Recenzja laptopa Asus ROG Zephyrus M16: Dobrze dopracowany pakiet do gier

Kiedy bóg wiatru gra w gry. Dzięki procesorowi Core i9-12900H, RTX 3070 Ti i pamięci RAM DDR5, Zephyrus M16 zawiera trochę potężnego sprzętu. Nasz obszerny test pokazuje, czy ten laptop do gier jest jeszcze w stanie zaimponować pod koniec generacji Alder Lake i RTX 30xx.

Christian Hintze (tłumaczenie DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 18/02/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

M16 (2022) GU603zw dziedziczy po swoim poprzedniku o tej samej nazwie, wzbogacając pakiet o wydajny procesor i9 Alder Lake i RTX 3070 Ti. Wszystko to mieści się w dość smukłej i kompaktowej 16-calowej obudowie z wyświetlaczem 16:10 (2 560 x 1 500 pikseli), która ledwie omija naszą listę najlepszych mobilnych laptopów do gier, ponieważ waży tylko 75 gramów (~2,6 oz) za dużo (>2 kg = 4,4 lb). Byłoby to pierwsze 16-calowe urządzenie w zestawieniu.

Ponieważ 16-calowe laptopy do gier z wyświetlaczem 16:10 to wciąż mniejszość, w naszym porównaniu uwzględniamy także "konwencjonalne" urządzenia 16:9 z podobnym sprzętem. Opróczpoprzednika, są to w szczególności.Schenker Vision 16 ProorazLenovo Legion 5 Pro, ale także Schenker XMG Focus 16oraz Corsair Voyager a1600.

Test device courtesy of Asus

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z

Procesor

Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P

Karta grafiki

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 120 W TDP ( including 20 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 528.24, MUX Switch + Optimus

Pamięć

32 GB

, 1x 16 GB Samsung DDR5-4800 plus 1x 16 GB soldered

Matryca

16.00 cali 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pikseli 189 PPI, BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, refleksująca: nie, HDR, 165 Hz

Chipset

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Dysk twardy

Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, 1024 GB

, 960 GB wolne miejsce

Karta dźwiękowa

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Złącza

3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: headset port, czytnik kart: MicroSD

Łączność

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2

Gabaryty

wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 19.9 x 355 x 243

Akumulator

90 Wh litowo-jonowy, 90WHrs, 4S1P, 4-cell Li-ion

System operacyjny

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

kamerka: 720P HD IR camera for Windows Hello
Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Inne

głośniki: 2x 2W stereo speakers, klawiatura: Backlit chiclet keyboard with single-zone RGB, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji

Waga

2.075 kg, zasilacz: 761 g

Cena

3000 Euro

Odnośniki

Asus strona producenta
Asus sekcja

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

pełna specyfikacja

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.8 %	02/2023	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.6 %		Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.8 %	11/2022	Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1.7 kg	17.1 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.7 %	10/2022	Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	26.6 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87 %	01/2023	Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	24.3 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.6 %	12/2022	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	2.4 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

Obudowa - Slim 16-calowego laptopa do gier

Ponieważ w sprawie nie zmieniło się praktycznie nic, odsyłamy do naszego testu M16 z 2021 r, w którym znajdują się szczegółowe opisy obudowy, opcji serwisowych oraz urządzeń wejściowych.

Porównanie wielkości

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Corsair Voyager a1600 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti DIN A4 ❌

Urządzenia łączące - HDMI 2.1 i Thunderbolt 4

Po lewej: AC, HDMI 2.1 TMDS, GigabitLAN, USB-A 3.2 Gen2, USB-C/Thunderbolt 4 (w tym DP i PD), USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (w tym DP i PD), port słuchawkowy

