Notebookcheck Logo

Recenzja Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS: Laptop AMD z czasem pracy do 20 godzin

Biegacz długodystansowy. Asus wybrał sprzęt AMD - Ryzen 9 7940HS i Radeon RX 7600S - do zasilania laptopa do gier. Szybko reagujący ekran 16:10 o przekątnej 16 cali (WUXGA, 165 Hz, FreeSync) i doskonałe czasy pracy uzupełniają konfigurację.
AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook Radeon Ryzen (Zen) Windows Zen 4

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition - średniej klasy laptop do gier - opiera się na sprzęcie AMD: ARyzen-9-7940HSaPU iRadeon-RX-7600SgPU. Konkurenci to między innymiLenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8iMSI Katana 15 B12VEK, MedionMedion Erazer Defender P40i Gigabyte G5 KE.

Aby uzyskać bardziej szczegółowe informacje na temat obudowy laptopa, łączności i urządzeń wejściowych, zapoznaj się z naszą recenzją identycznie zbudowanego siostrzanego modelu A16 Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition w recenzji: Notebook AMD pod patronatem 7 .

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Procesor
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, 114 W PL2 / Short Burst, 105 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Karta grafiki
AMD Radeon RX 7600S - 8 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 2207 MHz, pamięć: 2000 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.14003.25002, MUX Switch, AMD Smart Access Graphic
Pamięć
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Matryca
16.00 cali 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pikseli 142 PPI, BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, FreeSync, refleksująca: nie, 165 Hz
Chipset
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Dysk twardy
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, 512 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 400 GB wolne miejsce
Karta dźwiękowa
Realtek ALC256
Złącza
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: Headset combined port, TPM 2.0
Łączność
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3
Gabaryty
wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 22.1 x 355 x 252
Akumulator
90 Wh, 5845 mAh litowo-polimerowy
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
System operacyjny
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
kamerka: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Inne
głośniki: Stereo, klawiatura: Chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji
Waga
2.184 kg, zasilacz: 548 g
Cena
1699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.9 %
06/2023
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
2.2 kg22.1 mm16.00"1920x1200
87.9 %
05/2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
82.9 %
03/2023
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.6 %
05/2023
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg33 mm17.30"2560x1440
81.8 %
04/2023
Gigabyte G5 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2 kg23.9 mm15.60"1920x1080

Obudowa i łączność - niewielkie zmiany w porównaniu do siostrzanego modelu

W porównaniu do siostrzanego modelua16 ma dwukolorową obudowę. Tył pokrywy i spód obudowy mają kolor piaskowy ("Sandstorm"). Opcje łączności są również nieco inne: Jeden z dwóch portów USB-C został ulepszony do standardu USB-4.

Porównanie wielkości

397 mm 264 mm 33 mm 2.9 kg363.4 mm 260.4 mm 26.8 mm 2.5 kg359 mm 259 mm 24.9 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 238 mm 23.9 mm 2 kg355 mm 252 mm 22.1 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
prawa strona USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
prawa strona USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
lewa strona: złącze zasilania, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), audio combo
lewa strona: złącze zasilania, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), audio combo
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1622 (823min - 1820max) MBit/s +109%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1529 (623min - 1608max) MBit/s +97%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1445 (1373min - 1515max) MBit/s +86%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=152, last 2 years)
1274 MBit/s +64%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
908 (806min - 973max) MBit/s +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
802 (579min - 1120max) MBit/s +3%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE
  (536 - 925, n=35)
786 MBit/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Realtek RTL8852BE
776 (392min - 802max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1734 (1706min - 1750max) MBit/s +92%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1686 (1451min - 1716max) MBit/s +86%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1666 (840min - 1685max) MBit/s +84%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=158, last 2 years)
1405 MBit/s +55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1223 (1136min - 1272max) MBit/s +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Realtek RTL8852BE
905 (765min - 969max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
899 (755min - 936max) MBit/s -1%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE
  (455 - 984, n=36)
833 MBit/s -8%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø763 (392-802)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø802 (579-1120)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1509 (623-1608)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1373-1515)
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1595 (823-1820)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø908 (806-973)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (765-969)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1223 (1136-1272)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (840-1685)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1733 (1706-1750)
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1685 (1451-1716)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (755-936)
ColorChecker
16.3 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS: 15.99 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.28 ∆E

Wyświetlacz - panel 16:10 z pokryciem sRGB

Subpiksele
Subpiksele

A16 jest wyposażony w ten sam panel 165 Hz, który można znaleźć w jego siostrzanym modelu siostrzanym modelu. Jego matowy 16-calowy wyświetlacz (1920 x 1200 pikseli, IPS) ma format 16:10 i zdobywa punkty dzięki obsłudze FreeSync, braku migotania PWM i szybkiej reakcji. Kontrast jest akceptowalny, ale jasność mogłaby być nieco lepsza.

292
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
podświetlenie ekranu
BOE NE160WUM-NX2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
maksimum: 303 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 94 %
na akumulatorze: 301 cd/m²
kontrast: 1433:1 (czerń: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.265
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Medion Erazer Defender P40
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Gigabyte G5 KE
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16.00
Display
3%
-44%
-0%
-39%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
69.3
71.2
3%
38.1
-45%
68.3
-1%
40.7
-41%
69.4
0%
sRGB Coverage
97.3
98.8
2%
56.8
-42%
98.1
1%
61
-37%
97.8
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.7
73.3
4%
39.3
-44%
69.8
-1%
42.1
-40%
70.9
0%
Response Times
2%
-159%
10%
-79%
-5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3)
14.5 ?(7, 7.5)
7%
38.8 ?(18.6, 20.2)
-149%
14.6 ?(7.1, 7.5)
6%
26.64 ?(12.52, 14.12)
-71%
17 ?(8, 9)
-9%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(5.7, 4.3)
10.4 ?(5.7, 4.7)
-4%
26.8 ?(14.2, 12.6)
-168%
8.7 ?(3.6, 5.1)
13%
18.65 ?(10.83, 7.82)
-87%
10.1 ?(5.4, 4.7)
-1%
PWM Frequency
Screen
5%
-115%
7%
-113%
4%
Brightness middle
301
405.7
35%
261
-13%
364
21%
269
-11%
308
2%
Brightness
294
368
25%
258
-12%
343
17%
248
-16%
293
0%
Brightness Distribution
94
87
-7%
92
-2%
86
-9%
85
-10%
90
-4%
Black Level *
0.21
0.38
-81%
0.19
10%
0.28
-33%
0.5
-138%
0.23
-10%
Contrast
1433
1068
-25%
1374
-4%
1300
-9%
538
-62%
1339
-7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.79
1.65
8%
5.57
-211%
1.67
7%
4.54
-154%
1.47
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.48
4.2
-21%
20.6
-492%
2.78
20%
17.28
-397%
2.98
14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.2
0.53
56%
4.63
-286%
1.14
5%
3.34
-178%
1.02
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
1.2
52%
3.19
-28%
1.4
44%
3.8
-52%
2.2
12%
Gamma
2.265 97%
2.3 96%
2.45 90%
2.091 105%
2.17 101%
2.228 99%
CCT
6157 106%
6453 101%
6146 106%
6568 99%
7408 88%
6228 104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 4%
-106% / -106%
6% / 6%
-77% / -92%
-0% / 2%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Ex działa, ekran ma dobre odwzorowanie kolorów: Odchylenie około 1,8 jest akceptowalne (DeltaE < 3). Kalibracja obniża ten wskaźnik do 1,2 i prowadzi do bardziej zrównoważonych odcieni szarości. Panel jest w stanie odwzorować całą przestrzeń kolorów sRGB, ale nie AdobeRGB i DCI P3. Jest to podobne do większości wyświetlaczy konkurencji.

