testy i recenzje laptopów - polska edycja - laptop > Laptopy > Recenzja Asus X57Vn

Test Asus X57Vn

Asus X57Vn to w istocie rzeczy pozbawiony niektórych bajerów Asus M50. Chodzi o odmianę tego szeroko znanego modelu z konfiguracją stworzoną na życzenie sklepu, partnera Asusa. X57Vn dysponuje wydajną kartą grafiki GeForce 9650M GT, która pozwala na zabawę z najnowszymi grami. Czyli jest zarazem trochę lepszy i gorszy od pierwowzoru. Czy w generalnym rozrachunku przeważają plusy czy cechy ujemne?

Obudowa

Asus X57Vn

Jak zaznaczono, Asus X57Vn to zubożona wersja M50. Wychwycić różnice nie jest trudno, ale laptopy są prawie identyczne. Ten niniejszym przedstawiany jest pozbawiony jest biżuterii, a więc chromowych obwódek głośników czy aluminiowego panelu, który w M50 otacza wyłącznik, przyciski szybkiego dostępu i kontrolki.

X57Vn jest więc prawie równie ładny jak notebook, na bazie którego powstał. Odjęcie części elementów wystroju nie zburzyło eleganckiego wizerunku, ale oczywiście ten skromniejszy model nie robi tak piorunującego wrażenia jak ten bardziej ozdobny.

Jakość wykonania jest jednak ta sama. Nie jest więc tak, że X57Vn powstaje na innej, stojącej na niższym poziomie linii montażowej. Wysoko można ocenić spasowanie, korpus jest solidny, tworzywo na tyle dobrej klasy, ze nie ma problemu z trzeszczeniem obudowy. Wieko jest trochę wrażliwe na naduszanie, ale to problem spotykany w większości laptopów. Zawiasy działają bardzo dobrze.

przód: port podczerwieni, wyłącznik WiFi
przód: port podczerwieni, wyłącznik WiFi
lewy bok: VGA, wylot wentylatora, USB, FireWire, eSATA, ExpressCard, HDMI, czytnik kart
lewy bok: VGA, wylot wentylatora, USB, FireWire, eSATA, ExpressCard, HDMI, czytnik kart
prawy bok: gniazda audio, 2x USB, napęd optyczny, USB
prawy bok: gniazda audio, 2x USB, napęd optyczny, USB
tył: blokada Kensingtona, akumulator, modem, LAN, gniazdo zasilania
tył: blokada Kensingtona, akumulator, modem, LAN, gniazdo zasilania

Osprzęt

Klawiatura jest identyczna jak ta z M50 i faktycznie odnaleźliśmy w niej te same cechy co we wcześniej testowanym modelu. Jest ona typowa dla Asusa, a więc wyraźnie plastikowa (klawiatury niektórych innych marek są subtelniejsze i nie dają tak jednoznacznie poznać tego po sobie). Nie pisze się na niej tak dobrze, jak na zaliczanych do najlepszych klawiaturach biznesowych HP, Delli czy ThinkPadów.

Z drugiej strony klawiatura nie posiada takich wad, które pogrążałyby ją z kretesem. Pewnym mankamentem jest lekkie uginanie się instrumentu, ale to raczej tylko defekt estetyczny, bez znaczenia praktycznego.

Choć klawiatura jest wzbogacona o odrębny blok numeryczny, rozmiary klawiszy z zasadniczego bloku nie ucierpiały (co jest sukcesem w laptopie z ekranem 15,4”).

Gładzik jest podobny jak w M50, aczkolwiek nieco inny. I w tym wypadku jest on dwufunkcyjny, z tym że w X57Vn implementowano inne funkcje (stąd inny rysunek na tabliczce). Podstawowym plusem z naszego punktu widzenia jest to, że rzadziej aktywuje się przypadkowo tryb alternatywny, blokujący wskaźnik.

Przyciski towarzyszące są dość twarde, mają krótki skok, ale korzysta się z nich bez trudu.