Prawidłowo: USB-A 3.2 Gen2, czytnik kart microSD, Kensington Lock

Czytnik kart SD

Czytnik kart SC jest ograniczony do kart microSD, ale przynajmniej nasz AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 mieści się zgrabnie, nie wystając. W porównaniu do poprzednika, który już dobrze się spisywał, prędkość jest ponownie nieco zwiększona.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	138.1 (127.28^min - 140.64^max) MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (18.5 - 209, n=89, last 2 years)	105.4 MB/s ∼76% -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	96 MB/s ∼70% -30%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.86 MB/s ∼61% -39%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)	78.2 MB/s ∼57% -43%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	77 (59.03^min - 141.54^max) MB/s ∼56% -44%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	261.31 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	187 MB/s ∼72% -28%
Average of class Gaming (20.5 - 269, n=79, last 2 years)	129.7 MB/s ∼50% -50%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	89.78 MB/s ∼34% -66%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	86.79 MB/s ∼33% -67%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)	82.5 MB/s ∼32% -68%

Komunikacja

Asus zastosował moduł Intel AX211, który obsługuje również sieć 6-Ghz. W porównaniu z modułem MediaTek z poprzednika, prędkości transferu znacznie wzrastają. Wydajność jest bardzo stała.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1875 (859^min - 1931^max) MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1596 (1559^min - 1632^max) MBit/s ∼85%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1569 (594^min - 1673^max) MBit/s ∼84% -2%
Average of class Gaming (980 - 1875, n=31, last 2 years)	1514 MBit/s ∼81% -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616	1483 (1373^min - 1637^max) MBit/s ∼79% -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (891 - 1851, n=81)	1411 MBit/s ∼75% -12%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1780 (896^min - 1840^max) MBit/s ∼100% +32%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1576 (1508^min, 1508^P1 - 1653^max) MBit/s ∼89% +17%
Average of class Gaming (740 - 1780, n=64, last 2 years)	1378 MBit/s ∼77% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1347 (1002^min - 1458^max) MBit/s ∼76%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (629 - 1861, n=54)	1337 MBit/s ∼75% -1%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1655 (1550^min - 1681^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1637 (829^min - 1653^max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616	1576 (1546^min - 1644^max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (886 - 1857, n=33, last 2 years)	1554 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (883 - 1857, n=81)	1516 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	886 (444^min - 941^max) MBit/s ∼54% -46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1694 (1645^min, 1645.58^P1 - 1715^max) MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1619 (1564^min - 1655^max) MBit/s ∼96%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (839 - 1890, n=54)	1462 MBit/s ∼86% -10%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=71, last 2 years)	1459 MBit/s ∼86% -10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	852 (425^min - 931^max) MBit/s ∼50% -47%

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1373-1637)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1575 (1546-1644)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (470-602)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø697 (360-761)

Kamera internetowa

ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z: 19.46 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 29.53 ∆E

Wyświetlacz - 16 cali o rozdzielczości QHD+ i częstotliwości 165 Hz

Mimo że dzieli z poprzednikiem tę samą podstawową specyfikację (16 cali, IPS, 16:10, 2 560 x 1 600, 165 Hz), Asus stosuje teraz inny panel. Zamiast korzystać z panelu od AU Optronics, tym razem pochodzi on od BOE. Co prawda panel jest nawet nieco jaśniejszy (481 nitów), ale rozkład jasności jest bardziej nierównomierny, a jasność znacznie spada zwłaszcza w kierunku lewego dolnego rogu. Dzięki znacznie poprawionej wartości czerni, pozytywnie wzrasta wartość kontrastu.

Czasy reakcji są stosunkowo szybkie, choć poprzednik reagował tu jeszcze szybciej. PWM nie jest wykorzystywany do regulacji jasności, a pewien lekki bleeding ekranu jest widoczny tylko w ciemnych scenach.