CalMAN: Skala szarości
CalMAN: Skala szarości
CalMAN: Nasycenie
CalMAN: Nasycenie
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Skala szarości (skalibrowana)
CalMAN: Skala szarości (skalibrowana)
CalMAN: Nasycenie (skalibrowane)
CalMAN: Nasycenie (skalibrowane)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (skalibrowany)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (skalibrowany)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs sRGB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs sRGB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs AdobeRGB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs AdobeRGB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs DCI-P3
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.7 ms rise
↘ 4.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.3 ms rise
↘ 8.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Stabilny pod kątem widzenia panel IPS laptopa pozostaje czytelny pod każdym kątem. Możliwe jest oglądanie panelu na zewnątrz - o ile słońce nie świeci zbyt mocno.

A16 na zewnątrz.
A16 na zewnątrz.
kąty widzenia
kąty widzenia

Wydajność - Asus wykorzystuje moc AMD

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS to średniej klasy laptop do gier. Sprzęt AMD zapewnia niezbędną moc obliczeniową. Obecny model można nabyć za około 1700 dolarów.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 
 

Warunki testowania

Można przełączać się między trzema profilami wydajności specyficznymi dla producenta (patrz tabela) za pomocą kombinacji klawiszy "Fn" + "F5". Użyto profili "Wydajność" (benchmarki) i "Cichy" (testy baterii). Tryb GPU był ustawiony na "Standardowy" (= przełączanie grafiki). Centrum sterowania notebooka ("Armoury Crate") umożliwia tworzenie indywidualnych profili ("Manual"), które obejmują ustawienie krzywych PPT i wentylatora.

Turbo Wydajność Cisza
Limit mocy 1 (HWInfo) 120 watów 105 watów 75 watów
Limit mocy 2 (HWInfo) 144 waty 114 watów 90 watów
Hałas (Wichter 3) 53 dB(A) 51 dB(A) 46 dB(A)
Wydajność (Witcher 3) ~100 fps ~100 fps ~94 fps
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni
Skrzynia Zbrojowni

Procesor

Część procesoraRyzen-9-7940HS-APU (Phoenix, Zen 4) posiada osiem rdzeni obliczeniowych z 16 wątkami. Bazowa częstotliwość taktowania 4 GHz może zostać zwiększona do 5,25 GHz (jeden rdzeń). Zmierzone przez nas wyniki benchmarków są mniej więcej takie same, jak w przypadku wcześniej testowanych laptopów 7940HS. Użycie profilu "Turbo" prowadzi do nieco lepszej wydajności (4-5 procent).

Siostrzany model Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition w recenzji: Notebook AMD pod patronatem 7 Ryzen-7-7735HS-APU (Rembrandt R, Zen 3+) jest wyraźnie pokonany przez Ryzena 9, nawet przy tej samej liczbie rdzeni i tych samych limitach mocy. Dzięki lepszej architekturze i wyższym częstotliwościom taktowania, jego wydajność w przeliczeniu na wat jest wyższa.

Pokazuje to test pętli CB15: Ciągłe obciążenie wielowątkowe prowadzi procesor do pracy z niezmiennie wysokimi częstotliwościami taktowania turbo - niezależnie od wybranego profilu wydajności.

Uwaga: Szczegółowe informacje na temat zainstalowanego APU i jego architektury można przeczytać w naszym artykule analitycznymZen4.

wielowątkowy (podłączony do sieci)
wielowątkowy (podłączony do sieci)
jednowątkowy (podłączony do sieci)
jednowątkowy (podłączony do sieci)

Cinebench R15 multi continuous test

01653304956608259901155132014851650181519802145231024752640280529703135Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø3057 (3008.42-3230.23)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1968 (1876.44-2253.14)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2369 (2270.92-3189.19)
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2063 (1956.47-2112.49)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2250 (2235.89-2298.72)
Pętla CB15 (wydajność)
Pętla CB15 (wydajność)
Pętla CB15 (turbo)
Pętla CB15 (turbo)
Pętla CB15 (cicha)
Pętla CB15 (cicha)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
77.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
74.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
73.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
 