Asus X57Vn
klawiatura
Asus X57Vn
touchpad

Obraz

Asus X57Vn
diagram barw

Przyglądając się Asusowi X57Vn, można sobie pomyśleć, że to jakaś podrzędna wersja M50. Tymczasem przechodząc do inspekcji matrycy, mamy niespodziankę. Niby w specyfikacji widnieją identyczne dane jak w M50Vm (15,4” WXGA+ 1440x900), ale X57Vn otrzymał inny, lepszy wyświetlacz, którego producentem AU Optronics (w testowanym wcześniej modelu mieliśmy matrycę firmy Chunghwa).

Wyświetlacz AUO dawał obraz sporo jaśniejszy i bardziej kontrastowy. Średnia wartość luminancji wyniosła 180 cd/m², czyli aż 20 cd/m² więcej niż w matrycy CPT z M50Vm. Kontrast wyraża się proporcją 301:1, czyli jest całkiem w porządku.

         
 178,2
cd/m²		192,6
cd/m²		159,6
cd/m²
 190,7
cd/m²		210,8
cd/m²		182,9
cd/m²
 189,3
cd/m²		179,6
cd/m²		185,1
cd/m²
         
Parametry
maksimum: 210,8 cd/m²
średnia: 184.9 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 76 %
czerń: 0.7 cd/m²
kontrast: 300:1
podświetlenie ekranu

Czerń wdawała się nam dość ładna, za to gorzej wyglądały odcienie szarości. Biel w porównaniu ze wzorcem była nieco zaniebieszczona, co świadczy o tym, że w obrazie przeważają barwy chłodne.

Naszym zdaniem kąty widzenia tej matrycy są bez rewelacji, choć istnieją oczywiście wyświetlacze o słabszych. Mieliśmy jednak porównanie z matrycą WSXGA+ z MSI GX620, no i w tej ostatniej kąty w pionie okazały się wyraźnie szersze.

  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn

Osiągi

Testowaliśmy Asusa X57Vn z procesorem Core 2 Duo P8400 (2,26 GHz), a więc tym samym, z którym mieliśmy do czynienia w przypadku modelu M50Vm. Może w laptopie, który ma się cechować wysokimi osiągami, chciałoby się widzieć szybszy procesor (przynajmniej P8600), ale P8400 nie jest w końcu taki zły i trudno wybrzydzać. Szczególnie że mocniejsze jednostki są droższe, przy czym różnica w cenie nie jest zwykle proporcjonalna do przyrostu wydajności.

Asus X57Vn tym się zasadniczo różni od M50Vm, że zastosowano w nim inny układ graficzny – nie GeForce 9600M GS a 9650M GT (nie mylić z 9650M GS, która to karta to właściwie przemianowany GF 8700M GT). Sporo się nagromadziło wątpliwości względem tego modelu, więc przy okazji recenzji trzeba wyjaśnić sprawę. Wydajność wariantu tej karty (GF 9650M GT) z 1024 MB własnej pamięci DDR2 plasuje ją pomiędzy GF 9600M GT z DDR2 i GDDR3. Po raz kolejny więc wychodzi na jaw, jak zasadniczą rolę gra typ zastosowanych pamięci (ich taktowanie ma kolosalny wpływ na przepustowość magistrali pamięci, a więc szybkość, z jaka mogą być przesyłane dane z i do pamięci karty graficznej).