Ziarniste subpiksele z powodu matowej nakładki


498 cd/m²	534 cd/m²	527 cd/m²
464 cd/m²	497 cd/m²	483 cd/m²
436 cd/m²	449 cd/m²	441 cd/m²

podświetlenie ekranu

BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3)

X-Rite i1Pro 3

maksimum: 534 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 481 cd/m² Minimum: 28.4 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 82 %
na akumulatorze: 484 cd/m²
kontrast: 2367:1 (czerń: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.53 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 3.53
ΔE Greyscale 1.74 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
83.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download Plik ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H AU Optronics AUOC199, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti N160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) BOE NE16oQDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Corsair Voyager a1600 BOE0A3B, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display			-15%	-15%	-14%	-14%
Display P3 Coverage	92.8		68.7 -26%	67.3 -27%	68.3 -26%	68.7 -26%
sRGB Coverage	98.5		96.7 -2%	96.1 -2%	96.6 -2%	98.2 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	83.1		70 -16%	69.5 -16%	70.6 -15%	70.1 -16%
Response Times		39%	-37%	-51%	-62%	-36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)	4.8 ?(2, 2.8) 37%	14.3 ?(6.8, 7.5) -88%	14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) -89%	16.4 ?(7.4, 9) -116%	13 ?(7, 6) -71%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(4.6, 5.4)	6 ?(2, 4) 40%	8.6 ?(3.9, 4.7) 14%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) -12%	10.8 ?(5, 5.8) -8%	10 ?(5, 5) -0%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-28%	-34%	-11%	-40%	-21%
Brightness middle	497	448 -10%	364 -27%	522.8 5%	460 -7%	355 -29%
Brightness	481	446 -7%	347 -28%	503 5%	442 -8%	340 -29%
Brightness Distribution	82	86 5%	89 9%	84 2%	89 9%	91 11%
Black Level *	0.21	0.48 -129%	0.3 -43%	0.41 -95%	0.32 -52%	0.53 -152%
Contrast	2367	933 -61%	1213 -49%	1275 -46%	1438 -39%	670 -72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.53	2.76 22%	3.3 7%	2.47 30%	3.65 -3%	2.43 31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.15	7.09 -15%	6.6 -7%	6.56 -7%	7.49 -22%	4.31 30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.53	2.86 19%	2.5 29%	0.61 83%	3.65 -3%	1.14 68%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.74	3.1 -78%	5.2 -199%	3 -72%	5.87 -237%	2.62 -51%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.153 ^102%	2.14 ^103%	2.27 ^97%	2.42 ^91%	2.28 ^96%
CCT	6418 ^101%	6826 ^95%	6331 ^103%	6719 ^97%	6711 ^97%	6909 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		87
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		100
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / -16%	-29% / -30%	-26% / -17%	-39% / -38%	-24% / -22%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Asus reklamuje 100% pokrycie przestrzeni barw DCI-P3, ale mierzymy "tylko" 92,8%. Przestrzeń barw AdobeRGB jest jeszcze pokryta w 83%. Przynajmniej na polu testowym naszych wybranych konkurentów skutkuje to wciąż najwyższą pozycją. Ogólnie rzecz biorąc, wyświetlacz nadaje się również do profesjonalnej edycji zdjęć i filmów.

W stanie dostawy panel jest już dobrze skalibrowany. Przy wartości zaledwie 1,74, wartość DeltaE skali szarości jest szczególnie niska. W programie ColorChecker nasze narzędzie Portrait Display Calman Color Calibration mierzy nieco wyższe odchylenia. Dodatkowa kalibracja nie poprawia tych wartości, a raczej psuje i tak już bardzo dobrą skalę szarości.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.6 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.4 ms rise
7.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19232 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Pomimo dobrej jasności wyświetlacza, nadal należy unikać bezpośredniego światła słonecznego na zewnątrz i upewnić się, że patrzysz na ekran prosto z przodu, ponieważ w przeciwnym razie widoczność szybko spada.

Zawartość wyświetlacza można łatwo odczytać nawet pod skrajnymi kątami widzenia. W przypadku patrzenia na ekran z boku jasność jest niższa niż w przypadku patrzenia z góry lub z dołu.

Wydajność - 120-watowy RTX 3070-Ti nieco poniżej średniej

ROG Zephyrus jest dostępny w różnych konfiguracjach sprzętowych. Model M16 ma być wkrótce dostępny także z procesorem Intela 13. generacji i RTX 40xx, natomiast nasz testowy egzemplarz nadal korzysta z m.in.Core i9-12900HorazRTX 3070 Ti.