73.2 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
71.1 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
60.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
58.3 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
56.3 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
20341 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
19987 (10270.1min - 19987.3max) Points +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)
19692 Points +16%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (15556 - 18131, n=9)
16952 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
16907 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
15537 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
13995 Points -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
13155 Points -22%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)
1821 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1791 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (1733 - 1832, n=9)
1787 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
1697 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1668 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1666 Points -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
1629 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1561 Points -13%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
7710 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)
7486 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
6889 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (6277 - 7111, n=9)
6635 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6571 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
6009 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5441 Points -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
5066 Points -23%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
702 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (680 - 714, n=9)
701 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)
701 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
652 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
652 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
644 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
627 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
612 Points -13%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
3230 (3008.42min - 3230.23max) Points +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
3189 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=234, last 2 years)
3111 Points +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (2470 - 2848, n=9)
2687 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2666.7 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
2299 (2235.89min - 2298.72max) Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
2253 (1876.44min - 2253.14max) Points -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
2112 (1956.47min - 2112.49max) Points -21%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (277 - 288, n=9)
284 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
283 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=233, last 2 years)
269 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
265 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
248 Points -12%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
247 Points -13%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
245 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
243 Points -14%
Blender
v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
234 Seconds * -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
230 Seconds * -22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
225 Seconds * -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
198.4 Seconds * -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
198 Seconds * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (182 - 202, n=8)
190.4 Seconds * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
189 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
151 Seconds * +20%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H (3.3.3)
441 Seconds * -47%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H (3.3.2)
423 Seconds * -41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (3.3.3)
376 Seconds * -25%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX (3.3.3)
345 Seconds * -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=201, last 2 years)
314 Seconds * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (287 - 331, n=9)
307 Seconds * -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (3.3.3)
301 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX (3.3.3)
264 Seconds * +12%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
78076 MIPS +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)
77655 MIPS +11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
72220 MIPS +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (66408 - 73434, n=9)
70832 MIPS +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
70081 MIPS
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
61292 MIPS -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
59034 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
54380 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (6417 - 6776, n=9)
6643 MIPS 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6621 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)
6145 MIPS -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5779 MIPS -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
5718 MIPS -14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
5552 MIPS -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
5537 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
5383 MIPS -19%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
14222 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
14144 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)
13697 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12111 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (11207 - 12500, n=10)
11870 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
11198 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
10260 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9836 Points -19%
Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2032 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (1823 - 2032, n=10)
1982 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)
1815 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1777 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
1667 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1666 Points -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
1647 Points -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1574 Points -23%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
24.2 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)
21.4 fps +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (20.1 - 22.6, n=8)
21.1 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
20.8 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
20.8 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
17.5 fps -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
17.4 fps -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
16.6 fps -20%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
59.1 s * -42%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
57.7 s * -38%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
49.8 s * -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)
49.1 s * -18%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
47 s * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (36.9 - 54.8, n=9)
44.5 s * -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
41.7 s *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
36.5 s * +12%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
0.5 sec * -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
0.493 sec * -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
0.4904 sec * -15%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
0.4865 sec * -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
0.4769 sec * -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)
0.468 sec * -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (0.4159 - 0.4467, n=9)
0.4291 sec * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4253 sec *

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2666.7 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
188.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
283 Points
Pomoc
Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
 
95.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
92.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
85.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
82.3 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
72.1 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
69.2 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
64.7 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
61.1 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
28033 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (25226 - 29109, n=7)
27087 KRay/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
20413 KRay/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years)
18752 KRay/s -33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
16661 KRay/s -41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
15620 KRay/s -44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
15397 KRay/s -45%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
12542 KRay/s -55%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
122098 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (106512 - 123214, n=7)
115955 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
103903 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
101275 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years)
94075 Points -23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
77807 Points -36%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
76434 Points -37%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
65919 Points -46%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (4566 - 5119, n=7)
4874 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
4633 MB/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
4566 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years)
4359 MB/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
3494 MB/s -23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
3412 MB/s -25%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
3244 MB/s -29%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
3212 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
124433 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (118174 - 124783, n=7)
121397 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
113990 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
113837 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years)
109963 Points -12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
104709 Points -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
87225 Points -30%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
80337 Points -35%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
15380 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (14663 - 15551, n=7)
15170 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
13285 Points -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
12691 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years)
12237 Points -20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
10407 Points -32%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
8694 Points -43%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
7388 Points -52%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
63432 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (56839 - 66238, n=7)
61792 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
55209 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
50250 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years)
48099 Points -24%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
38311 Points -40%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
37738 Points -41%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
31844 Points -50%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (86309 - 169946, n=7)
122356 MB/s +42%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
110639 MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years)
108239 MB/s +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
94177 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
86309 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
72510 MB/s -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
66845 MB/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
64725 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
1339 MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years)
1220 MB/s +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
1089 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (866 - 1152, n=7)
1069 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
981 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
924 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
883 MB/s -19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
879 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
15209 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (13175 - 15675, n=7)
14559 KRay/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
11057 KRay/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years)
10153 KRay/s -33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
8923 KRay/s -41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
8448 KRay/s -44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
8145 KRay/s -46%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
6989 KRay/s -54%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
37023 MPixel/s +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years)
36937 MPixel/s +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
36147 MPixel/s +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
36118 MPixel/s +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (29922 - 41024, n=7)
34537 MPixel/s +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
29922 MPixel/s
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
29085 MPixel/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
27871 MPixel/s -7%

Wydajność systemu

Płynnie działający system zapewnia wystarczającą wydajność dla wymagających obszarów zastosowań, takich jak renderowanie, edycja wideo i gry - dobre wyniki PCMark mogą to potwierdzić. Transfery pamięci RAM są na normalnym poziomie dla pamięci DDR5 4800 RAM. Co ważne: automatyczne przełączanie pomiędzy dGPU i iGPU (Smart Access Graphic) zawsze trwa sekundę lub dwie. W tym czasie system zawiesza się.

Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dwukanałowym.
Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dwukanałowym.
PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
7927 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
7927 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
7691 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=198, last 2 years)
7594 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7332 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
7201 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
6909 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
6892 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
11150 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
10872 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
10844 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
10844 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=197, last 2 years)
10732 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10622 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10180 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9760 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
10505 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
10505 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9760 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9744 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=197, last 2 years)
9729 Points -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
9475 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9332 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
9131 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
12434 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
11868 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
11868 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=197, last 2 years)
11483 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10790 Points -9%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
9593 Points -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9393 Points -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
8957 Points -25%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)
1881 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1774 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1774 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
1774 Points 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1752 Points -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1718 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1663 Points -6%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)
1791 Points +4%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1720 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1715 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
1715 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1653 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1643 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1618 Points -6%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)
2046 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1992 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1990 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
1990 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1840 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1778 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1710 Points -14%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1771 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)
1704 Points +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1663 Points +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1577 Points +14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1570 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1388 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
1388 Points 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5937 pkt.
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6458 pkt.
PCMark 10 Score
7927 pkt.
Pomoc
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (59712 - 78739, n=7)
65350 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
59712 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years)
59647 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
58458 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57466 MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56560 MB/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
48549 MB/s -19%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44445 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67644 MB/s +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67639 MB/s +10%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65535 MB/s +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years)
63620 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
61609 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (50399 - 61735, n=7)
59858 MB/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
50338 MB/s -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
47514 MB/s -23%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (72541 - 91567, n=7)
81085 MB/s +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
72541 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65896 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years)
61811 MB/s -15%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57744 MB/s -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
57505 MB/s -21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
55012 MB/s -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
46901 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
96.1 ns * -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
94.9 ns * -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
93 ns * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (87.6 - 111.1, n=7)
93 ns * -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
90.4 ns *
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
84.6 ns * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81.9 ns * +9%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienie DPC

Standardowy test monitora opóźnień (surfowanie po sieci, odtwarzanie wideo 4k, wysokie obciążenie Prime95) ujawnił pewne anomalie. System nie wydaje się być odpowiedni do edycji wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą doprowadzić do poprawy lub nawet pogorszenia wydajności.