3D Mark
3DMark 2001SE22898 pkt.
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(4)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(2)(0)(0)(0)(2)(2)(1)(4)(1)(2)(2)(5)(5)(2)(1)(6)(2)(0)(5)(1)(3)(2)(1)(2)(4)(3)(4)(1)(6)(1)(4)(3)(2)(1)(4)(4)(1)(3)(4)(8)(8)(5)(4)(5)(5)(3)(4)(3)(3)(1)(3)(5)(1)(1)(4)(3)(7)(3)(1)(4)(7)(3)(0)(1)(3)(1)(0)(3)(1)(2)(1)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(1)(2)(1)(3)(2)(0)(2)(1)(0)(2)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)
3DMark 0312967 pkt.
(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(3)(0)(2)(2)(2)(0)(2)(5)(5)(1)(2)(7)(5)(0)(3)(3)(5)(1)(2)(4)(6)(1)(7)(4)(1)(2)(7)(3)(3)(3)(7)(14)(3)(4)(4)(4)(2)(6)(3)(1)(4)(2)(4)(6)(0)(0)(1)(1)(2)(2)(1)(2)(5)(2)(4)(1)(3)(5)(3)(3)(4)(3)(2)(3)(9)(3)(5)(9)(13)(4)(5)(3)(6)(2)(4)(5)(13)(1)(4)(2)(2)(4)(3)(1)(2)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(1)(3)(2)(0)(1)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(2)(0)(0)(1)
3DMark 058350 pkt.
(0)(0)(0)(2)(1)(0)(1)(1)(0)(1)(1)(2)(0)(3)(2)(0)(0)(5)(0)(0)(2)(1)(2)(7)(7)(10)(2)(5)(2)(3)(4)(3)(5)(3)(2)(0)(2)(2)(0)(4)(4)(1)(5)(6)(5)(2)(6)(4)(5)(2)(4)(3)(8)(1)(5)(6)(6)(2)(3)(5)(4)(4)(2)(5)(7)(3)(2)(0)(1)(2)(0)(1)(1)(1)(3)(2)(4)(1)(3)(2)(2)(2)(3)(3)(2)(2)(6)(2)(4)(8)(0)(4)(0)(2)(4)(8)(2)(2)(0)(5)(4)(6)(13)(17)(1)(3)(2)(2)(3)(5)(3)(4)(1)(1)(2)(2)(3)(1)(0)(3)(4)(8)(2)(0)(2)(0)(1)(0)(3)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(1)(2)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(3)(1)(0)(1)(1)(0)(2)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)
3DMark 06
 1280x768		4826 pkt.
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(1)(0)(1)(1)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(1)(0)(1)(2)(0)(2)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(1)(1)(0)(1)(1)(1)(0)(1)(0)(2)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(1)(2)(1)(3)(0)(0)(1)(1)(1)(0)(3)(2)(1)(2)(2)(2)(0)(1)(0)(3)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(1)(2)(0)(3)(3)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)
Pomoc
3DMark 06 porównanie
Dell Vostro V130 PL (min)
 470UM, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
1145
   ...
Dell Vostro V130 PL
 470UM, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
1145
Lenovo B560 (59-057197)
 P6100, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
1446
   ...
Acer Aspire TimelineX 4830TG (LX.RGL02.045) (max)
 2410M, GeForce GT 540M
8829
PC Mark
PCMark 054803 pkt.
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(2)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(3)(2)(2)(2)(1)(4)(0)(2)(7)(5)(1)(1)(4)(4)(3)(6)(4)(8)(7)(4)(6)(2)(3)(3)(5)(4)(2)(7)(4)(5)(3)(3)(3)(7)(2)(1)(4)(4)(1)(2)(2)(4)(1)(4)(3)(3)(3)(0)(4)(0)(2)(1)(0)(2)(0)(3)(2)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)
Pomoc
PCMark 05 porównanie
HP ProBook 6460b LG645EA (min)
 2520M, HD Graphics 3000
7514
   ...
HP ProBook 6460b LG645EA
 2520M, HD Graphics 3000
7514
HP ProBook 6560b-LG658EA
 2520M, Radeon HD 6470M
8593
   ...
Fujitsu Celsius H710 WXP11DE (max)
 2820QM, Quadro 1000M
13842
Cinebench R10
 UstawieniaWynik
 Shading 32Bit3632 Points