Ewentualnie możliwe jest niemal wszystko, począwszy od.RTX 3050 Tiaż do RTX 3080 Ti. Jeśli chodzi o procesor, to obecnie masz do wyboru m.in i7-12700Ha naszym topowym modelem. Wyposażenie uzupełnia 32 GB pamięci RAM, ale i tutaj dostępne są liczne opcje.

Warunki badania

Oprogramowanie Asus Armoury Crate pozwala na dostosowanie różnych ustawień w laptopie, więc użytkownik powinien się z nim zapoznać. Oferuje ono opcje wyszukiwania aktualizacji urządzenia, wyboru kolorowych i dynamicznych tapet Aura, czy też kontroli wydajności.

Producent oferuje trzy tryby wydajności (Quiet, Performance i Turbo), a także daje możliwość kontrolowania wydajności za pomocą trybów wydajności systemu Windows lub nawet samodzielnego ustawienia kilku limitów mocy w trybie ręcznym - opcji, których brakuje u wielu innych producentów.

3 tryby wydajności plus Windows plus tryb ręczny

Jako że w trybie Turbo laptop jest już bardzo głośny w czasie bezczynności, wszystkie benchmarki uruchamiamy w trybie "Performance". Tryb "Quiet" jest wykorzystywany tylko do testów akumulatora - nie ma osobnego trybu oszczędzania energii.

Choć samo oprogramowanie jest dobrze zorganizowane, różne błędy w tłumaczeniu czy niekompletne zdania (w niemieckiej wersji językowej) wciąż uniemożliwiają dobre ogólne wrażenie.

Dynamiczna tapeta: Tutaj lewa strona jest jaśniejsza, a później niebieski po prawej stronie

Błąd w tłumaczeniu: Niepełne zdanie (w wersji niemieckiej)

Kolejne niekompletne (niemieckie) zdanie

Procesor

Asus zapowiedział już model M16 z Intel Gen13. Dopóki nie będzie to dostępne, obecnie wciąż używamy Intel Core i9-12900Hw naszej jednostce testowej. Ten high-endowy procesor oferuje 6 rdzeni Performance i 8 Efficiency. Rdzenie Performance mają taktowanie do 5 GHz, a podstawowe taktowanie rdzeni Efficiency wynosi 1,8 GHz. Ponieważ tylko rdzenie P obsługują hyperthreading, otrzymujemy łącznie 12 wątków.

W pętli Cinebench stała wydajność jest bardzo stabilna, a maksymalne TDP sięga około 84 W w trybie Performance. Wydajność proc.i7-12700H w bardzo wydajnymXMG Focus 16okazuje się na początku nawet nieco lepsza. Jednak po 4. biegu najpóźniej jego wydajność spada poniżej wydajności naszego M16, który pokonuje także m.in.Ryzen 7 6800 wLegion 5.

Przy okazji, zamiast 84 W, w trybie Turbo do dyspozycji jest potężne 99 W! Podczas pracy na baterii jest to tylko około 40 W, przy czym wydajność odpowiednio spada.

We wszystkich testach 2022 M16 jest o około 20% szybszy od poprzednika z procesoremi9-11900H.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2351 (2324.37-2366.02)

Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2440 (2338.36-2692.88)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	82.2 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	80 pt ∼80%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	79.8 pt ∼80%
Average of class Gaming	72.8 pt ∼73%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	72.3 pt ∼72%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	71.6 pt ∼72%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	68.2 pt ∼68%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H ^-2! Intel Core i9-11900H	65.6 pt ∼66%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	17378 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7647 - 19648, n=22)	15902 Points ∼92% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	15870 Points ∼91%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=229, last 2 years)	15500 Points ∼89% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	14660 (14400.8^min - 14660.4^max) Points ∼84% -8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	13445 Points ∼77% -15%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	12979 Points ∼75% -18%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1871 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1698 - 1921, n=22)	1838 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	1802 Points ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	1775 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=226, last 2 years)	1639 Points ∼88% -12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1554 Points ∼83% -17%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1543 Points ∼82% -18%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	6358 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6053 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2922 - 7471, n=22)	5985 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13457, n=231, last 2 years)	5813 Points ∼91% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5661 Points ∼89% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	5160 Points ∼81% -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5152 Points ∼81% -15%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	4994 Points ∼79% -17%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	715 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (653 - 738, n=22)	712 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	699 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	689 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=231, last 2 years)	631 Points ∼88% -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	603 Points ∼84% -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	599 Points ∼84% -16%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	596 Points ∼83% -17%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	2756 (2001.6^min - 2029.74^max) Points ∼100% +7%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	2030 (2001.6^min - 2029.74^max) Points ∼74% -22%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	2693 (2338.36^min - 2692.88^max) Points ∼98% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	2586 (2431.02^min - 2585.82^max) Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1561 - 3077, n=22)	2578 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5554, n=236, last 2 years)	2476 Points ∼90% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2366 (2324.37^min - 2366.02^max) Points ∼86% -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	2211 (1875.21^min - 2210.56^max) Points ∼80% -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2161 Points ∼78% -16%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (243 - 277, n=23)	264 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	263 Points ∼100%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	256 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	248 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=232, last 2 years)	247 Points ∼94% -6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	245 Points ∼93% -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	236 Points ∼89% -10%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Seconds * ∼100% -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	243 Seconds * ∼93% -25%
Average of class Gaming (93 - 1259, n=233, last 2 years)	243 Seconds * ∼93% -25%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	227 Seconds * ∼87% -16%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 415, n=22)	215 Seconds * ∼82% -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	213 Seconds * ∼82% -9%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	211 Seconds * ∼81% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	195 Seconds * ∼75%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	66057 MIPS ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	64817 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	64403 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (37614 - 76677, n=22)	63631 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 135927, n=228, last 2 years)	62825 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	62024 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	54156 MIPS ∼82% -18%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	51281 MIPS ∼78% -22%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6192 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=22)	5869 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	5858 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5805 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5803 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	5764 MIPS ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7332, n=229, last 2 years)	5733 MIPS ∼93% -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	5582 MIPS ∼90% -10%

Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	12753 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=23)	12461 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	12058 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 21853, n=227, last 2 years)	11011 Points ∼86% -14%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	10846 Points ∼85% -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	10355 Points ∼81% -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10040 Points ∼79% -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	9663 Points ∼76% -24%

Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1841 Points ∼100%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	1821 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1647 - 1892, n=23)	1815 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	1737 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=227, last 2 years)	1649 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	1624 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1566 Points ∼85% -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1481 Points ∼80% -20%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	18.9 fps ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	18.5 fps ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (9.16 - 22.5, n=22)	18.1 fps ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	18 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 34.8, n=233, last 2 years)	17.5 fps ∼93% -7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	16.8 fps ∼89% -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	15 fps ∼79% -21%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	13.8 fps ∼73% -27%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.2 s * ∼100% -36%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	52.8 s * ∼92% -25%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=229, last 2 years)	51.3 s * ∼90% -22%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	44.1 s * ∼77% -5%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	43.3 s * ∼76% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (38 - 59.8, n=22)	43.3 s * ∼76% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	42.2 s * ∼74%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	40.5 s * ∼71% +4%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	0.544 sec * ∼100% -25%
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)	0.514 sec * ∼94% -18%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	0.4897 sec * ∼90% -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.4894 sec * ∼90% -12%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4685 sec * ∼86% -8%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4582 sec * ∼84% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.503, n=22)	0.4486 sec * ∼82% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4352 sec * ∼80%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2586 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