Monitor opóźnień
Monitor opóźnień
Monitor opóźnień
Monitor opóźnień
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7213.9 μs * -539%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4343.1 μs * -285%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1128.7 μs *
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1002.5 μs * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
869.7 μs * +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
237.9 μs * +79%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Urządzenia pamięci masowej

Asus wyposażył A16 w dysk SSD o pojemności 512 GB (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) firmy Micron - (zbyt) mało przestrzeni dyskowej jak na notebooka do gier. Zapewnia on przyzwoite prędkości przesyłu danych, ale nie jest jednym z najlepszych modeli wśród wszystkich dostępnych dysków SSD. Zwłaszcza szybkość zapisu jest znacznie poniżej dzisiejszych możliwości.

Dysk SSD PCIe-4 służy jako dysk systemowy.
Dysk SSD PCIe-4 służy jako dysk systemowy.
Jest miejsce na drugi dysk SSD.
Jest miejsce na drugi dysk SSD.
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4285 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1772 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 482 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 269.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2316 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1674 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.92 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119.5 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
87 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
77.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
75.5 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
64.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
59.2 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
54.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
45 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
 
33.3 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
5346 (4832.89min - 5346.06max) MB/s +137%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=197, last 2 years)
3533 MB/s +57%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
2501 (2479.67min - 2500.68max) MB/s +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2460 (2456.1min - 2460.17max) MB/s +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2390 (2088.15min - 2390.38max) MB/s +6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2291 (2271.71min - 2290.75max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
2253 (2206.83min - 2252.55max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1748 - 2253, n=5)
1891 MB/s -16%
seq write
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4675 (4517.46min - 4675.27max) MB/s +180%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=197, last 2 years)
3826 MB/s +129%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2991 (2932.66min - 2991.48max) MB/s +79%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2903 (2823.62min - 2902.74max) MB/s +74%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2230 (2171.45min - 2229.69max) MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1671 (1641.02min - 1670.59max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1519 - 1671, n=5)
1585 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1495 (1277.34min - 1495.48max) MB/s -11%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
7127 (6535.15min - 7127.37max) MB/s +66%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=197, last 2 years)
6386 MB/s +49%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
5009 (4674.55min - 5008.89max) MB/s +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
4725 (4035.45min - 4724.88max) MB/s +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4633 (4029.05min - 4633.45max) MB/s +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4556 (3742.64min - 4556.27max) MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
4294 (3669.6min - 4293.91max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (3234 - 4294, n=5)
3728 MB/s -13%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
4903 (812.65min - 4902.98max) MB/s +177%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=197, last 2 years)
4814 MB/s +172%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4797 (4359.23min - 4796.61max) MB/s +171%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3415 (3353.98min - 3415.42max) MB/s +93%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3411 (3334.51min - 3410.81max) MB/s +92%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2255 (2245.25min - 2255.17max) MB/s +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1773 (1734.23min - 1773.16max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1610 - 1773, n=5)
1682 MB/s -5%
4k q1 t1 read
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=197, last 2 years)
67.7 MB/s +106%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
65.9 (62.88min - 65.94max) MB/s +101%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
62.6 (62.25min - 62.63max) MB/s +91%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
51.1 (49.74min - 51.1max) MB/s +56%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
35.5 (35.31min - 35.47max) MB/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
32.8 (32.61min - 32.76max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (29.9 - 32.8, n=5)
31.9 MB/s -3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
31.8 (31.24min - 31.76max) MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
369 (333.31min - 369.47max) MB/s +180%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
328 (300.52min - 328.36max) MB/s +148%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
281 (267.52min - 281.12max) MB/s +113%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
267 (258.43min - 266.75max) MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=197, last 2 years)
225 MB/s +70%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
181.3 (175.93min - 181.25max) MB/s +37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
132 (125.41min - 131.99max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (106.4 - 132, n=5)
123.7 MB/s -6%
4k q32 t16 read
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3335 (3324.73min - 3334.83max) MB/s +96%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
2889 (2819.64min - 2889.22max) MB/s +69%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=197, last 2 years)
2587 MB/s +52%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2025 (1213.07min - 2024.78max) MB/s +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1705 (1701.1min - 1704.63max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1678 (1211.7min - 1678.15max) MB/s -2%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1323 (1320.64min - 1322.54max) MB/s -22%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (766 - 1705, n=5)
1017 MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3737 (3683.15min - 3737.15max) MB/s +136%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2291 (2256.15min - 2290.93max) MB/s +45%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2234 (2227.81min - 2234.36max) MB/s +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=197, last 2 years)
2152 MB/s +36%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1585 (1554.44min - 1585.47max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1509 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1457 (1124.17min - 1456.77max) MB/s -8%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (313 - 1585, n=5)
595 MB/s -62%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
9125 Points +114%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
7599 Points +78%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)
6835 Points +60%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
5903 Points +39%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
5541 Points +30%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
4261 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4020 Points -6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (2845 - 4261, n=4)
3370 Points -21%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
3235 Points +77%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
2625 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)
2505 Points +37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2348 Points +28%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2128 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1830 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1726 Points -6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1031 - 1830, n=4)
1305 Points -29%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
4288 Points +167%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3618 Points +126%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years)
3115 Points +94%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2404 Points +50%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2388 Points +49%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1604 Points
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1257 - 1735, n=4)
1491 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1456 Points -9%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
5856.12 MB/s +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)
4958 MB/s +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3976.53 MB/s +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3792 MB/s +3%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
3697.92 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
3690.93 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3667.76 MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (2798 - 3691, n=4)
3189 MB/s -14%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
4750.28 MB/s +191%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3884.67 MB/s +138%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)
3677 MB/s +125%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3020.8 MB/s +85%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2772 MB/s +70%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2106.21 MB/s +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1633.49 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1156 - 1633, n=4)
1329 MB/s -19%
4K Read
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
82.5 MB/s +93%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
77.12 MB/s +80%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years)
66.8 MB/s +56%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
63.89 MB/s +49%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
51.2 MB/s +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
49.25 MB/s +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
42.75 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (30 - 42.8, n=4)
35.7 MB/s -16%
4K Write
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
312.09 MB/s +164%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
276.66 MB/s +134%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
225 MB/s +90%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +79%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
207.32 MB/s +75%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
152.75 MB/s +29%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (99.8 - 137.5, n=4)
121.6 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
118.17 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
2572.63 MB/s +80%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
2194.79 MB/s +54%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years)
1938 MB/s +36%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1901.41 MB/s +33%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1675.54 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1429.83 MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1296 MB/s -9%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (721 - 1430, n=4)
953 MB/s -33%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
3536.78 MB/s +151%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3021.8 MB/s +114%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years)
2539 MB/s +80%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1949.13 MB/s +38%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1865.08 MB/s +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1411.25 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1003 - 1468, n=4)
1258 MB/s -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
954 MB/s -32%
Access Time Read
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (0.039 - 0.15, n=4)
0.095 ms * -64%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
0.08 ms * -38%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
0.066 ms * -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
0.058 ms *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=182, last 2 years)
0.05358 ms * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.05 ms * +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
0.044 ms * +24%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.029 ms * +50%
Access Time Write
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (0.116 - 0.414, n=4)
0.1968 ms * -67%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
0.118 ms *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.108 ms * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.105 ms * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
0.053 ms * +55%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years)
0.04643 ms * +61%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
0.033 ms * +72%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
0.013 ms * +89%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø3496 (2896.67-3526.02)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N: Ø6448 (5744.31-7139.12)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4460 (3778.02-4582.76)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB: Ø5011 (4694.47-5029.18)
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10: Ø2113 (226.43-4712.52)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4593 (4015.9-4669.31)