 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit4694 Points
 Rendering Single 32Bit2510 Points
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo
 RozdzielczośćUstawieniaWynik
 1024x768highest, 0xAA, 0xAF464.3 fps
F.E.A.R.
 RozdzielczośćUstawieniaWynik
 1024x768GPU: max, CPU: max, 0xAA, 0xAF27 fps
 800x600GPU medium, CPU medium, 0xAA, 0xAF27 fps
 640x480GPU min, CPU min, 0xAA, 0xAF226 fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark
 RozdzielczośćUstawieniaWynik
 1440x900High, 0AA, 0AF7.98 fps
 1440x900Medium, 0xAA, 0xAF13.85 fps
 1440x900Low, 0xAA, 0xAF24.85 fps
 1024x768High, 0xAA, 0xAF11.19 fps
 1024x768Medium, 0xAA, 0xAF18.63 fps
 1024x768Low, 0xAA, 0xAF33.21 fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark
 RozdzielczośćUstawieniaWynik
 1440x900High, 0AA, 0AF8.41 fps
 1440x900Medium, 0xAA, 0xAF14.22 fps
 1440x900Low, 0xAA, 0xAF25.01 fps
 1024x768High12.09 fps
 1024x768Medium, 0xAA, 0xAF19.64 fps
 1024x768Low, 0xAA, 0xAF33.14 fps
hddimg
320 GB - 5400 rpm
przesył danych (minimum): 29 MB/s
(37)(38)(36)(24)(22)(29)(35)(54)(64)(59)(52)(76)(92)(88)(97)(91)(80)(68)(55)(30)(43)(26)(6)(7)(5)(7)(4)(4)(5)(3)(1)(1)(1)(2)(0)(0)(2)(1)(1)(1)(0)(0)(1)(2)(4)(0)(0)(3)(1)(2)(0)(2)(1)(0)(2)(2)(5)(2)(0)(1)(1)(3)(1)(1)(0)(0)(2)(3)(0)(1)(4)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(2)(1)(1)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)
przesył danych (maksimum): 63.7 MB/s
(0)(2)(0)(0)(0)(6)(7)(14)(30)(57)(54)(50)(15)(32)(63)(87)(74)(51)(90)(133)(98)(96)(51)(40)(32)(66)(43)(20)(12)(8)(2)(3)(0)(0)(2)(3)(4)(6)(5)(7)(6)(0)(4)(1)(4)(1)(3)(2)(2)(1)(2)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(2)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(3)(2)(0)(2)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)
przesył danych (średnio): 48.9 MB/s
(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(7)(5)(21)(62)(64)(45)(23)(32)(75)(83)(80)(74)(108)(152)(90)(61)(57)(47)(60)(39)(16)(17)(6)(1)(2)(1)(1)(4)(2)(2)(1)(0)(2)(1)(3)(4)(2)(4)(4)(4)(4)(1)(4)(2)(2)(3)(4)(1)(2)(1)(1)(0)(1)(0)(2)(1)(2)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)
czas dostępu: 18.3 ms
(89)(8)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(2)(7)(16)(27)(22)(48)(30)(69)(153)(117)(119)(147)(124)(92)(54)(44)(25)(30)(24)(12)(5)(6)(7)(9)(3)(2)(2)(1)(0)(1)(2)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(2)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)
szybkość interfejsu: 88.7 MB/s
(2)(6)(25)(73)(232)(327)(310)(127)(93)(44)(28)(18)(0)(2)(1)(2)(0)(0)(2)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(2)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(3)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)
obciążenie procesora: 2.4 %
(35)(0)(377)(36)(90)(57)(68)(59)(60)(35)(36)(21)(29)(18)(25)(16)(15)(6)(5)(7)(10)(5)(7)(4)(5)(5)(1)(5)(7)(0)(5)(3)(2)(1)(2)(2)(3)(2)(3)(5)(1)(3)(2)(0)(2)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(1)(2)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(2)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(2)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)