276 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

263 Points

Pomoc

... porównanie

Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.3 pt ∼94%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	90.8 pt ∼91%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	86.3 pt ∼86%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	81.9 pt ∼82%
Average of class Gaming	80.2 pt ∼80%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	72.6 pt ∼73%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	70.4 pt ∼70%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H ^-9! Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 pt ∼0%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	17031 KRay/s ∼100% +11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	15798 KRay/s ∼93% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	15387 KRay/s ∼90%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	15068 KRay/s ∼88% -2%
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 52479, n=201, last 2 years)	14057 KRay/s ∼83% -9%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12459 KRay/s ∼73% -19%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=22)	11115 KRay/s ∼65% -28%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105987 Points ∼100% +41%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	99931 Points ∼94% +33%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	81613 Points ∼77% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	74919 Points ∼71%
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 227882, n=201, last 2 years)	74869 Points ∼71% 0%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	62698 Points ∼59% -16%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=22)	54800 Points ∼52% -27%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3902 MB/s ∼100% +10%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3634 MB/s ∼93% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3545 MB/s ∼91%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 8525, n=201, last 2 years)	3523 MB/s ∼90% -1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	3410 MB/s ∼87% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=22)	3158 MB/s ∼81% -11%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2895 MB/s ∼74% -18%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106322 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105420 Points ∼99%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	105203 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78668 - 111241, n=22)	103601 Points ∼97% -2%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	102320 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 180473, n=201, last 2 years)	99113 Points ∼93% -6%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	89788 Points ∼84% -15%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	13039 Points ∼100% +37%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12842 Points ∼98% +35%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 29598, n=201, last 2 years)	10891 Points ∼84% +14%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9727 Points ∼75% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9538 Points ∼73%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=22)	9371 Points ∼72% -2%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8476 Points ∼65% -11%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58327 Points ∼100% +60%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	54778 Points ∼94% +50%
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 118401, n=201, last 2 years)	40181 Points ∼69% +10%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	38369 Points ∼66% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36496 Points ∼63%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	31038 Points ∼53% -15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=22)	28698 Points ∼49% -21%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	137383 MB/s ∼100% +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	135448 MB/s ∼99% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	128492 MB/s ∼94%
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 236139, n=201, last 2 years)	103986 MB/s ∼76% -19%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=22)	90046 MB/s ∼66% -30%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	76636 MB/s ∼56% -40%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61160 MB/s ∼45% -52%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	1116 MB/s ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	993 MB/s ∼89%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=22)	974 MB/s ∼87% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	901 MB/s ∼81% -9%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2090, n=222, last 2 years)	892 MB/s ∼80% -10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	866 MB/s ∼78% -13%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	835 MB/s ∼75% -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s ∼0% -100%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8856 KRay/s ∼100% +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	8438 KRay/s ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8316 KRay/s ∼94%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	8034 KRay/s ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 28105, n=201, last 2 years)	7638 KRay/s ∼86% -8%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	6644 KRay/s ∼75% -20%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=22)	6214 KRay/s ∼70% -25%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42660 MPixel/s ∼100% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42574 MPixel/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=23)	36969 MPixel/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 51096, n=202, last 2 years)	30230 MPixel/s ∼71% -29%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	30182 MPixel/s ∼71% -29%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	30047 MPixel/s ∼70% -29%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	29687 MPixel/s ∼70% -30%