Karta graficzna

AMD Radeon RX 7600Soferuje 1792 shadery, jedną magistralę o szerokości 128 bitów i szybką pamięć GDDR6 (8 192 MB). Jego maksymalne TGP (95 watów) nie jest w pełni wykorzystywane zgodnie z testem Witcher 3 testu. Wyniki benchmarków są dokładnie takie, jak oczekiwano, a użycie profilu "Turbo" nie prowadzi do poprawy wydajności.

Konkurentów GPU średniej klasy można znaleźć w modelach GeForce RTX 4060,RTX 4050i RTX 3060w pełnych konfiguracjach (= maksymalne TGP). Choć nie jest w stanie dotrzymać kroku RTX 4060, to i tak w benchmarkach 3DMark poradziła sobie lepiej niż oba pozostałe modele GeForce. W praktycznym zastosowaniu w grach nie mogliśmy uzyskać spójnego obrazu: W zależności od gry, czasami jeden GPU radził sobie lepiej, czasami drugi - przynajmniej w testowanych przez nas grach.

Fire Strike (podłączony do sieci, wydajność)
Fire Strike (podłączony do sieci, wydajność)
Fire Strike (zużycie baterii, wydajność)Fire Strike (zużycie baterii, wydajność)
Fire Strike (zużycie baterii, wydajność)
Fire Strike (podłączony do sieci, turbo)
Fire Strike (podłączony do sieci, turbo)
Fire Strike (podłączony do sieci, cichy)
Fire Strike (podłączony do sieci, cichy)
Fire Strike (podłączony do sieci, turbo, dGPU)
Fire Strike (podłączony do sieci, turbo, dGPU)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
96.3 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
91.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
90.9 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
86.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
86 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
85 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
81.5 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
76.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=231, last 2 years)
40568 Points +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
37654 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
36470 Points +10%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (33037 - 35278, n=4)
34188 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
33988 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
33037 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
30959 Points -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
29569 Points -10%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
159354 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
157190 Points +1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (150582 - 164406, n=3)
156931 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
155806 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
150582 Points -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
136826 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=140, last 2 years)
136003 Points -13%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)
29509 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
27122 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
26561 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
26154 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (25514 - 26154, n=3)
25856 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
25514 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
23443 Points -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
22625 Points -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=233, last 2 years)
12091 Points +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
10855 Points +18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
10329 Points +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
9203 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (9080 - 9208, n=3)
9164 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9080 Points -1%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
8686 Points -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
8500 Points -8%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
55435 pkt.
3DMark 11 Performance
28721 pkt.
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
64441 pkt.
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23346 pkt.
3DMark Time Spy Score
9530 pkt.
Pomoc
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 226512, n=233, last 2 years)
121704 Points +87%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
104225 Points +60%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
102522 Points +57%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
102369 Points +57%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
100490 Points +54%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
87670 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
66133 Points +2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (65110 - 66133, n=2)
65622 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
65110 Points
Vulkan Score
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
55994 Points +55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
48885 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (1952 - 160279, n=229, last 2 years)
42431 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
36222 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (26646 - 36222, n=2)
31434 Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
26646 Points -26%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
14221 Points -61%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
4469 Points -88%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
4436 Points -88%
Geekbench 6.0
GPU OpenCL
Average of class Gaming
  (30029 - 213472, n=44, last 2 years)
116331 Points +77%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
96539 Points +47%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
65701 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
65701 Points 0%
GPU Vulkan
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
83464 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
83464 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1827 - 159996, n=43, last 2 years)
46212 Points -45%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
4237 Points -95%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=129, last 2 years)
2035 mpaths
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)
1817 mpaths
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)
1690 mpaths
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)
1197 mpaths
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=132, last 2 years)
1466 mpaths +389%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)
1231 mpaths +310%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)
1176 mpaths +292%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)
909 mpaths +203%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (5.0.1)
300 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
300 mpaths 0%
CPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)
14543 mpaths +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (1690 - 26944, n=144, last 2 years)
13490 mpaths +11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)
12370 mpaths +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (5.0.1)
12169 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
12169 mpaths 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)
9406 mpaths -23%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (v4.10.07 )
618 mpaths +544%
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=188, last 2 years)
603 mpaths +528%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H (v4.10.07 )
480 mpaths +400%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )
396 mpaths +313%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )
390 mpaths +306%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (v4.10.07 )
96 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (83 - 96, n=2)
89.5 mpaths -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (v4.10.07 )
83 mpaths -14%
CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (2741 - 37629, n=188, last 2 years)
19317 ksamples +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (v4.10.07 )
19237 ksamples +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (v4.10.07 )
17623 ksamples
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (14759 - 17623, n=2)
16191 ksamples -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (v4.10.07 )
14759 ksamples -16%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )
14218 ksamples -19%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )
14118 ksamples -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H (v4.10.07 )
13494 ksamples -23%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
231 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
230.8 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (2.93 - 231, n=36, last 2 years)
32.8 fps -86%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
17.5 fps -92%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
56.9 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
56.9 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.5 - 59.9, n=36, last 2 years)
38.8 fps -32%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
30 fps -47%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (99.8 - 687, n=34, last 2 years)
397 fps +23%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
323 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
322.7 fps
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
201.6 fps -38%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
53.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
53.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.6 - 76.5, n=36, last 2 years)
42.3 fps -21%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
20.6 fps -61%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
126.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
126.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 141.9, n=35, last 2 years)
103.5 fps -18%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
86.5 fps -32%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
73.4 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
73.4 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.8 - 117.2, n=36, last 2 years)
70.5 fps -4%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
53.9 fps -27%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 221, n=36, last 2 years)
122.5 fps +81%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
89.4 fps +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
67.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
67.5 fps 0%

Wydajność w grach

FA617 jest przeznaczony do gier na wysokich i maksymalnych ustawieniach. Rozdzielczość pełnego ekranu (1,920 x 1,200 pikseli) może być używana. Wyższe rozdzielczości będą użyteczne po podłączeniu odpowiedniego wyświetlacza - z częściowo zredukowanymi ustawieniami. Profil "Turbo" nie zwiększa liczby klatek na sekundę.