Sprawność w grach (Fraps 60 s):

Call of Duty 4
rozdzielczość 1280x720, detale na "normal/medium"
min. 16, śr. 25,13, maks. 32 kl/s

Gothic 3
rozdzielczość 1024x768, detale na "high"
min. 10, śr. 28,88, maks. 43 kl/s

Medal of Honor Airborne
rozdzielczość 1280x720, wszystko na "medium"
min. 33, śr. 37,82, maks. 45 kl/s

Supreme Commander
rozdzielczość 1024x768, detale na "high", AA wyłączony
min. 16, śr. 18,88, maks. 23 kl/s

Wiedźmin
rozdzielczość 1280x720, detale na "medium", AA wyłączony
min. 24, śr. 44,57, maks. 66 kl/s

Wpływ na otoczenie

Hałas

X57Vn jest głośniejszy od dysponującego słabszą kartą grafiki M50Vm. Różnica to objawia się jednak tylko w warunkach poważnego obciążenia (sprawdzian symulujący modelowanie 3D). Wtedy właśnie emisja hałasu skoczyła powyżej 40 dB. Poza tym laptop ten zachowywał się identycznie jak M50Vm, czyli był bardzo cichy.

Hałas

luz 32,8 / 32,8 / 32,8 dB
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(0)(1)(10)(0)(1)(43)(0)(3)(35)(49)(0)(0)(109)(0)(7)(72)(0)(3)(4)(35)(2)(0)(23)(0)(5)(10)(1)(2)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(2)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(5)(0)(0)(0)(15)(0)(1)(5)(46)(0)(3)(88)(0)(0)(99)(0)(0)(0)(51)(1)(14)(16)(2)(0)(23)(0)(0)(9)(1)(0)(0)(12)(0)(2)(5)(1)(0)(9)(0)(0)(3)(11)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)
(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(0)(0)(0)(7)(0)(1)(23)(8)(0)(0)(61)(0)(0)(78)(0)(9)(13)(51)(0)(0)(42)(0)(0)(44)(2)(13)(12)(0)(0)(2)(12)(1)(1)(9)(1)(1)(5)(0)(0)(1)(17)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)
HDD 33,8 dB
(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(2)(17)(0)(3)(0)(57)(3)(10)(73)(1)(1)(93)(0)(0)(3)(55)(3)(1)(20)(0)(3)(13)(0)(0)(9)(7)(10)(1)(1)(0)(0)(2)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)
DVD 34,1 / 42,6 dB
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(3)(0)(11)(1)(0)(9)(1)(38)(0)(9)(54)(5)(0)(80)(0)(16)(9)(34)(0)(11)(35)(1)(5)(27)(0)(2)(4)(14)(0)(2)(5)(1)(0)(5)(0)(0)(4)(0)(0)(2)(5)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(0)(0)(1)(2)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(3)(0)(6)(0)(0)(1)(8)(0)(0)(9)(0)(0)(4)(3)(0)(0)(4)(4)(0)(7)(0)(0)(5)(6)(0)(0)(0)(11)(0)(3)(6)(0)(11)(0)(0)(0)(0)(11)(0)(13)(4)(0)(2)(9)(1)(5)(0)(0)(0)(5)
obciążenie 33,8 / 40,2 dB
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(6)(18)(0)(1)(6)(14)(0)(3)(32)(0)(8)(38)(0)(0)(10)(39)(0)(9)(20)(1)(1)(31)(1)(2)(20)(4)(0)(4)(23)(0)(0)(18)(1)(2)(14)(4)(1)(7)(12)(0)(1)(9)(0)(0)(5)(0)(0)(1)(7)(3)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(1)
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(2)(1)(0)(3)(0)(0)(0)(5)(3)(4)(2)(4)(1)(0)(9)(8)(0)(0)(22)(2)(7)(27)(1)(0)(22)(24)(0)(1)(49)(0)(0)(41)(0)(0)(13)(25)(0)(0)(42)(0)(1)(23)(0)(1)(1)(18)(0)(0)(20)(1)(4)(15)(0)(0)(0)(4)(0)(0)
 
    30 dB
cichy		 40 dB
słyszalny		 50 dB
irytujący		  
min: , med: , max:     (odległość 15 cm)

Ciepło

Obudowa Asusa X57Vn nagrzewa się w podobnym stopniu co rekordowo chłodnego M50Vm – różnice wzięły się przede wszystkim z nieco wyższej temperatury otoczenia, w której przeprowadzany był test tego pierwszego. I w przypadku tego modelu możemy zatem mówić o bardzo dobrej kulturze pracy.

Również temperatury podzespołów są znikome – maksimum dla karty graficznej wynosiło sześćdziesiąt kilka stopni Celsjusza. 

z obciążeniem
         
 31,1 °C31,3 °C27,1 °C
 31,9 °C31 °C27,4 °C
 30,7 °C31,6 °C28,5 °C
         
 
         
 25,1 °C28 °C32,4 °C
 28,2 °C27,8 °C35,3 °C
 30,2 °C29,7 °C27,2 °C
         
maks. w ogóle: 31,9 °C
średnia: 29.7 °C		 maks. w ogóle: 35,3 °C
średnia: 29 °C
temperatura otoczenia 21,5 °C

Głośniki

X57Vn otrzymał te same głośniki Altec Lansing, z którymi mieliśmy styczność w M50Vm. Odtwarzany dźwięk ma dobrą jakość, ale brakuje w nim tonów niskich. Przy maksymalnej sile głosu wkradają się doń jedynie śladowe nieczystości.