Wydajność systemu

W PCMark, połączenie i9 i RTX 3070 Tiwysuwa się na prowadzenie we wszystkich benchmarkach, ale i tego poziomu wydajności można się spodziewać. To samo dotyczy benchmarków CrossMark.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7871 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6)	7712 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7549 Points ∼96% -4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7208 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=189, last 2 years)	7171 Points ∼91% -9%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7134 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7097 Points ∼90% -10%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10936 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6)	10807 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10544 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10472 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12639, n=188, last 2 years)	10375 Points ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	10150 Points ∼93% -7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9970 Points ∼91% -9%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10187 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6)	10153 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9929 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9479 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=188, last 2 years)	9351 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9113 Points ∼89% -11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8983 Points ∼88% -12%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11881 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11759 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6)	11364 Points ∼96% -4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11350 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=188, last 2 years)	10364 Points ∼87% -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10097 Points ∼85% -15%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9777 Points ∼82% -18%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1884 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6)	1871 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2195, n=98, last 2 years)	1828 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1657 Points ∼88% -12%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1648 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1643 Points ∼87% -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1415 Points ∼75% -25%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1797 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6)	1784 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2062, n=98, last 2 years)	1753 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1600 Points ∼89% -11%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1592 Points ∼89% -11%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1582 Points ∼88% -12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1379 Points ∼77% -23%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2004 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6)	2004 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=98, last 2 years)	1963 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1829 Points ∼91% -9%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1816 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1746 Points ∼87% -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1599 Points ∼80% -20%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1803 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6)	1759 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2230, n=98, last 2 years)	1687 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1481 Points ∼82% -18%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1419 Points ∼79% -21%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1363 Points ∼76% -24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1060 Points ∼59% -41%

PCMark 10 Score		7871 pkt.
Pomoc

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63157 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63102 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=22)	58799 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	51182 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 78835, n=201, last 2 years)	51133 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	49972 MB/s ∼79% -21%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44959 MB/s ∼71% -29%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	67051 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66149 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=22)	61346 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 86294, n=201, last 2 years)	54879 MB/s ∼82% -18%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	51778 MB/s ∼77% -23%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	51270 MB/s ∼76% -24%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46043 MB/s ∼69% -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66275 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	65336 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 66275, n=22)	58343 MB/s ∼88% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55307 MB/s ∼83% -17%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	55214 MB/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 80441, n=201, last 2 years)	52065 MB/s ∼79% -21%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	48054 MB/s ∼73% -27%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	95.2 ns * ∼100% -8%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	92.5 ns * ∼97% -5%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	91.2 ns * ∼96% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88 ns * ∼92%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	87.1 ns * ∼91% +1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (88 - 118.1, n=21)	85 ns * ∼89% +3%
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 135.3, n=222, last 2 years)	69.9 ns * ∼73% +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienia DPC

LatencyMon niestety znajduje już pierwsze latencje podczas uruchamiania programu, nawet jeśli nie ma żadnych dodatkowych akcji. Podczas otwierania przeglądarki z wieloma zakładkami latencje jeszcze bardziej rosną.

Nasz film 4K/60-fps z YouTube również nie jest odtwarzany bez żadnych zrzuconych klatek (6). Wartości opóźnień nie są jednak ogólnie szczególnie wysokie i są niższe niż w przypadku XMG Focus 16, na przykład. Z drugiej strony stają się one widoczne wcześniej.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1994.6 μs * ∼100% -111%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	960 μs * ∼48% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	945.7 μs * ∼47%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	776 μs * ∼39% +18%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	773 μs * ∼39% +18%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	747.7 μs * ∼37% +21%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Rozwiązanie w zakresie przechowywania

W naszym modelu testowym zastosowano dysk SSD PCIe Gen4 firmy Micron o pojemności 1 TB. W naszym liście najlepszych dysków SSD, plasuje się on na pozycji 74, więc jest też wiele szybszych modeli. Benchmarki potwierdzają przyzwoite wartości dla rozwiązania pamięci masowej. Zmierzone wartości pamięci masowej Samsunga w poprzedniku czy np Legion 5, są szybsze.

Dysk SSD nie jest w stanie utrzymać swojej wydajności na dłuższą metę, ale spadek wydajności jest tylko niewielki.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6585 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4887 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 724 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 579 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 247 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2360 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2313 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	88.1 pt ∼88%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	88 pt ∼88%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	80.1 pt ∼80%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	79.7 pt ∼80%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	70.1 pt ∼70%
Average of class Gaming	67.3 pt ∼67%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	62.6 pt ∼63%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	62.3 pt ∼62%

