Recenzja MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4K: Elita wśród laptopów UHD DTR

Wierny swojej nazwie. MSI Titan GT77 to jeden z najlepiej działających obecnie laptopów. Procesor Core i9-12900HX oraz GeForce RTX 3080 Ti pozwalają na grę w 4K, edycję wideo i renderowanie. Po niedawnym zrecenzowaniu Titan GT77 z panelem FHD, teraz dostaliśmy w swoje ręce model o najwyższej specyfikacji wyposażony w wyświetlacz 4K.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (tłumaczenie DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 27/09/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

Gracze i twórcy są zarówno częścią grupy docelowej MSI Titan GT77 12UHS - laptopa zastępującego komputer stacjonarny (DTR). Wysokiej klasy specyfikacja (Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop i 64 GB pamięci RAM) wypycha cenę laptopa do około 5 600 euro (5 980 dolarów). Wyświetlacz to główna różnica między tym urządzeniem a jego Modelu rodzeństwa FHDktóry niedawno recenzowaliśmy: obecny egzemplarz recenzencki ma na pokładzie panel 4K. Niektórzy z jego konkurentów to m.in Schenker XMG Ultra 17, Razer Blade 17 oraz Alienware x17 R2.

Ponieważ to urządzenie i jego odpowiednik FHD są zbudowane identycznie, możecie przeczytać naszą recenzję dot MSI Titan GT77 12UHS (Core i9, FHD), by uzyskać więcej informacji na temat obudowy, urządzeń wejściowych i głośników.

Test device courtesy of MSI Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS

Procesor

Intel Core i9-12900HX 16 x 1.7 - 5 GHz, 200 W PL2 / Short Burst, 100 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-HX

Karta grafiki

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 1395 MHz, pamięć: 2000 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.1659, Optimus

Pamięć

64 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, four memory slots (two in use), max. 128 GB

Matryca

17.30 cali 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pikseli 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN06.1, IPS, refleksująca: nie, 120 Hz

Chipset

Intel HM670 (Alder Lake-S PCH)

Dysk twardy

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB

, 4x M.2 2280 (3x PCIe 4x4, 1x PCIe 5x4 compatible), 1750 GB wolne miejsce

Złącza

3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, gniazda audio: Headset combined port, czytnik kart: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Łączność

Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Gabaryty

wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 23 x 397 x 330

Akumulator

99.99 Wh, 6578 mAh litowo-polimerowy

System operacyjny

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

kamerka: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Inne

głośniki: 2 speakers, 2 subwoofers, klawiatura: Mechanical, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, MSI gaming mouse, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), Norton Security (Trial), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji

Waga

3.385 kg, zasilacz: 1.335 kg

Cena

5599 Euro

Odnośniki

MSI strona producenta
MSI sekcja

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

pełna specyfikacja

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.8 %	09/2022	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3.4 kg	23 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
89.9 %		Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	19.9 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
89.2 %		Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3.1 kg	20.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
84.9 %		Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	4.7 kg	43.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Porównanie wielkości

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Alienware x17 R2 P48E MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 DIN A4 ❌

Po lewej: port ładowania, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), czytnik kart SD, gniazdo combo mikrofonu/słuchawek

Po prawej stronie: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), 2x Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), Mini DisplayPort, HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	222 MB/s ∼100% +276%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)	182.9 MB/s ∼82% +210%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	152 MB/s ∼68% +158%
Average of class Gaming (18.5 - 222, n=90, last 2 years)	106.7 MB/s ∼48% +81%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	69.1 (68.5^min - 72.99^max) MB/s ∼31% +17%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	59 MB/s ∼27%

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1691 (1589^min - 1731^max) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1685 (869^min - 1733^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1672 (864^min - 1737^max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (1464 - 1714, n=10)	1623 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=71, last 2 years)	1459 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1610 (1421^min - 1675^max) MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (1330 - 1622, n=8)	1523 MBit/s ∼95% +15%
Average of class Gaming (740 - 1780, n=64, last 2 years)	1378 MBit/s ∼86% +4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1330 (655^min - 1434^max) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AX12
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1540 MBit/s ∼100%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)	1399 (1332^min - 1446^max) MBit/s ∼91%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (1137 - 1270, n=2)	1204 MBit/s ∼78%
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=84, last 2 years)	1174 MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1510 MBit/s ∼100%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)	1209 (896^min - 1302^max) MBit/s ∼80%
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1588, n=84, last 2 years)	1152 MBit/s ∼76%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (986 - 1257, n=2)	1122 MBit/s ∼74%