Wydajność akumulatora

Choć X57Vn jest obdarzony tym samym akumulatorem o pojemności 4800 mAh (53 Wh) co M50Vm, a także posiada matrycę dającą trochę jaśniejszy obraz, uzyskaliśmy w jego teście nieco dłuższe czasy pracy.

Jak na multimedialny notebook Asusa przebiegi na baterii nie są zresztą złe. Dwie i pół godziny korzystania z sieci przez WiFi to już chwalebny wynik.

Wydajność akumulatora

luz4h 07min
(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(2)(2)(5)(12)(15)(21)(40)(25)(37)(29)(33)(25)(21)(20)(18)(12)(12)(8)(6)(12)(8)(10)(4)(9)(8)(5)(2)(2)(3)(3)(6)(1)(1)(3)(0)(2)(1)(1)(4)(1)(1)(3)(2)(1)(1)(1)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)
sieć przez WLAN2h 27min 
(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(4)(20)(35)(48)(32)(41)(34)(19)(21)(25)(12)(11)(15)(7)(9)(8)(1)(3)(2)(7)(3)(2)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(0)(2)(2)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)
DVD1h 36min 
(0)(0)(0)(3)(11)(40)(56)(51)(59)(34)(34)(31)(20)(11)(15)(8)(6)(5)(5)(3)(5)(4)(4)(1)(2)(2)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)
obciążenie1h 21min 
(0)(0)(8)(88)(147)(90)(59)(24)(13)(7)(5)(2)(1)(1)(2)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)

Zużycie prądu

luz 18.5 / 26 / 28,1 W
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(2)(11)(10)(5)(16)(29)(7)(12)(38)(25)(36)(2)(23)(18)(16)(18)(4)(12)(9)(16)(14)(9)(1)(7)(7)(12)(2)(7)(9)(5)(6)(0)(2)(0)(5)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(3)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(4)(6)(7)(6)(14)(12)(18)(0)(26)(20)(22)(27)(11)(17)(17)(15)(15)(3)(27)(0)(15)(15)(8)(9)(7)(10)(6)(1)(6)(7)(7)(5)(1)(9)(2)(6)(5)(1)(1)(0)(1)(7)(0)(2)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(5)(0)(5)(7)(10)(2)(11)(9)(19)(24)(8)(10)(26)(18)(12)(8)(7)(12)(17)(16)(8)(6)(12)(10)(11)(8)(5)(7)(12)(6)(7)(0)(11)(8)(7)(3)(5)(4)(7)(10)(4)(1)(1)(3)(1)(1)(0)(2)(6)(1)(0)(1)(0)(2)(1)(2)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(1)(2)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)
obciążenie 53 / 66 W
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(1)(3)(0)(0)(4)(2)(1)(3)(5)(6)(1)(6)(6)(8)(6)(2)(7)(9)(10)(11)(10)(0)(8)(12)(13)(8)(11)(6)(9)(10)(0)(13)(14)(7)(14)(1)(23)(1)(12)(6)(0)(12)(0)(6)(10)(5)(7)(1)(4)(4)(7)(7)(1)(1)(8)(0)(9)(2)(3)(4)(3)(2)(4)(7)(3)(1)(2)(3)(0)(0)(2)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(4)(1)(0)(3)(4)(1)(0)(3)(3)(4)(1)(4)(0)(5)(7)(2)(4)(8)(10)(8)(0)(5)(10)(6)(9)(9)(2)(5)(11)(12)(8)(7)(7)(3)(6)(10)(2)(13)(7)(15)(6)(3)(5)(5)(11)(3)(8)(0)(7)(5)(4)(4)(2)(8)(13)(3)(3)(5)(5)(6)(5)(1)(3)(2)(1)(1)(1)
 
Legenda: min: , med: , max:         

Podsumowanie

Przy zakupie laptopa dobrze kierować się rachunkiem ekonomicznym. Wybierając pomiędzy Asusami X57Vn i M50Vm mamy w podobnej cenie laptop z nieco wydajniejszą kartą grafiki i lepsza matrycą (chyba że do obu trafiają różne wyświetlacze, czego nie można wykluczyć) lub trochę gorszy od strony technicznej, ale bardziej efektowny i nieco cichszy.

X57Vn jest bowiem zubożonym od strony wystroju wariantem M50, dysponującym kartą grafiki o lepszych osiągach (GeForce 9650M GT z DDR2) oraz matrycą dającą jaśniejszy i bardziej kontrastowy obraz.