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4229 (4208.75^min - 4229.47^max) MB/s ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4101 (4091.33^min - 4100.54^max) MB/s ∼97% +9%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3788 (3770.05^min - 3788.09^max) MB/s ∼90% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3764 (3540.2^min - 3763.76^max) MB/s ∼89%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3664 (3617.8^min - 3664.36^max) MB/s ∼87% -3%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1306 - 4343, n=19)	3297 MB/s ∼78% -12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3207 (3148.45^min - 3206.84^max) MB/s ∼76% -15%
Average of class Gaming (834 - 5676, n=187, last 2 years)	3098 MB/s ∼73% -18%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4767 (4365.51^min - 4766.62^max) MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4158 (4130.89^min - 4157.81^max) MB/s ∼87% -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4030 (4011.22^min - 4030.01^max) MB/s ∼85% -15%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (2416 - 4954, n=19)	3789 MB/s ∼79% -21%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3481 (3471.23^min - 3481.48^max) MB/s ∼73% -27%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3377 (3301.76^min - 3376.79^max) MB/s ∼71% -29%
Average of class Gaming (399 - 7889, n=186, last 2 years)	3291 MB/s ∼69% -31%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2974 (2933.08^min - 2974.1^max) MB/s ∼62% -38%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7090 (6255.18^min - 7089.92^max) MB/s ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6861 (5902.16^min - 6860.74^max) MB/s ∼97% +5%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6789 (5989.89^min - 6788.74^max) MB/s ∼96% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6593 (6284.75^min - 6592.61^max) MB/s ∼93% +1%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (6207 - 6734, n=19)	6564 MB/s ∼93% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6550 (5497.59^min - 6549.73^max) MB/s ∼92%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6099 (5570.64^min - 6098.73^max) MB/s ∼86% -7%
Average of class Gaming (1620 - 13195, n=187, last 2 years)	5378 MB/s ∼76% -18%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5216 (5094.91^min - 5216.3^max) MB/s ∼100% +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5048 (5040.92^min - 5048.44^max) MB/s ∼97% +4%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5033 (5015.97^min - 5032.74^max) MB/s ∼96% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4969 (4945.26^min - 4969.12^max) MB/s ∼95% +2%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4939 (4914.28^min - 4939.19^max) MB/s ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4876 (4374.87^min - 4876.3^max) MB/s ∼93%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (4543 - 4991, n=19)	4820 MB/s ∼92% -1%
Average of class Gaming (86.2 - 10261, n=187, last 2 years)	4029 MB/s ∼77% -17%
4k q1 t1 read
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	81.1 (79.64^min - 81.05^max) MB/s ∼100% +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	79.8 (79.31^min - 79.75^max) MB/s ∼98% +7%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	75 (74.44^min - 75.02^max) MB/s ∼92% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.3 (71.59^min - 74.33^max) MB/s ∼92%
Average of class Gaming (23.3 - 97.4, n=187, last 2 years)	64.9 MB/s ∼80% -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	59.4 (59.37^min - 59.41^max) MB/s ∼73% -20%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (39.2 - 74.3, n=19)	59.2 MB/s ∼73% -20%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	58.6 (57.33^min - 58.61^max) MB/s ∼72% -21%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	264 (263.57^min - 264.44^max) MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=186, last 2 years)	203 MB/s ∼77% -23%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	194.2 (193.1^min - 194.16^max) MB/s ∼74% -26%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (125.8 - 273, n=19)	192.9 MB/s ∼73% -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	190 (189.88^min - 190.32^max) MB/s ∼72% -28%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	156.4 (153.47^min - 156.39^max) MB/s ∼59% -41%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	140.8 (138.42^min - 140.84^max) MB/s ∼53% -47%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	138 (136.39^min - 138^max) MB/s ∼52% -48%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16AR

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit porównanie
HP Pavilion 11-n070eg x360 (min) N2820, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	46
...
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	2518
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2543
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2580
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2586
HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2590
MSI Crosshair 15 R6E B12UGZ-050 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2595
Acer Predator Orion 3000 PO3-640 i7-12700F, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	2610
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (max) R9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	6236