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1488 (1300-1531)

Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW); iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1398 (1332-1446)

Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1209 (896-1302)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1680 (1438-1732)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1309 (655-1434)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1610 (1421-1675)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1656 (869-1733)

Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1642 (864-1737)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1691 (1589-1731)

ColorChecker MSI Titan GT77 12UHS: 13.64 ∆E min: 5.63 - max: 21.9 ∆E

Wyświetlacz - Jasny panel o wysokim pokryciu DCI-P3

Matowy panel 4K (3 840 x 2 160 pikseli) w recenzowanym egzemplarzu zapewnia znacznie wyższą jasność szczytową niż wyświetlacz FHD w jego rodzeństwa (401 cd/m² vs. 275,1 cd/m²).

Niemniej jednak można jeszcze poprawić kontrast (871:1 vs. 700:1): oba wyświetlacze nie osiągają wartości, które uważamy za dobre (> 1000:1). Choć oba panele są bardzo responsywne, model FHD oferuje znacznie wyższą częstotliwość odświeżania (120 Hz vs. 360 Hz). Podczas naszych pomiarów nie zaobserwowaliśmy żadnego migotania PWM.


407 cd/m²	394 cd/m²	384 cd/m²
411 cd/m²	418 cd/m²	390 cd/m²
415 cd/m²	411 cd/m²	379 cd/m²

podświetlenie ekranu

AU Optronics B173ZAN06.1

X-Rite i1Pro 2

maksimum: 418 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 401 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 91 %
na akumulatorze: 418 cd/m²
kontrast: 871:1 (czerń: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.47 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 0.66
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
86.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.129

Download Plik ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k AU Optronics B173ZAN06.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30	Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 AU Optronics B173ZAN06.9, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30	Alienware x17 R2 P48E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Sharp SHP1544 LQ173M1JW08, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		1%	-9%	-16%	-14%
Display P3 Coverage	97	99.4 2%	79.2 -18%	69.8 -28%	70.8 -27%
sRGB Coverage	99.8	100 0%	99.8 0%	97.2 -3%	98.9 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	86.2	87.3 1%	79.6 -8%	72 -16%	73 -15%
Response Times		-27%	-109%	-44%	19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	5.2 ?(1.2, 4)	7.5 ?(2.1, 5.4) -44%	12.4 ?(6.4, 6) -138%	5.6 ?(2.8, 2.8) -8%	3.03 ?(1.28, 1.75) 42%
Response Time Black / White *	5.1 ?(1.5, 3.6)	5.6 ?(1.6, 4) -10%	9.2 ?(5.2, 4) -80%	9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4) -80%	5.28 ?(2.32, 2.96) -4%
PWM Frequency
Screen		28%	3%	9%	-17%
Brightness middle	418	503 20%	365.4 -13%	306 -27%	280 -33%
Brightness	401	486 21%	344 -14%	299 -25%	275 -31%
Brightness Distribution	91	84 -8%	85 -7%	93 2%	79 -13%
Black Level *	0.48	0.44 8%	0.29 40%	0.22 54%	0.4 17%
Contrast	871	1143 31%	1260 45%	1391 60%	700 -20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.47	1.08 56%	3.17 -28%	1.92 22%	2.1 15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.81	4.54 42%	7.69 2%	4.78 39%	5.83 25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.66	0.6 9%	0.51 23%	1.34 -103%	1.58 -139%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.4	1.3 70%	5.3 -20%	2 55%	3.3 25%
Gamma	2.129 ^103%	2.151 ^102%	2.18 ^101%	2.153 ^102%	2.13 ^103%
CCT	7197 ^90%	6541 ^99%	5879 ^111%	6738 ^96%	7060 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)				72
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)				93
Total Average (Program / Settings)		1% / 14%	-38% / -15%	-17% / -4%	-4% / -11%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Wyświetlacz 4K pokrywa niemal całą przestrzeń barw sRGB (99,8%) i DCI-P3 (97%) oraz do 86% AdobeRGB. Panel FHD w modelu rodzeństwa nie jest w stanie dotrzymać kroku pod tym względem (sRGB: 97%, AdobeRGB: 73%, DCI-P3: 71%). Oznacza to, że panel 4K jest najlepszym rozwiązaniem, jeśli dokładność kolorów jest dla Ciebie ważna

