe wątki.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming |
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=22) | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Single Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=19) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=235, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=235, last 2 years) | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=235, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=241, last 2 years) | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=240, last 2 years) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=232, last 2 years) | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=233, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=21) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=239, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=236, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=231, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 60169, n=229, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 252486, n=229, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=229, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=229, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=229, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 134044, n=229, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 328679, n=229, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=229, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 31796, n=229, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 60161, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
Wydajność systemu
Moc systemu również stoi na bardzo wysokim poziomie: 8 158 punktów w PCMark 10 to wynik o kilka procent wyższy od rezultatu modelu RTX 4080. Wyniki benchmarków pamięci roboczej DDR5 są również imponujące w porównaniu.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (7690 - 9331, n=8) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10972 - 11983, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9038 - 11680, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10605 - 16395, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1825 - 2295, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2295, n=160, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1666 - 2166, n=8) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2166, n=160, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2162 - 2514, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=160, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1441 - 2275, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2275, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
PCMark 10 Score | 8158 pkt. | |
Pomoc |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 88014, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 89096, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 103259, n=229, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 136.8, n=226, last 2 years) |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
Opóźnienia DPC
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
Pamięć masowa
Zamiast instalować większy dysk SSD, Lenovo po prostu wykorzystuje dwa dyski SSD o pojemności 1 TB z tańszego modelu Legion, które w całości zajmują sloty M.2. Popularny Samsung PM9A1 osiąga bardzo dobre wyniki, ale często musi radzić sobie z silniejszymi wahaniami lub spadkami podczas dłuższych okresów obciążenia - jak w przypadku Pro 7. Zjawisko to dotyczy jednak również dysków SSD NVMe innych producentów (patrz wykres).
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 |
AS SSD | |
Score Total | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2577 - 9147, n=75) | |
Average of class Gaming (1923 - 10783, n=186, last 2 years) | |