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 -1!
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
98 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
93.7 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.5 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78.6 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
76.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
73.1 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
70.8 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
68.5 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years)
117.4 fps +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
107.6 (101min) fps +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
103 (89min) fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (neu)
98.1 (84min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (91 - 98.1, n=2)
94.6 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
91 (77min) fps -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
87.6 (77min, 77.42P1) fps -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83 fps -15%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
119.6 (3.03min, 76.9P1) fps +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
113.9 (5.92min, 76.9P1) fps +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years)
107.7 fps +16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
103 (7.98min, 71.4P1) fps +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
92.9 (26.7min, 62.5P1) fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
92.2 (4.55min, 55.6P1) fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (85.5 - 92.9, n=2)
89.2 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
85.5 (3.46min, 62.5P1) fps -8%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=228, last 2 years)
111.7 fps +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
109.8 fps +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
100.8 fps +18%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
90.3 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.3)
85.2 fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1.3)
82.8 fps -3%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (78.2 - 85.2, n=2)
81.7 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.3)
78.2 fps -8%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=226, last 2 years)
207 fps +27%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
188.3 (28min, 137.1P1) fps +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
163.3 (16.3min, 119.3P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (162.7 - 163.3, n=2)
163 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
162.7 (111.4min, 120.7P1) fps 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
153.3 (32.3min, 117.2P1) fps -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
148.7 (20.2min, 114.3P1) fps -9%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
161.8 (140.3min) fps +33%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
144.3 (117.7min) fps +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=238, last 2 years)
143.2 fps +18%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
142.5 (121.3min) fps +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
137.5 (121.2min) fps +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
121.6 (100.8min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (110 - 121.6, n=2)
115.8 fps -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
110 (85.8min) fps -10%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
121.9 fps +113%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
109.3 fps +91%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=243, last 2 years)
102.3 fps +79%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
97 fps +69%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
86.7 fps +51%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
57.3 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (55 - 57.3, n=2)
56.2 fps -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
55 fps -4%
Returnal
1920x1080 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (27 - 155, n=25, last 2 years)
85.8 fps +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
70 (38min) fps +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
67 (34min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
67 fps 0%
1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing
Average of class Gaming
  (4 - 128, n=11, last 2 years)
73.5 fps +79%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
41 (16min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
41 fps 0%
Atomic Heart - 1920x1080 Atomic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (10.2 - 166, n=17, last 2 years)
74.4 fps +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
56.6 (31.1min, 47.6P0.1, 49.1P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
56.6 fps 0%
Sons of the Forest - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
76.7 (36.2min, 50.2P0.1, 56.6P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
76.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.8 - 93.9, n=18, last 2 years)
69.2 fps -10%
Resident Evil 4 Remake - 1920x1080 Max Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (19.7 - 143.2, n=14, last 2 years)
72.8 fps +39%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
72.7 (14.6min, 26.1P0.1, 52.5P1) fps +39%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
52.3 (6.38min, 13.8P0.1, 34.2P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
52.3 fps 0%
The Last of Us - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (31.6 - 105, n=13, last 2 years)
61.2 fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
51.5 (4.4min, 32.8P0.1, 43.4P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
51.5 fps 0%
Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Average of class Gaming
  (10.3 - 166.1, n=25, last 2 years)
74.7 fps +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
55.4 (27min, 28.2P0.1, 39P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
55.4 fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing AA:High T
Average of class Gaming
  (26.8 - 67, n=13, last 2 years)
46.3 fps +64%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
28.3 (13.7min, 14.6P0.1, 17.8P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
28.3 fps 0%
Company of Heroes 3 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Average of class Gaming
  (43.8 - 235, n=15, last 2 years)
131.6 fps +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
97.2 (41.4P0.1, 54.7P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
97.2 fps 0%
Dead Island 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
148.5 (19.5min, 20.4P0.1, 94.8P1) fps +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
113.1 (18.3min, 19P0.1, 73P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
113.1 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 181.7, n=11, last 2 years)
97.9 fps -13%
Flight Simulator 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra AA:TAA AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (24.7 - 74, n=8, last 2 years)
50.5 fps +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
42.7 (29.5min, 33.8P0.1, 36.4P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
42.7 fps 0%
Far Cry 6
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
104.7 (86min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
104.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.7 - 167, n=35, last 2 years)
98.8 fps -6%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (53 - 119, n=11, last 2 years)
86.5 fps +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
78.5 (36min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
78.5 fps 0%

Aby sprawdzić, czy liczba klatek na sekundę pozostaje w dużej mierze stała przez dłuższy czas, uruchomiliśmy grę The Witcher 3 na około 60 minut w rozdzielczości Full HD i maksymalnych ustawieniach jakości. Postać w grze nie była poruszana. Nie odnotowaliśmy spadku wydajności.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S; neu: Ø95.2 (89-101)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø96.9 (93-103)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø77.6 (73-84)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø100.7 (96-104)
Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø84.8 (81-91)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 184.7 171.7 92.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 382 166.5 98.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 157.5 143.1 132.2 121.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 215 117.2 85.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 85.1 72 57.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 135 120 115 108
Strange Brigade (2018) 440 228 190.8 163.3
Metro Exodus (2019) 187.3 116.5
The Division 2 (2019) 232 167 131 95
Control (2019) 235 116.6 83.5
Doom Eternal (2020) 376 209 184.3 179
Gears Tactics (2020) 381.4 216.1 138.1 95.4
Death Stranding (2020) 189.5 144.1 133.6 129.6
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) 134.9 85.5 60.1 42.7
Crysis Remastered (2020) 294 190.9 90.6 38.6
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 122.6 118.5 106.6 69.5
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 203 124 102 88
Hitman 3 (2021) 270 178.2 157.4 145.7
Far Cry 6 (2021) 151 133 119 104.7
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 197 144 135 74
GRID Legends (2022) 214.9 182.8 156.5 129.3
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 198.1 156.8 105.7 82.2
F1 22 (2022) 263 244 190 50.5
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) 98.2 78 66.1 55.4
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 118.4 88.7 72 55.4
Returnal (2023) 91 88 78 67
Atomic Heart (2023) 167.1 125.5 71.6 56.6
Company of Heroes 3 (2023) 143.4 125.9 97.4 97.2
Sons of the Forest (2023) 93.2 81.4 78 76.7
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) 107.4 83.2 78.9 52.3
The Last of Us (2023) 81.4 67.6 60.2 51.5
Dead Island 2 (2023) 201 168.1 122.7 113.1

Emisje - FA617XS może być dość głośny

Emisja hałasu

W codziennym użytkowaniu (biuro, Internet itp.), A16 zazwyczaj pracuje cicho, często bezgłośnie - niezależnie od wybranego profilu. Poziom ciśnienia akustycznego może wzrosnąć do 53 dB(A) ("Turbo") lub 51 dB(A) ("Performance") w trybie gry. Ogólnie niższą emisję hałasu można uzyskać korzystając z profilu "Quiet". Moc obliczeniowa jest wtedy zmniejszona tylko w bardzo niewielkim stopniu.