Ekrany mają już dobre odwzorowanie kolorów zaraz po wyjęciu z pudełka: wyświetlacze UHD i FHD spełniają pożądaną wartość (Delta E < 3) przy swoich niezauważalnych różnicach kolorów wynoszących odpowiednio 2,47 i 2,1. Kalibracja ekranów sprawiła, że ich reprodukcja w skali szarości stała się bardziej zrównoważona, a różnice kolorów zmniejszyły się odpowiednio do 0,66 i 1,58. W infoboxie każdego monitora można znaleźć link do pobrania stworzonych przez nas profili barwnych za darmo.

Uwaga: Oprogramowanie MSI True Color pozwala na dostosowanie kolorów do lepszego dopasowania do palety barw lub zdefiniowanego scenariusza użytkowania. My wybraliśmy ustawienie wstępne "Display P3".

CalMAN: nasycenie kolorów (skalibrowane)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.5 ms rise
5.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.2 ms rise
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19232 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Panel IPS oferuje stabilne kąty widzenia, dzięki czemu można go bez problemu oglądać z każdej pozycji. Wyświetlacz jest również bardzo czytelny na zewnątrz.

Niedokładne odwzorowanie kolorów z powodu problemów z oprogramowaniem

Niektóre kombinacje oprogramowania True Color i sterownika iGPU mogą prowadzić do niedokładnej reprodukcji obrazów. Gdy tak się stanie, wszystkie wyświetlane kolory będą wydawać się zniekształcone i wybielone. MSI zaleca pełną deinstalację, a następnie ponowną instalację obu komponentów. Po wypróbowaniu stwierdziliśmy, że ta metoda rozwiązuje problem.

Wydajność - Ampere i Alder Lake zapewniają dużo oomph.

Dzięki modelowi Titan GT77 12UHS, MSI ma w swojej ofercie bardzo wydajny 17,3-calowy laptop, który sprawdza się w każdym wymagającym scenariuszu użytkowania.

Warunki badania

Pomiędzy czterema profilami wydajności można przełączać się za pomocą preinstalowanego MSI Center (patrz zdjęcia) lub poprzez naciśnięcie kombinacji klawiszy Fn+F7. Jeśli aktywowana jest wyższa, oparta na AI funkcja "Smart Auto" (tak jak w naszym przypadku), MSI Center automatycznie dobierze odpowiedni profil do aktualnej sytuacji.

Testowaliśmy model FHD z aktywnym trybem dGPU. Z kolei Nvidia Optimus była włączona podczas naszej recenzji obecnego urządzenia. Dlatego wyniki pomiarów nie zawsze mogą być bezpośrednio porównywalne.

Procesor

Procesor Core i9-12900HX (Alder Lake) składa się z ośmiu rdzeni wydajnościowych (Hyper-Threading, 2,3 do 5 GHz) i ośmiu rdzeni efektywnościowych (bez Hyper-Threading, 1,7 do 3,6 GHz), co daje łącznie 24 wątki.

W Cinebench R15 procesor ukończył zarówno test wielowątkowy (P-cores: 4,4 GHz, E-cores: 3,3 GHz), jak i test jednowątkowy (P-cores: 500 MHz do 5 GHz, E-cores: 400 MHz do 3,6 GHz) przy wysokim taktowaniu. Na zasilaniu akumulatorowym wypadał on nieco wolniej.

Test pętli Cinebench 15 wykazał, że procesor jest w stanie pracować nieprzerwanie z wysokim taktowaniem. Zastosowanie profilu "Extreme Performance" spowodowało, że wydajność była marginalnie bardziej stabilna.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3238 (3157.31-3652.17)

Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1562 (1542.73-1850.99)

Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2889 (2849.61-2917.79)

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K: Ø2057 (2014.3-2361.09)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX; dGPU, Extreme Leistung: Ø3238 (3176.37-3629.23)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3311 (3259.45-3569.52)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX; 4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost: Ø3238 (3176.37-3623.23)