Tym samym to właśnie X57Vn wydaje się lepiej predysponowanym do nawiązania rywalizacji z cieszącymi się ostatnio dużym zainteresowaniem laptopami kategorii 15,4”, które można wykorzystywać do gier, a więc przede wszystkim Acerem 5930G, MSI GX620 i Samsungiem R560. Ta trójka dysponuje jednak sporo wydajniejszą kartą graficzną GF 9600M GT z pamięcią GDDR3. Nad dwoma z nich Asus góruje matrycą  wyższej rozdzielczości, natomiast od MSI jest lepszy w dziedzinie długości pracy na akumulatorze.

Asus X57Vn
Asus X57Vn

 

Dziękujemy za wypożyczenie egzemplarza do testu firmie X-KOM. Zakupu tego sprzętu można dokonać w jej sklepie internetowym.

Zachęcamy do dyskusji nt. powyższego testu i testowanego urządzenia na naszym forum. -> Forum

Asus X57Vn
z bliska: Asus X57Vn

Specyfikacja techniczna

Asus X57Vn

:: Procesor
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26 GHz
:: Chipset
Intel PM45
:: Pamięć
3072 MB, DDR2-800, 2 GB + 1 GB
:: Karta grafiki
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT - 1024 MB, rdzeń: 550 MHz, pamięć: 400 MHz, ForceWare 176.05
:: Matryca
15,4 cali 16:10, 1440x900 pikseli, AU Optronics B154PW02 V2 / AUO2277, refleksująca: tak
:: Dysk twardy
320 GB - 5400 rpm, 320GB 5400obr/min Hitachi HTS543232L9A300
:: Karta dźwiękowa
Realtek ALC663
:: Złącza
1 ExpressCard/54, 4 USB 2.0, 1 FireWire, 1 VGA/D-Sub, 1 HDMI, 56 kb/s modem, 1 blokada Kensingtona, 1 eSATA, gniazda audio: wejście mikrofonowe, wyjście słuchawkowe, czytnik kart: 8 w 1 (SD/MMC/MS/MS Pro),
:: Łączność
Realtek RTL8168C/8111C Family PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless WiFi Link 5100 (abgn), jest Bluetooth
:: Napęd optyczny
TSSTcorp CDDVDW TS-L633A
:: Gabaryty
wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 44 x 375 x 269
:: Waga
2.982 kg zasilacz: 0.475 kg
:: Akumulator
53 Wh litowo-jonowy, 6-komorowa, 4800 mAh
:: Cena
3799 PLN
:: System operacyjny
Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium 32 Bit
:: Inne
kamerka 1,3 megapiksela

Sprzęt dostarczył

sklep komputerowy X-Kom
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn
  • Asus X57Vn

Podobne laptopy

Notebooki z tym samym GPU

» Recenzja Asus L50Vn
Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.4", 3.285 kg

Laptopy z tą samą przekątną ekranu i/lub wagą

» Recenzja Samsung R560
GeForce GT 130M, Core 2 Duo P8600
» Recenzja Dell Precision M4400
Quadro FX 1700M, Core 2 Duo T9400
» Recenzja Toshiba Satellite Pro S300
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD, Core 2 Duo P8600
» Recenzja HP Compaq 6735b
Radeon HD 3200, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
» Recenzja Asus X56Ta
Mobility Radeon HD 3650, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
» Recenzja Mitac 9008D
Mobility Radeon HD 3470, Core 2 Duo P8600
» Recenzja HP Compaq 6730b
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD, Core 2 Duo P8600

Za

+korzystny wygląd (mimo braku części upiększeń)
+solidne wykonanie
+bardzo dobra kultura pracy, objawiająca się szczególnie niskimi temperaturami
+wydajniejsza niż w M50Vm karta graficzna
+matryca nieco lepsza niż M50Vm
+bogate wyposażenie w złącza
+dobre głośniczki
 

Przeciw

-stosunkowo ciężki
-nie tak elegancki jak M50Vm

 

> testy i recenzje laptopów - polska edycja - laptopy, notebooki, opinie, porady, porównania, baza testów, nowinki > Laptopy > Recenzja Asus X57Vn
2. styczeń 2012