Hałas

luz
25 / 26 / 28 dB
obciążenie
43 / 53 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
cichy
40 dB(A)
słyszalny
50 dB(A)
irytujący
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (odległość 15 cm)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.541.342.841.138.738.52538.73939.542.138.738.73147.945.143.547.644.647.94031.62831.13227.931.65028.924.927.32925.428.96330.229.230.428.62230.28033.820.623.218.718.533.810023.719.820.517.518.623.712525.622.618.318.21925.616027.925.420.418.619.227.92003128.325.122.921.23125031.124.820.719.51831.131530.623.715.618.215.430.640032.726.616.118.21232.750035.431.514.118.711.935.46303830.812.816.811.83880038.831.811.920.811.338.8100038.331.211.41511.338.31250403211.814.211.240160041.634.411.916.311.841.6200041.23113.414.412.541.2250037.829.713.214.613.337.8315038.630.91315.113.338.6400036.728.912.913.913.736.7500039.431.913.413.913.939.4630038.826.513.814.814.238.8800034.521.613.414.413.834.51000028.920.313.114.913.628.91250025.619.212.913.913.225.61600021.22112.212.512.321.2SPL50.642.625.828.125.350.6N7.44.10.810.77.4median 35.4median 28.3median 13.4median 15.1median 13.3median 35.4Delta5.64.42.22.12.15.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G5 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Noise
8%
7%
-11%
-11%
3%
off / environment *
25
23
8%
24
4%
25
-0%
19.52
22%
24
4%
Idle Minimum *
25
23.1
8%
24
4%
26
-4%
31.05
-24%
24
4%
Idle Average *
26
23.1
11%
24
8%
27
-4%
31.05
-19%
25
4%
Idle Maximum *
28
26.6
5%
24
14%
32
-14%
31.05
-11%
28
-0%
Load Average *
43
34.7
19%
37.71
12%
53
-23%
55.66
-29%
42
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
47.6
7%
45.75
10%
56
-10%
55.7
-9%
50
2%
Load Maximum *
53
54.8
-3%
54.55
-3%
64
-21%
55.51
-5%
50
6%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Temperatura

Notebook nagrzewa się zauważalnie pod obciążeniem, ale nie nadmiernie. W codziennym użytkowaniu temperatury mieszczą się w zielonej strefie. To ostatnie nie miało miejsca w siostrzanym modelu- zakładamy błąd/wadę urządzenia.

 50 °C53 °C45 °C 
 40 °C47 °C44 °C 
 38 °C26 °C31 °C 
maks. w ogóle: 53 °C
średnia: 41.6 °C
48 °C44 °C46 °C
37 °C33 °C37 °C
27 °C25 °C30 °C
maks. w ogóle: 48 °C
średnia: 36.3 °C
zasilacz  54 °C | temperatura otoczenia 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Heat
1%
-8%
9%
-14%
-17%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
42.8
19%
47
11%
42
21%
52.6
1%
54
-2%
Maximum Bottom *
48
50
-4%
48
-0%
45
6%
62.4
-30%
47
2%
Idle Upper Side *
30
29.6
1%
35
-17%
28
7%
33.6
-12%
40
-33%
Idle Bottom *
30
34
-13%
38
-27%
30
-0%
34.8
-16%
40
-33%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Test warunków skrajnych

Test obciążeniowy (Prime95 i Furmark w trybie ciągłym) symuluje ekstremalny scenariusz w celu przetestowania stabilności systemu pod pełnym obciążeniem. Procesor (3,4 do 3,5 GHz) i karta graficzna (~1500 MHz) przeszły test z częstotliwościami taktowania poniżej odpowiedniego zegara bazowego.

Test warunków skrajnych
Test warunków skrajnych
Test warunków skrajnych
Test warunków skrajnych
Test warunków skrajnych
Test warunków skrajnych
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

Głośniki

Głośniki stereo generują ogólnie przyzwoity dźwięk.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.139.542.12540.24340.23148.549.948.54033.836.733.85037.64137.66333.228.933.28037.123.237.110042.922.742.912543.725.743.716048.525.748.520051.425.651.425056.825.256.831557.818.957.840061.815.761.850064.813.964.863069.215.469.280068.91168.9100070.110.770.1125068.89.868.8160068.510.368.5200067.81167.8250061.811.661.8315067.811.767.840006711.767500065.212.165.2630061.11361.1800062.312.162.31000059.611.859.61250052.911.352.91600046.910.846.9SPL78.825.978.8N44.70.844.7median 61.8median 12.1median 61.8Delta7.847.836.73536.730.923.130.928.722.328.725.917.825.923.622.123.623.123.523.124.419.924.42016.32023.314.723.331.314.231.338.312.238.344.411.144.444.814.744.851.812.151.856.110.456.160.911.960.96396363.29.363.261.19.161.1629.96257.41057.459.110.359.153.911.353.956.211.256.258.711.758.76111.76165.911.965.963.512.163.558.212.458.249.312.449.372.723.172.730.50.430.5median 57.4median 11.7median 57.491.79hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XSLenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Zarządzanie energią - laptop do gier o świetnych czasach pracy

Zużycie energii

Nie ma żadnych nieprawidłowości pod względem zużycia energii. Wskaźniki są na normalnym poziomie dla zainstalowanego sprzętu. Test warunków skrajnych i Witcher 3 zostały przeprowadzone przy stałym zużyciu energii. Moc zasilacza (240 W) jest więcej niż wystarczająca.