Prędkości zegara procesora przy uruchomieniu pętli CB15

Prędkości taktowania procesora podczas pracy w pętli CB15 (Extreme Performance, Cooler Boost)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	85.4 pt ∼85%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	84.9 pt ∼85%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	84.1 pt ∼84%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX	83.5 pt ∼84%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	74.7 pt ∼75%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	62.5 pt ∼63%
Average of class Gaming	61.2 pt ∼61%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	57.9 pt ∼58%

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	23482 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	23176 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	22982 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (18337 - 23482, n=8)	22529 Points ∼96% -4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	18870 (18654.1^min - 18869.7^max) Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=229, last 2 years)	15408 Points ∼66% -34%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	14066 Points ∼60% -40%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	10522 Points ∼45% -55%
Single Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	1936 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (1897 - 1936, n=8)	1917 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1913 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	1912 Points ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	1908 Points ∼99% -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	1905 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=226, last 2 years)	1638 Points ∼85% -15%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	1619 Points ∼84% -16%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	9042 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	8913 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	8667 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (7037 - 9042, n=8)	8602 Points ∼95% -5%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	7169 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13457, n=232, last 2 years)	5810 Points ∼64% -36%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	5055 Points ∼56% -44%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	4069 Points ∼45% -55%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	745 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	738 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (728 - 745, n=8)	738 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	736 Points ∼99% -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	727 Points ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	699 Points ∼94% -6%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	634 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=232, last 2 years)	631 Points ∼85% -15%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	3652 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	3623 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	3570 (3259.45^min - 3569.52^max) Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (2830 - 3652, n=8)	3493 Points ∼96% -4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	2918 (2849.61^min - 2917.79^max) Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5554, n=237, last 2 years)	2475 Points ∼68% -32%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	2361 Points ∼65% -35%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	1851 Points ∼51% -49%
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	282 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	278 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	278 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (274 - 282, n=8)	278 Points ∼99% -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	272 Points ∼96% -4%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	258 Points ∼91% -9%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	254 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=233, last 2 years)	247 Points ∼88% -12%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	307 Seconds * ∼100% -106%
Average of class Gaming (93 - 1259, n=234, last 2 years)	245 Seconds * ∼80% -64%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	227 Seconds * ∼74% -52%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	173.6 Seconds * ∼57% -17%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (144 - 201, n=8)	154.4 Seconds * ∼50% -4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	149 Seconds * ∼49%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	147 Seconds * ∼48% +1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	144 Seconds * ∼47% +3%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	87811 MIPS ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	87421 MIPS ∼100% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	86234 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (69778 - 88128, n=7)	84614 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	69146 MIPS ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 135927, n=229, last 2 years)	62802 MIPS ∼72% -28%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	57579 MIPS ∼66% -34%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	47259 MIPS ∼54% -46%
7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	6336 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (6165 - 6358, n=7)	6293 MIPS ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	6256 MIPS ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	6234 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	6174 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	5926 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	5803 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7332, n=230, last 2 years)	5735 MIPS ∼91% -9%

Geekbench 5.4
Multi-Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	16329 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	16294 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	16250 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (15116 - 16925, n=8)	16247 Points ∼99% -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	13717 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 21853, n=228, last 2 years)	11009 Points ∼67% -33%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	10482 Points ∼64% -36%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	9716 Points ∼60% -40%
Single-Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1923 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	1919 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	1911 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (1874 - 1949, n=8)	1909 Points ∼99% -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	1878 Points ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	1797 Points ∼93% -6%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	1777 Points ∼92% -7%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=228, last 2 years)	1649 Points ∼86% -14%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	26 fps ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	26 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	25.6 fps ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (19.6 - 26.6, n=7)	25 fps ∼96% -4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.4 fps ∼82% -18%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 34.8, n=234, last 2 years)	17.5 fps ∼67% -33%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	17.1 fps ∼66% -34%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	12.7 fps ∼49% -51%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=230, last 2 years)	51.2 s * ∼100% -37%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	40.7 s * ∼79% -9%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	40.5 s * ∼79% -8%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	39 s * ∼76% -4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	39 s * ∼76% -4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	37.4 s * ∼73%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (33.6 - 42.4, n=7)	37.4 s * ∼73% -0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	37.3 s * ∼73% -0%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=230, last 2 years)	0.514 sec * ∼100% -21%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	0.4981 sec * ∼97% -17%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4463 sec * ∼87% -5%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4323 sec * ∼84% -2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4242 sec * ∼83%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	0.4217 sec * ∼82% +1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (0.4159 - 0.4242, n=7)	0.4211 sec * ∼82% +1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4194 sec * ∼82% +1%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

3652 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

245 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

282 Points

Pomoc

... porównanie

Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	99.1 pt ∼99%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98.8 pt ∼99%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98.3 pt ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX	92.7 pt ∼93%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	76.5 pt ∼77%
Average of class Gaming	71 pt ∼71%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65.9 pt ∼66%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	43.3 pt ∼43%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	22183 KRay/s ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000, 4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	22094 KRay/s ∼100% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	21797 KRay/s ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (11535 - 22183, n=7)	19240 KRay/s ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (v6.32.5600)	15660 KRay/s ∼71% -29%
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 52479, n=202, last 2 years)	14065 KRay/s ∼63% -37%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9759 KRay/s ∼44% -56%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5706 KRay/s ∼26% -74%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	108267 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	107354 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000, 4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	107179 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (52916 - 110093, n=7)	96060 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 227882, n=202, last 2 years)	74815 Points ∼69% -31%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (v6.32.5600)	64078 Points ∼59% -41%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	43695 Points ∼40% -60%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	28086 Points ∼26% -74%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	5005 MB/s ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000, 4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	4971 MB/s ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	4945 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (v6.32.5600)	4851 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (3559 - 5123, n=7)	4698 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 8525, n=202, last 2 years)	3530 MB/s ∼71% -29%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3504 MB/s ∼70% -30%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	1933 MB/s ∼39% -61%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	107120 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (v6.32.5600)	104213 Points ∼97% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	103770 Points ∼97% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	103712 Points ∼97%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000, 4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	103647 Points ∼97% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (101029 - 104457, n=7)	102903 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 180473, n=202, last 2 years)	99138 Points ∼93% -4%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	83594 Points ∼78% -19%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	13009 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000, 4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	12970 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	12969 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (10475 - 13062, n=7)	12627 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 29598, n=202, last 2 years)	10890 Points ∼84% -16%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (v6.32.5600)	10633 Points ∼82% -18%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	10402 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	7257 Points ∼56% -44%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	53628 Points ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000, 4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	53077 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	52544 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (31779 - 53628, n=7)	47917 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 118401, n=202, last 2 years)	40176 Points ∼75% -25%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (v6.32.5600)	39217 Points ∼73% -27%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	27285 Points ∼51% -49%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	15575 Points ∼29% -71%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000, 4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	180248 MB/s ∼100% +1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	179186 MB/s ∼99% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	178915 MB/s ∼99%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (125268 - 183146, n=7)	166223 MB/s ∼92% -7%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (v6.32.5600)	156370 MB/s ∼87% -13%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	106367 MB/s ∼59% -41%
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 236139, n=202, last 2 years)	104245 MB/s ∼58% -42%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	41612 MB/s ∼23% -77%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	1408 MB/s ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000, 4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	1403 MB/s ∼100% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	1389 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (990 - 1408, n=7)	1336 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	1203 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (v6.32.5600)	939 MB/s ∼67% -33%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2090, n=223, last 2 years)	892 MB/s ∼63% -37%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	585 MB/s ∼42% -58%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	11913 KRay/s ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000, 4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	11855 KRay/s ∼100% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	11612 KRay/s ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (6663 - 11913, n=7)	10470 KRay/s ∼88% -12%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (v6.32.5600)	8621 KRay/s ∼72% -28%
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 28105, n=202, last 2 years)	7642 KRay/s ∼64% -36%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5748 KRay/s ∼48% -52%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3181 KRay/s ∼27% -73%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (40239 - 47710, n=7)	42604 MPixel/s ∼100% +5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	41007 MPixel/s ∼96% +1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	40650 MPixel/s ∼95%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000, 4k, Extreme Leistung, Cooler Boost)	40589 MPixel/s ∼95% 0%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	37573 MPixel/s ∼88% -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	34534 MPixel/s ∼81% -15%
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 51096, n=203, last 2 years)	30209 MPixel/s ∼71% -26%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (v6.32.5600)	25859 MPixel/s ∼61% -36%

Wydajność systemu

GT77 nie brakuje mocy obliczeniowej - widać to od razu po spojrzeniu na jego specyfikację. 17-calowy laptop bez problemu radzi sobie z grami, renderowaniem i wieloma innymi czynnościami. Szybkość transferu pamięci RAM odpowiada zwykłemu poziomowi wydajności pamięci DDR4-4800. System uzyskał również dobre wyniki w programie PCMark.