Pobór mocy
wyłączony / stan wstrzymaniadarklight 0.1 /  W
luzdarkmidlight 7 / 10 / 15 W
obciążenie midlight 86 / 172 W
 color bar
Legenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G5 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-107%
2%
-25%
-16%
-7%
-4%
-69%
Idle Minimum *
7
24.5
-250%
8.5
-21%
8
-14%
7.66
-9%
8
-14%
7.5 ?(7 - 8, n=2)
-7%
Idle Average *
10
29.2
-192%
10.2
-2%
12
-20%
10.3
-3%
11
-10%
10.5 ?(10 - 11, n=2)
-5%
Idle Maximum *
15
34.3
-129%
11.3
25%
18
-20%
16.05
-7%
16
-7%
15.5 ?(15 - 16, n=2)
-3%
Load Average *
86
98.7
-15%
84
2%
101
-17%
115.8
-35%
97
-13%
91.5 ?(86 - 97, n=2)
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
160.6
178.6
-11%
128
20%
180.8
-13%
168.7
-5%
161.5
-1%
Load Maximum *
172
249.6
-45%
189
-10%
284
-65%
234.6
-36%
168
2%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø160.6 (159.6-162.3)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø159.3 (157.9-160.8)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.82 (7.33-14.6)

power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.9 (91.1-102.9)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103.1 (98.2-128)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø156.4 (155-168.2)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø156.5 (155.1-169.5)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø17 (11.6-29.8)

Żywotność baterii

16-calowe urządzenie osiągnęło czasy pracy wynoszące odpowiednio 12:25 h i 12:26 h w naszym teście WLAN (wywoływanie stron internetowych za pomocą skryptu) i teście wideo (krótki film Big Buck Bunny (kodowanie H.264, FHD) w pętli). Podczas obu testów funkcje oszczędzania energii laptopa były wyłączone, a jasność wyświetlacza ustawiona na około 150 cd/m². Moduły łączności bezprzewodowej również były wyłączone na czas testu wideo

FA617 zapewnił doskonałe czasy pracy i pozostawił konkurencję w kurzu. Połączenie oszczędnego APU i dużej pojemności baterii zdecydowanie się tutaj opłaca.

Bateria ma pojemność 90 Wh.
Bateria ma pojemność 90 Wh.
Wydajność akumulatora
luz
20h 17min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 113)
12h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 26min
obciążenie
0h 52min
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
Gigabyte G5 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Czasy pracy
-53%
-20%
-29%
-39%
23%
-23%
Reader / Idle
1217
401
-67%
528
-57%
1212
0%
H.264
746
264
-65%
339
-55%
130
-83%
WiFi v1.3
745
205
-72%
260
-65%
373
-50%
342
-54%
724
-3%
Load
52
41
-21%
89
71%
76
46%
62
19%
90
73%
Witcher 3 ultra
79

Za

+ matowy wyświetlacz WUXGA (165 Hz) w formacie 16:10
+ dobra wydajność systemu
+ dwa gniazda M.2 (PCIe 4, M.2-2280)
+ rozszerzalna pamięć RAM
+ USB 4
+ Power Delivery
+ świetna żywotność baterii

Przeciw

- może być głośny pod obciążeniem
- Niskiej klasy dysk SSD z niewielką ilością pamięci
- przeciętna szybkość transmisji danych WLAN
- gąbczaste sprzężenie zwrotne klawiatury
- rozczarowująca kamera internetowa

Werdykt - laptop Asusa z (zbyt) małą ilością pamięci masowej

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS, urządzenie testowe dostarczone przez Asus Germany.
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS, urządzenie testowe dostarczone przez Asus Germany.

A16 jest skonfigurowany do gier w rozdzielczości WUXGA przy wysokich i maksymalnych ustawieniach, ale powinien być przydatny w wielu innych dziedzinach, takich jak edycja wideo i renderowanie. Zespół AMD składający się zRyzen 9 7940HSiRadeon RX 7600Szapewniają laptopowi niezbędną wydajność. Oba podzespoły pracują z niezmiennie wysokimi częstotliwościami taktowania.

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition to dobrze zaokrąglony laptop do gier średniej klasy, którego imponujące czasy pracy na baterii są jego dumą i radością.

W porównaniu doRyzen-7-7735HSaPU znajdującym się w jegosiostrzanym modelu, 7940HS-APU ma do zaoferowania znacznie lepszą wydajność procesora, pomimo posiadania tej samej liczby rdzeni i tych samych limitów mocy. Tutaj daje o sobie znać nowoczesna architektura (Zen 4 vs. Zen 3+) i wyższe częstotliwości taktowania.

Niesamowite czasy pracy urządzenia są z pewnością jego wyjątkową zaletą: jego praktyczne pomiary wynoszące około 12,5 godziny nie są generalnie osiągane przez wiele innych laptopów biurowych. Pozytyw: Baterię można ładować za pomocą zasilacza USB-C (min. 65 W, 20 V) - jeden port USB-C obsługuje Power Delivery. Własny zasilacz niekoniecznie musiałby być noszony przy sobie.

Zainstalowany wyświetlacz IPS (16 cali, 1920 x 1200 pikseli) ma przyjazne dla pracy proporcje 16:10 i ogólnie pozostawił na nas dobre wrażenie - jeśli już, to jasność mogłaby być nieco większa. Zainstalowany dysk SSD klasy podstawowej idealnie nadawałby się do prostego laptopa biurowego - ale nie do laptopa do gier za 1700 USD. Oferowana pamięć masowa (512 GB) i dane ani nie spełniają wymagań użytkowników, ani nie spełniają ich oczekiwań.

TheLegion Pro 5 16IRX8może być odpowiednią alternatywą. Charakteryzuje się lepszą wydajnością i jaśniejszym ekranem niż A16 - ale wyraźnie nie ma do zaoferowania tak imponujących czasów pracy. TheGigabyte G5 KEmoże być dobrą budżetową alternatywą: Otrzymujesz podobny poziom wydajności graficznej za znacznie niższą cenę. Chociaż: Ten laptop nie jest dostarczany z preinstalowanym systemem operacyjnym Windows.

Cena i dostępność

Wersję A16 z 16 GB pamięci RAM i 512 GB dyskiem SSD można kupić na stronie Asusa za około 1371 dolarów.

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS - 05/06/2023 v7
Sascha Mölck

Wykonanie
79 / 98 → 81%
Klawiatura
77%
Myszka
92%
Komunikacja
63 / 80 → 79%
Waga
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Akumulator
89 / 95 → 94%
Wyświetlacz
88%
Wydajność w grach
99%
Wydajność w programach użytkowych
96%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 87%
Hałas
79 / 90 → 87%
Głośniki
77%
Kamerka
39 / 85 → 46%
Średnio
79%
87%
Gaming - Ważona średnia

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> laptopy testy i recenzje notebooki > Laptopy > Recenzja Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS: Laptop AMD z czasem pracy do 20 godzin
Sascha Mölck, 2023-06- 8 (Update: 2023-06- 8)