Laptop daje możliwości dalszego zwiększenia wydajności swojego systemu: na przykład zajęte są tylko dwa z czterech gniazd pamięci RAM.

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX (dGPU, Extreme Leistung)	8421 Points ∼100% +24%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8203 Points ∼97% +20%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	8186 Points ∼97% +20%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6812 - 8636, n=6)	7915 Points ∼94% +16%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	7884 Points ∼94% +16%
Average of class Gaming (3927 - 9331, n=190, last 2 years)	7159 Points ∼85% +5%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7139 Points ∼85% +5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6812 Points ∼81%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	11205 Points ∼100% +17%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX (dGPU, Extreme Leistung)	11192 Points ∼100% +17%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11093 Points ∼99% +16%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	11050 Points ∼99% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9598 - 11192, n=6)	10636 Points ∼95% +11%
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12639, n=189, last 2 years)	10365 Points ∼93% +8%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10254 Points ∼92% +7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9598 Points ∼86%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX (dGPU, Extreme Leistung)	10714 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9365 - 10932, n=6)	10276 Points ∼96% +10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10178 Points ∼95% +9%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	10144 Points ∼95% +8%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	9827 Points ∼92% +5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9365 Points ∼87%
Average of class Gaming (5997 - 11833, n=189, last 2 years)	9334 Points ∼87% 0%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9102 Points ∼85% -3%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX (dGPU, Extreme Leistung)	13515 Points ∼100% +42%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13270 Points ∼98% +39%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	13098 Points ∼97% +37%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9543 - 14291, n=6)	12358 Points ∼91% +29%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	12250 Points ∼91% +28%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10578 Points ∼78% +11%
Average of class Gaming (3613 - 16424, n=189, last 2 years)	10346 Points ∼77% +8%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9543 Points ∼71%

CrossMark / Overall
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2170 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (2108 - 2170, n=5)	2145 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2108 Points ∼97% -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1903 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2195, n=97, last 2 years)	1829 Points ∼84% -16%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1792 Points ∼83% -17%

CrossMark / Productivity
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2019 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1978 - 2047, n=5)	2015 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1978 Points ∼98% -2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1808 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2062, n=97, last 2 years)	1754 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1745 Points ∼86% -14%

CrossMark / Creativity
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2366 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (2288 - 2366, n=5)	2322 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2288 Points ∼97% -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	2095 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=97, last 2 years)	1964 Points ∼83% -17%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1893 Points ∼80% -20%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2081 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1991 - 2090, n=5)	2042 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1991 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2230, n=97, last 2 years)	1688 Points ∼81% -19%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1666 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1643 Points ∼79% -21%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4166 pkt.
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		6677 pkt.
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5165 pkt.
PCMark 10 Score		6812 pkt.
Pomoc

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (62852 - 70863, n=7)	65526 MB/s ∼100% +4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64030 MB/s ∼98% +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62961 MB/s ∼96%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60030 MB/s ∼92% -5%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	53861 MB/s ∼82% -14%
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 78835, n=202, last 2 years)	51110 MB/s ∼78% -19%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	46595 MB/s ∼71% -26%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (62140 - 72930, n=7)	67115 MB/s ∼100% +7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62759 MB/s ∼94%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62684 MB/s ∼93% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62140 MB/s ∼93% -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57237 MB/s ∼85% -9%
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 86294, n=202, last 2 years)	54837 MB/s ∼82% -13%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	46560 MB/s ∼69% -26%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (60001 - 68782, n=7)	62827 MB/s ∼100% +5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60093 MB/s ∼96%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60014 MB/s ∼96% 0%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	58004 MB/s ∼92% -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54443 MB/s ∼87% -9%
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 80441, n=202, last 2 years)	52040 MB/s ∼83% -13%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	47093 MB/s ∼75% -22%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98.4 ns * ∼100% -10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	89.8 ns * ∼91%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	88.8 ns * ∼90% +1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (83.9 - 93.4, n=7)	87.9 ns * ∼89% +2%
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 135.3, n=223, last 2 years)	69.8 ns * ∼71% +22%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	62.2 ns * ∼63% +31%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienie DPC

Nasz standardowy test monitorowania latencji (przeglądanie internetu, odtwarzanie wideo 4K, wysokie obciążenie Prime95) ujawnił pewne problemy z latencją DPC. System nie wydaje się być dobrze przystosowany do przetwarzania wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą poprawić lub nawet pogorszyć ten problem.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2203.2 μs * ∼100% -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	638.25 μs * ∼29% +71%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2189 μs * ∼99%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1101.9 μs * ∼50% +50%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	815 μs * ∼37% +63%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	388.5 μs * ∼18% +82%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Pamięć masowa

Titan może pomieścić do czterech dysków SSD M.2 2280 (3x PCIe 4, 1x PCIe 5). Dołączony do zestawu dysk SSD Samsunga o pojemności 2 TB (PCIe 4) jest w stanie zapewnić doskonałe prędkości transferu

WModelu "FHD, dysk SSD z systemem operacyjnym (również produkcji Samsunga) cierpi na spadki wydajności z powodu throttlingu termicznego. Być może trzy inne dyski SSD zainstalowane w laptopie uniemożliwiają optymalny przepływ powietrza. Dysk SSD w naszym aktualnym egzemplarzu testowym nie wykazuje spadków wydajności.

Do przechowywania systemu operacyjnego służy dysk SSD PCIe 4.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7057 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5153 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 975.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 767.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3963 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3930 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 90.14 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 274.2 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	84.3 pt ∼84%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	79.7 pt ∼80%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	78.8 pt ∼79%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	76 pt ∼76%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	75.5 pt ∼76%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	65.3 pt ∼65%
Average of class Gaming	59.6 pt ∼60%

DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4931 (4875.77^min - 4930.83^max) MB/s ∼100% +38%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4265 (4201.21^min - 4264.91^max) MB/s ∼86% +19%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2376 - 5676, n=23)	3954 MB/s ∼80% +11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3576 (3539.78^min - 3576.25^max) MB/s ∼73%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3561 (3468.06^min - 3560.96^max) MB/s ∼72% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3339 (3333.17^min - 3338.84^max) MB/s ∼68% -7%
Average of class Gaming (834 - 5676, n=188, last 2 years)	3099 MB/s ∼63% -13%
seq write
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4819 (4728.89^min - 4819.25^max) MB/s ∼100% +28%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2461 - 7628, n=23)	4290 MB/s ∼89% +14%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4173 (4063.65^min - 4172.96^max) MB/s ∼87% +11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3966 (3885.39^min - 3966.13^max) MB/s ∼82% +5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3763 (3603.04^min - 3762.92^max) MB/s ∼78%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3385 (3369.91^min - 3384.65^max) MB/s ∼70% -10%
Average of class Gaming (399 - 7889, n=187, last 2 years)	3291 MB/s ∼68% -13%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	13195 (9412.86^min - 13194.8^max) MB/s ∼100% +98%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3471 - 12556, n=23)	7186 MB/s ∼54% +8%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6722 (987.46^min - 6721.79^max) MB/s ∼51% +1%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6661 (6277.2^min - 6660.66^max) MB/s ∼50% 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6649 (6282.23^min - 6649.44^max) MB/s ∼50%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	6149 (5544.48^min - 6148.64^max) MB/s ∼47% -8%
Average of class Gaming (1620 - 13195, n=188, last 2 years)	5382 MB/s ∼41% -19%
seq q8 t1 write
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	8227 (8104.29^min - 8226.71^max) MB/s ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3537 - 10261, n=23)	5607 MB/s ∼68% +13%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5037 (5025^min - 5036.73^max) MB/s ∼61% +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4951 (4867.19^min - 4950.96^max) MB/s ∼60%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4939 (4932.28^min - 4939.42^max) MB/s ∼60% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4847 (4832.05^min - 4846.52^max) MB/s ∼59% -2%
Average of class Gaming (86.2 - 10261, n=188, last 2 years)	4033 MB/s ∼49% -19%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	83 (80.56^min - 82.99^max) MB/s ∼100% +3%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS 4k Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB